KY: Defendant who refused consent for blood test and got no breath test has no Fourth Amendment claim that he wasn’t breath tested

Defendant was stopped for traffic offenses and smelled of alcohol. He refused consent to search his blood for his BAC, and the officer did not offer him a breath test. Thus, he had no “standing” because of no injury in fact from no search of his blood under McNeely. Commonwealth v. Duncan, 2015 Ky. LEXIS 1614 (May 14, 2015).

An identified citizen reported to an officer a young black male in a black hoodie carrying an Uzi-like gun with a long clip sticking out of it at a school athletic field. The officer was on the scene within 30 seconds. One person in the area had a black hoodie, and he was taking it off, laying it on the bleachers. As the officer approached, he slid away from the folded hoodie. Based on the citizen report, the officer had reasonable suspicion to open up the hoodie and found a gun, which was on school grounds. D.F. v. State, 2015 Ind. App. LEXIS 398 (May 13, 2015).

This entry was posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.