Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

TX4: Private security guards’ detention for police was based on reasonable suspicion

The Texas exclusionary rule applies to private actors. The club security guards here had at least reasonable suspicion to detain and handcuff defendant for attempting to sell cocaine in the club as a citizen’s detention, akin to a citizen’s arrest. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX4: Private security guards’ detention for police was based on reasonable suspicion

OR: Furtive gesture alone in OR not enough, but here there was more

Defendant was smoking in a car in a subdivision being developed, so it couldn’t be called a high crime area. A citizen informant called in that the case was suspicious, so an officer was dispatched to see. When defendant saw … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: Furtive gesture alone in OR not enough, but here there was more

PA: Re-engaging driver with questions after saying he’s free to leave is a second stop

When defendant during a traffic stop is told he is free to leave and the officer starts to go back to the patrol car, but returns to re-engage the driver, that is a second stop requiring reasonable suspicion. No reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: Re-engaging driver with questions after saying he’s free to leave is a second stop

CA9: Once criminal proceedings are over, the original search isn’t an issue in Rule 41(g) proceedings for return of property

Defendant’s Rule 41(g) motion was granted in part and denied in part. The district court did not err in refusing to reconsider the original search question. “[I]n the context of Rule 41, that after criminal proceedings are completed, ‘the legality … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA9: Once criminal proceedings are over, the original search isn’t an issue in Rule 41(g) proceedings for return of property

NJ: Codefendant’s appeal not law of the case; parties get to argue their own cases

The decision in a co-defendant’s separate appeal on a search and seizure question is not “law of the case” as to another defendant’s appeal. The law of the case doctrine requires the same parties, and it would offend due process … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NJ: Codefendant’s appeal not law of the case; parties get to argue their own cases

IA: Where owner of car was a woman with a revoked DL, the officer didn’t see it was a man driving until he got to the driver’s window

The officer ran the LPN of the vehicle in front of him, and the owner, a woman, came back with a revoked DL. He stopped the car. When he got to the driver’s door, he saw a man, and then … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: Where owner of car was a woman with a revoked DL, the officer didn’t see it was a man driving until he got to the driver’s window

C.D.Cal.: Merely hiding something in a car doesn’t create standing

Defendant was accused of breaking into USPS mailboxes and stealing mail. He failed to show standing in the car he was stopped in. He claimed to own it, having just bought it from a guy whose name he didn’t know, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Merely hiding something in a car doesn’t create standing

Big win for individual liberty: SCOTUS: Bringing out the drug dog as a matter of course during a traffic stop is unreasonable; CA8’s “de minimus” extension of stop rule violates Fourth Amendment

Rodriguez v. United States, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 2807 (April 21, 2015). The syllabus: Officer Struble, a K–9 officer, stopped petitioner Rodriguez for driving on a highway shoulder, a violation of Nebraska law. After Struble attended to everything relating to the … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Big win for individual liberty: SCOTUS: Bringing out the drug dog as a matter of course during a traffic stop is unreasonable; CA8’s “de minimus” extension of stop rule violates Fourth Amendment

NJ: No cause shown to order passenger out of car under state law

Under New Jersey law, the driver can per se be ordered out of the car under Mimms, but not so with the passenger. Here, the trial court’s initial findings didn’t resolve this, and it was previously remanded. After the remand, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NJ: No cause shown to order passenger out of car under state law

D.Ariz.: There is standing in a borrowed cell phone; no justification here for search

Defendant’s denial of ownership of a cell phone in his car was not determinative of his standing to challenge its search. Actually, he was loaned the phone because his was broken, and he was legitimately in possession. The question posed … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: There is standing in a borrowed cell phone; no justification here for search

CA3: Use of a police baton on legs to subdue struggling suspect was reasonable; SI of fleeing suspect reasonable and based on fact

Defendant was pulled over for possible speeding in a 25 mph zone, and he fled the car, tugging at his pants as he was running, strongly suggesting a gun in his pocket or waistband. One officer tackled him and had … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA3: Use of a police baton on legs to subdue struggling suspect was reasonable; SI of fleeing suspect reasonable and based on fact

E.D.Mich.: Reasonable to infer that robbers usually keep weapons and proceeds at home

It was a reasonable inference that a suspected robber would keep the weapons used and the proceeds of the robbery in his house. In any event, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Morgan, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48758 … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Reasonable to infer that robbers usually keep weapons and proceeds at home

DE: Nervousness, 3 cell phones, past drug conviction, old alias not used not RS beyond a mere patdown; extension of stop unreasonable

The stop was for speeding, 48/25. Defendant’s extreme nervousness and criminal history for drugs and weapons and an old alias justified his patdown for weapons. Defendant was previously asked for consent to search the car and declined. The extension of … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on DE: Nervousness, 3 cell phones, past drug conviction, old alias not used not RS beyond a mere patdown; extension of stop unreasonable

D.Kan.: Def’s supervised release condition did not amount to consent to a search of his computer; he could refuse under risk of revo

The terms of defendant’s supervised release for his child pornography conviction provide that he is subject to a search on reasonable suspicion, but he can refuse and risk revocation if it is not well taken. The condition the government relies … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Def’s supervised release condition did not amount to consent to a search of his computer; he could refuse under risk of revo

OR: State fails on probation search justification by not developing it in trial court

The state conceded that the stop was unreasonably extended, but argued inevitable discovery because defendant was on probation and the search of her purse was a product of that. She’d refused consent to search her purse, and then her being … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: State fails on probation search justification by not developing it in trial court

IL: IAC where defendant would have won nonappealed search issue

Defense counsel was ineffective in not appealing a valid motion to suppress that had been denied by the trial court but, on the merits, would have been reversed. Going to the merits of the search and seizure claim, defendant would … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IL: IAC where defendant would have won nonappealed search issue

AR: Mere color discrepancy between the DMV record and what the car looks like is not reasonable suspicion

Mere color discrepancy between the DMV record and what the car looks like is not reasonable suspicion, following FL3 and CA7. Schneider v. State, 2015 Ark. 152 (April 9, 2015), rev’g 2014 Ark. App. 711, 492 S.W.3d 601:

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AR: Mere color discrepancy between the DMV record and what the car looks like is not reasonable suspicion

CT: CSLI was harmless error, even if unreasonably obtained

Even if the cell site location data for defendant’s phone was unreasonably obtained, it showed only that his phone was in the area of the crime not him, and he attempted to rebut it by claiming that his truck was … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CT: CSLI was harmless error, even if unreasonably obtained

MS: Search warrant to seize cell phone fairly includes ability to search it

The search warrant to seize defendant’s cell phone, fairly read, permitted a search of the phone for photographs of defendant’s sexual battery of the victim. Moore v. State, 2015 Miss. App. LEXIS 182 (April 7, 2015). The invalidity of the … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MS: Search warrant to seize cell phone fairly includes ability to search it

CA10: Ptf’s Fourth Amendment claim here creates a Heck bar to relief

Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment 1983 claim was barred by Heck v. Humphrey. He also did nothing to controvert the probable cause affidavit of the police. Lemmons v. Clymer, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 5484 (10th Cir. April 6, 2015).* Defendant’s argument that … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: Ptf’s Fourth Amendment claim here creates a Heck bar to relief