Category Archives: Warrant requirement

D.Kan.: Failure to sign affidavit for SW after being sworn not a Fourth Amendment violation

The failure of the officer to sign the affidavit after he was sworn did not void the warrant. It actually was issued on “oath or affirmation.” United States v. Williamson, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77703 (D. Kan. March 18, 2014), … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Failure to sign affidavit for SW after being sworn not a Fourth Amendment violation

CA7: “[T]the Fourth Amendment is not a bulwark against typos.”

DNA warrant for defendant that transposed month and day (11-01 v. 01-11) using military and international convention was still for him. “[T]the Fourth Amendment is not a bulwark against typos.” United States v. Clark, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 10613 (7th … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA7: “[T]the Fourth Amendment is not a bulwark against typos.”

WSJ: Sealed Court Files Obscure Rise in Electronic Surveillance

WSJ: Sealed Court Files Obscure Rise in Electronic Surveillance by Jennifer Valentino-DeVries: Data obtained by The Wall Street Journal from the Justice Department and various federal district courts suggest that electronic-surveillance orders have increased over the past decade and that … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on WSJ: Sealed Court Files Obscure Rise in Electronic Surveillance

CO finds McNeely violation in blood draw from unconscious defendant; Roberts’s proposal rejected

Defendant was unconscious in a hospital after a car wreck that injured others. An officer at the hospital directed a nurse to draw blood for criminal purposes, but didn’t even think about getting a warrant. The blood draw violated the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CO finds McNeely violation in blood draw from unconscious defendant; Roberts’s proposal rejected

WaPo: E-mail privacy hasn’t been updated in 28 years. This could be the bill to do it.

WaPo: E-mail privacy hasn’t been updated in 28 years. This could be the bill to do it. by Brian Fung: Thanks to a law that was written before “Robocop,” law enforcement agencies are allowed to poke around inside your e-mail … Continue reading

Posted in Informational privacy, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on WaPo: E-mail privacy hasn’t been updated in 28 years. This could be the bill to do it.

CA9: Applying a functional reasonableness analysis, the 21 day delay in getting a SW after computer seizure was reasonable

In a child pornography case, defendant’s computer was held for 21 days before a search warrant was obtained, and he moved to suppress. On the totality, the court finds the delay reasonable and did not substantially interfere with defendant’s possessory … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Reasonableness, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA9: Applying a functional reasonableness analysis, the 21 day delay in getting a SW after computer seizure was reasonable

WI: Consent to a BAC test overcomes McNeeley

Consent to a BAC test overcomes McNeeley. State v. Padley, 2014 Wisc. App. LEXIS 414 (May 22, 2014). Defendant’s not dimming his lights for a parked patrol vehicle was not a traffic offense, so his stop was invalid. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on WI: Consent to a BAC test overcomes McNeeley

Cincinnati.com: Pants full of candy erupts into legal battle; SW for PD’s office

Cincinnati.com: Pants full of candy erupts into legal battle by Kimball Perry: A Hamilton County theft case involving a man who stuffed $200 worth of candy in his pants erupted into a heated legal battle that has left defense attorneys … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on Cincinnati.com: Pants full of candy erupts into legal battle; SW for PD’s office

TX4 follows TX7 and TX13 and holds warrantless blood draw violates McNeely

TX4 follows TX7 and TX13 and holds warrantless blood draw violates McNeely. Weems v. State, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 5109 (Tex. App.–San Antonio May 14, 2014): We agree with both the Amarillo [Sutherland v. State, No. 07-12-00289-CR, 2014 Tex. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TX4 follows TX7 and TX13 and holds warrantless blood draw violates McNeely

W.D.Tex.: Failure to show SW is not a Fourth Amendment violation

2255 petitioner did not show that he was prejudiced by officers showing up at 5:30 am rather than 6 for execution of a search warrant, if that in fact happened. Rule 41 violations are ministerial, it doesn’t per se violate … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Failure to show SW is not a Fourth Amendment violation

N.D.Ga.: The reality of Gates-Leon: Showing no PC is an uphill battle

Recognizing the reality of Gates-Leon: “the Defendant challenges whether the Magistrate Judge should have issued the warrant at all based on the information presented in the agent’s affidavit. This argument faces difficult legal standards, which the Defendant cannot meet. His … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: The reality of Gates-Leon: Showing no PC is an uphill battle

M.D.Ala.: Scrivener’s error in time of issuance of SW is corrected

The time of the warrant of 10:31 pm was clearly a scrivener’s error because it was issued at 9:31 pm. Therefore, the search warrant did not issue after the search began, and the motion to suppress is denied. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Uncategorized, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Scrivener’s error in time of issuance of SW is corrected

N.D.Idaho: SW application is for evidence to be found, not to implicate a target

In a business records search, the question is probable cause to believe evidence will be found, and it isn’t necessary for the search warrant affidavit to implicate a possible target of the search to be valid. United States v. Suarez, … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Scope of search, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on N.D.Idaho: SW application is for evidence to be found, not to implicate a target

KLAS TV: I-Team: Do police seek search warrant friendly judges?

KLAS TV: I-Team: Do police seek search warrant friendly judges? by Glen Meek: LAS VEGAS — Could police be playing favorites when it comes to getting search warrants signed by local magistrates? An I-Team investigation shows one judge has signed … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on KLAS TV: I-Team: Do police seek search warrant friendly judges?

OR: Search of home requires more than just PC; there must be a warrant or warrant exception

Defendant argued the search of her bedroom was without consent, therefore invalid. The trial court found probable cause and sustained the search. Reversed: Without an exception to the warrant requirement, the search was invalid, and the state argues none. State … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on OR: Search of home requires more than just PC; there must be a warrant or warrant exception

WaPo: Apple, Facebook, others defy authorities, notify users of secret data demands

WaPo: Apple, Facebook, others defy authorities, notify users of secret data demands by Craig Timberg: Major U.S. technology companies have largely ended the practice of quietly complying with investigators’ demands for e-mail records and other online data, saying that users … Continue reading

Posted in Informational privacy, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on WaPo: Apple, Facebook, others defy authorities, notify users of secret data demands

TX6: DUI blood draw without warrant here violated 4A

The taking of defendant’s blood without a warrant violated McNeely. “In light of the United States Supreme Court’s remand of Aviles and in light of the reasoning in Villarreal and Sutherland, we conclude that, in the absence of a warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TX6: DUI blood draw without warrant here violated 4A

M.D.Pa.: Officers reasonably believed person named in warrant resided with defendant, so entry valid

The DUSM here credibly testified that the target of his arrest warrant actually resided at the place searched, notwithstanding that the testimony proved incorrect. The belief was reasonable, so defendant’s rights were not violated. United States v. Vasquez-Algarin, 2014 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Border search, Consent, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Officers reasonably believed person named in warrant resided with defendant, so entry valid

Blacklisted.com: Police Mag: Fourth Amendment Is a “Hassle”

Blacklisted.com: Police Mag: Fourth Amendment Is a “Hassle” You have to reign in your natural hunter’s instinct and take the time to get a search warrant. There’s the affidavit of probable cause to compose, the warrant form to fill out, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on Blacklisted.com: Police Mag: Fourth Amendment Is a “Hassle”

WaPo: Low-level federal judges balking at law enforcement requests for electronic evidence

WaPo: Low-level federal judges balking at law enforcement requests for electronic evidence by Ann E. Marimow and Craig Timberg: Judges at the lowest levels of the federal judiciary are balking at sweeping requests by law enforcement officials for cellphone and … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, E-mail, ECPA, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on WaPo: Low-level federal judges balking at law enforcement requests for electronic evidence