OR: Search of home requires more than just PC; there must be a warrant or warrant exception

Defendant argued the search of her bedroom was without consent, therefore invalid. The trial court found probable cause and sustained the search. Reversed: Without an exception to the warrant requirement, the search was invalid, and the state argues none. State v. Groling, 262 Or. App. __, 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 614 (April 30, 2014).

Officers had probable cause to stop and search defendant’s car, including a brown pouch found inside. They had information about the pouch already, but they didn’t expect to find it in the car when it was stopped. But they did, and that’s good enough for the automobile exception. United States v. Mapuatuli, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61299 (D. Haw. May 2, 2014).*

Fleeing a traffic stop at high speeds and finally bailing out of the car and running away carrying a bag is reasonable suspicion. United States v. Williams, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61358 (M.D. Fla. April 3, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk, Warrant requirement. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.