Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

OR: Smell of MJ around three men was RS as to all

Smell of marijuana around three men was reasonable suspicion as to all. “Defendant argues that, because Ploghoft only detected the odor of marijuana in the vicinity of the men, and could not trace it to defendant in particular, that was … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: Smell of MJ around three men was RS as to all

FL: Color discrepancy in DMV record not enough for a stop

A color discrepancy from DMV on a vehicle alone is not a basis for a stop. Here, the car was bright green and DMV showed it to be blue. That’s not enough. State v. Van Teamer, 151 So. 3d 421 … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL: Color discrepancy in DMV record not enough for a stop

N.D.Ga.: Whatever time is “reasonable” for a stop, the clock restarts when consent is granted

The stop was of reasonable duration before consent was sought. “Once Jaramillo consented to the search of the Tahoe, ‘the clock re-started for purposes of evaluating the reasonableness of the duration of the intrusion.’ Hernandez, 418 F.3d at 1210 (citation … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Whatever time is “reasonable” for a stop, the clock restarts when consent is granted

E.D.Ky.: Question is PC for a stop, not whether the defendant actually violated the law

The stop was valid. “Whether Flores actually violated the law is immaterial. The question is only whether Deputy Broce had probable cause to suspect that Flores was committing a traffic violation.” The officer could ask defendant to produce what created … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Question is PC for a stop, not whether the defendant actually violated the law

NC: De minimus rule for traffic stops doesn’t apply when they have to wait for the drug dog

Once the basis for the traffic stop was completed, the stop had to end. Defendant was asked for consent and refused, and the officer told him he was staying for a drug dog to arrive. The state argued for the … Continue reading

Posted in Informational privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on NC: De minimus rule for traffic stops doesn’t apply when they have to wait for the drug dog

E.D.Tenn.: No standing to contest seizure of guns left at a pawn shop

Defendant had no standing to contest law enforcement’s seizure of guns he pawned at a pawn shop. United States v. Sanders, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88788 (E.D. Tenn. May 19, 2014).* The officer had reasonable suspicion defendant was driving under … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: No standing to contest seizure of guns left at a pawn shop

D.N.H.: Bail conditions can permit otherwise illegal searches of the person; same as parole search

Officers had reasonable suspicion to conduct a patdown of the defendant. Even if they didn’t, a bail condition of his would have permitted it. United States v. Drane, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88729 (D. N.H. June 30, 2014):

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.H.: Bail conditions can permit otherwise illegal searches of the person; same as parole search

OH10: Suppression motion arguing stop wasn’t valid doesn’t include whether frisk was reasonable; waived on appeal

The suppression argument that the stop was invalid doesn’t raise the issue of whether the frisk of defendant’s person was reasonable. Therefore, the frisk issue isn’t before the appeals court. Defendant even objected to testimony about the frisk. [¶ 10] … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH10: Suppression motion arguing stop wasn’t valid doesn’t include whether frisk was reasonable; waived on appeal

WA: State can comment at trial on refusal to take FST

Because there is no constitutional right to refuse an FST, the state can comment on it at trial. State v. Mecham, 2014 Wash. App. LEXIS 1541 (June 23, 2014): ¶39 Mecham did not have a constitutional right to refuse consent … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WA: State can comment at trial on refusal to take FST

N.D.Ga.: Summers and Bailey don’t apply where there is probable cause

Michigan v. Summers (1981) and Bailey v. United States (2013) don’t even apply where there is independent probable cause for the suspect. This motion to suppress is “patently meritless.” United States v. Bocanegra, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86481 (N.D. Ga. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Summers and Bailey don’t apply where there is probable cause

GA: Defendant’s effort to distance himself from drugs led to no standing

Defendant’s effort to distance himself from drugs led to no standing. “Barlow testified that only his mother, stepfather, and brother lived at the Sherbrooke Way residence, and he denied currently living at the residence or having a bedroom there. Barlow … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on GA: Defendant’s effort to distance himself from drugs led to no standing

W.D.Pa.: “Cell phones and firearms are generally considered the ‘tools of the trade’ of drug traffickers”

“Cell phones and firearms are generally considered the ‘tools of the trade’ of drug traffickers, which the involved detectives fully understood and conveyed to the magistrate judge. … United States v. Jones, Cr. 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54575 (E.D. Pa. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: “Cell phones and firearms are generally considered the ‘tools of the trade’ of drug traffickers”

W.D.N.C.: Gov’t civil case for police targeting Hispanic motorists proceeds on 14th Amd. claim

“The United States of America (the ‘Government’) allege that Defendant Terry S. Johnson, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Alamance County, North Carolina, engaged in a pattern or practice of discriminatory law enforcement activities directed against Latinos, in violation … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Roadblocks | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Gov’t civil case for police targeting Hispanic motorists proceeds on 14th Amd. claim

IN: After express consent, leading officers through the house was implied consent

Defendant first gave express consent and then led them through the house. Defendant’s mother’s consent was also voluntary and she was warned by the consent form that she could refuse the search. Once officers were inside, defendant’s making a “bee … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IN: After express consent, leading officers through the house was implied consent

Cato: Police Ignorance of the Law Is No Excuse (re: Heien v. North Carolina)

Cato: Police Ignorance of the Law Is No Excuse (re: Hein v. North Carolina) by Ilya Shapiro: To execute any search or seizure, a police officer must reasonably suspect that a crime has been or is being committed based on … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Cato: Police Ignorance of the Law Is No Excuse (re: Heien v. North Carolina)

W.D.Wis.: Parole absconder hiding in hotel room of another had no standing

Defendant was a guest of a guest in a hotel room, and he was an absconder from supervision and had committed a new crime and was on the run. The question of guest standing is discussed at length, and there’s … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: Parole absconder hiding in hotel room of another had no standing

KY: State gets to argue standing on appeal even though it didn’t raise it below

Although the state didn’t raise standing below, it gets to based on the theory of “affirming on any ground shown by the record.” The record here showed no standing in the defendant’s grandfather’s house where he was running a meth … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on KY: State gets to argue standing on appeal even though it didn’t raise it below

OH9: Officer could inquire of car that obviously did not belong in the driveway where it was seen

An officer on patrol saw a car parked in a driveway that he knew didn’t belong. He ran the LPN and it was not registered to the owner, so he approached the driver and saw him drinking behind the wheel. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on OH9: Officer could inquire of car that obviously did not belong in the driveway where it was seen

OH12: RS for DUI doesn’t support calling drug dog; new RS needed for that

Defendant was pulled over for having no rear bumper. Reasonable suspicion developed for DUI based on the smell of alcohol, but when the officer called for a drug dog, he needed separate reasonable suspicion for that. The first detention and … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH12: RS for DUI doesn’t support calling drug dog; new RS needed for that

CA5: Arrest warrant authorized entry to arrest in defendant’s home

Defendant’s Franks challenge fails because the information omitted isn’t material at all to the outcome. Officers used an arrest warrant to gain entry and they reasonably believed she was there. After all, she answered the door. A protective sweep doesn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: Arrest warrant authorized entry to arrest in defendant’s home