Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

KY: Defendant who refused consent for blood test and got no breath test has no Fourth Amendment claim that he wasn’t breath tested

Defendant was stopped for traffic offenses and smelled of alcohol. He refused consent to search his blood for his BAC, and the officer did not offer him a breath test. Thus, he had no “standing” because of no injury in … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KY: Defendant who refused consent for blood test and got no breath test has no Fourth Amendment claim that he wasn’t breath tested

W.D.Tex. credits motorist and passenger over officer and finds no reasonable suspicion

In a rare occurrence, the Western District of Texas at El Paso believed the motorist and passenger over the officer about the reasonable suspicion for the stop. The defendant had been stopped four times in a short period of time, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Tex. credits motorist and passenger over officer and finds no reasonable suspicion

OH10: Emergency or hot pursuit didn’t justify entry during knock-and-talk

Bike patrol officers smelled burning marijuana, and that led to them to a hotel room. When they knocked, defendant opened the door and they barged in. The entry was unlawful and couldn’t be sustained under any emergency or hot pursuit … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, Knock and talk, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH10: Emergency or hot pursuit didn’t justify entry during knock-and-talk

OR: Refusal to consent to a search of purse can’t even be a factor in reasonable suspicion

Defendant’s refusal to consent to a search of her purse can’t even be a factor in reasonable suspicion. Moreover, information about past or even recent drug use isn’t reasonable suspicion of drug use at a later time. State v. Barker, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: Refusal to consent to a search of purse can’t even be a factor in reasonable suspicion

CA6: Handcuffing for open carry in Ohio stated a claim; no qualified immunity

The Ohio legislature decided that open carry is permissible with a CCW. Plaintiff was stopped and handcuffed for thirty minutes and let go. He states a claim and qualified immunity is no defense. “Where it is lawful to possess a … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Handcuffing for open carry in Ohio stated a claim; no qualified immunity

WaPo: The Fourth Amendment and open carry of guns (where such open carry is legal)

WaPo: The Fourth Amendment and open carry of guns (where such open carry is legal) by Eugene Volokh: From the Sixth Circuit federal court of appeals decision today in Northrup v. Toledo Police Dept.: On a midsummer evening, Shawn and … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WaPo: The Fourth Amendment and open carry of guns (where such open carry is legal)

CA3: Three connected cases

When the officer went to an apartment in response to a shots fired call, and defendant came running out knocking the officer over, that was reasonable suspicion to detain him. The crack in his hand was dropped. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on CA3: Three connected cases

D.Md.: When a business is in receivership, the receiver is the one with standing

Defendant lacked standing because the receiver of the business was the only one with standing. United States v. Cohen, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60840 (D. Md. May 7, 2015) (Treatise § 12.52 n.1). A drug dog’s alert on the passenger … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on D.Md.: When a business is in receivership, the receiver is the one with standing

TX4: Private security guards’ detention for police was based on reasonable suspicion

The Texas exclusionary rule applies to private actors. The club security guards here had at least reasonable suspicion to detain and handcuff defendant for attempting to sell cocaine in the club as a citizen’s detention, akin to a citizen’s arrest. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX4: Private security guards’ detention for police was based on reasonable suspicion

OR: Furtive gesture alone in OR not enough, but here there was more

Defendant was smoking in a car in a subdivision being developed, so it couldn’t be called a high crime area. A citizen informant called in that the case was suspicious, so an officer was dispatched to see. When defendant saw … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: Furtive gesture alone in OR not enough, but here there was more

PA: Re-engaging driver with questions after saying he’s free to leave is a second stop

When defendant during a traffic stop is told he is free to leave and the officer starts to go back to the patrol car, but returns to re-engage the driver, that is a second stop requiring reasonable suspicion. No reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: Re-engaging driver with questions after saying he’s free to leave is a second stop

CA9: Once criminal proceedings are over, the original search isn’t an issue in Rule 41(g) proceedings for return of property

Defendant’s Rule 41(g) motion was granted in part and denied in part. The district court did not err in refusing to reconsider the original search question. “[I]n the context of Rule 41, that after criminal proceedings are completed, ‘the legality … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA9: Once criminal proceedings are over, the original search isn’t an issue in Rule 41(g) proceedings for return of property

NJ: Codefendant’s appeal not law of the case; parties get to argue their own cases

The decision in a co-defendant’s separate appeal on a search and seizure question is not “law of the case” as to another defendant’s appeal. The law of the case doctrine requires the same parties, and it would offend due process … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NJ: Codefendant’s appeal not law of the case; parties get to argue their own cases

IA: Where owner of car was a woman with a revoked DL, the officer didn’t see it was a man driving until he got to the driver’s window

The officer ran the LPN of the vehicle in front of him, and the owner, a woman, came back with a revoked DL. He stopped the car. When he got to the driver’s door, he saw a man, and then … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: Where owner of car was a woman with a revoked DL, the officer didn’t see it was a man driving until he got to the driver’s window

C.D.Cal.: Merely hiding something in a car doesn’t create standing

Defendant was accused of breaking into USPS mailboxes and stealing mail. He failed to show standing in the car he was stopped in. He claimed to own it, having just bought it from a guy whose name he didn’t know, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Merely hiding something in a car doesn’t create standing

Big win for individual liberty: SCOTUS: Bringing out the drug dog as a matter of course during a traffic stop is unreasonable; CA8’s “de minimus” extension of stop rule violates Fourth Amendment

Rodriguez v. United States, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 2807 (April 21, 2015). The syllabus: Officer Struble, a K–9 officer, stopped petitioner Rodriguez for driving on a highway shoulder, a violation of Nebraska law. After Struble attended to everything relating to the … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Big win for individual liberty: SCOTUS: Bringing out the drug dog as a matter of course during a traffic stop is unreasonable; CA8’s “de minimus” extension of stop rule violates Fourth Amendment

NJ: No cause shown to order passenger out of car under state law

Under New Jersey law, the driver can per se be ordered out of the car under Mimms, but not so with the passenger. Here, the trial court’s initial findings didn’t resolve this, and it was previously remanded. After the remand, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NJ: No cause shown to order passenger out of car under state law

D.Ariz.: There is standing in a borrowed cell phone; no justification here for search

Defendant’s denial of ownership of a cell phone in his car was not determinative of his standing to challenge its search. Actually, he was loaned the phone because his was broken, and he was legitimately in possession. The question posed … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: There is standing in a borrowed cell phone; no justification here for search

CA3: Use of a police baton on legs to subdue struggling suspect was reasonable; SI of fleeing suspect reasonable and based on fact

Defendant was pulled over for possible speeding in a 25 mph zone, and he fled the car, tugging at his pants as he was running, strongly suggesting a gun in his pocket or waistband. One officer tackled him and had … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA3: Use of a police baton on legs to subdue struggling suspect was reasonable; SI of fleeing suspect reasonable and based on fact

E.D.Mich.: Reasonable to infer that robbers usually keep weapons and proceeds at home

It was a reasonable inference that a suspected robber would keep the weapons used and the proceeds of the robbery in his house. In any event, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Morgan, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48758 … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Reasonable to infer that robbers usually keep weapons and proceeds at home