Category Archives: Dog sniff

ID: Dog putting nose in open window of car wasn’t search; it was dog following smell

A drug dog putting his nose up to the open window during an exterior dog sniff was not a search of the interior. The officers didn’t tell him to do it, and the dog was just following his smell (citing … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Drug or alcohol testing, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on ID: Dog putting nose in open window of car wasn’t search; it was dog following smell

AZ: Dog sniff in hotel hallway and knock-and-talk thereafter not unreasonable

About midnight, officers did a dog sniff in the hallway of defendant’s hotel, and the dog alerted on defendant’s door. There was no reasonable expectation of privacy in the hotel hallway, and hotel management permitted the dog to come in. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on AZ: Dog sniff in hotel hallway and knock-and-talk thereafter not unreasonable

D.Kan.: LPN being unassigned was justification for a stop and then the use of a drug dog wasn’t unreasonable

Defendant’s stop was based on the LPN coming back “not assigned,” and then the officer smelled alcohol on him. The use of the drug dog during all this did not extend the stop and was not unreasonable. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Kan.: LPN being unassigned was justification for a stop and then the use of a drug dog wasn’t unreasonable

OH12: Where there is PC for automobile exception, drug dog’s failure to alert doesn’t mean no PC

When there is probable cause to search a car, a drug dog’s failure to alert is not proof there is no probable cause. In addition, to be safe, the officers got a warrant and told the magistrate the dog didn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Dog sniff | Comments Off on OH12: Where there is PC for automobile exception, drug dog’s failure to alert doesn’t mean no PC

WaPo: Federal appeals court: Drug dog that’s barely more accurate than a coin flip is good enough

WaPo: Federal appeals court: Drug dog that’s barely more accurate than a coin flip is good enough by Radley Balko: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued a troubling ruling about drug dogs last week. U.S. v. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on WaPo: Federal appeals court: Drug dog that’s barely more accurate than a coin flip is good enough

IL: Stopping writing citation to do a dog sniff without justification unlawfully extended the stop

The officer unlawfully prolonged the duration of the stop when he interrupted his traffic citation preparation to conduct a dog sniff based on an unparticularized suspicion of criminal activity. There was no dispute that the dog sniff added time to … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Stopping writing citation to do a dog sniff without justification unlawfully extended the stop

D.Md.: When a business is in receivership, the receiver is the one with standing

Defendant lacked standing because the receiver of the business was the only one with standing. United States v. Cohen, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60840 (D. Md. May 7, 2015) (Treatise § 12.52 n.1). A drug dog’s alert on the passenger … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on D.Md.: When a business is in receivership, the receiver is the one with standing

CA8: Circuit authority authorized dog sniff at door before Jardines so good faith applies

A pre-Jardines dog sniff outside the door was valid in this circuit, and the court has already sustained on good faith such a sniff in United States v. Davis, 760 F.3d 901, 903, 905 (8th Cir. 2014). United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA8: Circuit authority authorized dog sniff at door before Jardines so good faith applies

D.Mass.: USPS tracks persons tracking suspicious packages by their IP addresses

This mere bailee didn’t have any right to control the package that was shipped, and he thus didn’t have standing to challenge its search, at least recognizing that some bailees might with better facts. More importantly, the government tracked the … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on D.Mass.: USPS tracks persons tracking suspicious packages by their IP addresses

E.D.N.C.: Court doesn’t credit that officer smelled marijuana

Court doesn’t credit that officer smelled marijuana and suppresses search for lack of probable cause to search the person. Video of stop and car search was instrumental. United States v. Price, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52734 (E.D. N.C. April 22, … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Court doesn’t credit that officer smelled marijuana

Columbus Dispatch: Supreme Court ruling on drug-dog searches should have little effect in Ohio

Columbus Dispatch: Supreme Court ruling on drug-dog searches should have little effect in Ohio by Alan Johnson: Officials with the Ohio State Highway Patrol and Columbus police said they already follow a procedure in which officers must have a reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on Columbus Dispatch: Supreme Court ruling on drug-dog searches should have little effect in Ohio

CA11: Maybe the first Rodriguez casualty and decided the same day

This case decided the same day as Rodriguez should be now be reversed. In this cryptic opinion, a traffic stop appears to have led to the use of a drug dog for no apparent reason, and the dog alerted. No … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on CA11: Maybe the first Rodriguez casualty and decided the same day

Big win for individual liberty: SCOTUS: Bringing out the drug dog as a matter of course during a traffic stop is unreasonable; CA8’s “de minimus” extension of stop rule violates Fourth Amendment

Rodriguez v. United States, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 2807 (April 21, 2015). The syllabus: Officer Struble, a K–9 officer, stopped petitioner Rodriguez for driving on a highway shoulder, a violation of Nebraska law. After Struble attended to everything relating to the … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Big win for individual liberty: SCOTUS: Bringing out the drug dog as a matter of course during a traffic stop is unreasonable; CA8’s “de minimus” extension of stop rule violates Fourth Amendment

CA9: Parole search includes the car the parolee was driving when stopped

Defendant’s argument that a parole search of a parolee driving a car can’t include the car is rejected. A gun was found hidden under the cover the of gearshift lever. United States v. Bautista, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 4798 (9th … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA9: Parole search includes the car the parolee was driving when stopped

OH11: Intentionally delaying issuing ticket to give dog time to arrive where no RS is unreasonable

Intentionally delaying issuing a noise ticket to give the drug dog time to arrive made the stop unreasonable because there was no reasonable suspicion of drug activity. State v. Eggleston, 2015-Ohio-958, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 928 (11th Dist. March 16, … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH11: Intentionally delaying issuing ticket to give dog time to arrive where no RS is unreasonable

IN: Pre-Jardines dog sniff of front door suppressed

Defendant had an interlocutory appeal of a search issue, and law of the case controls that. Jardines was, however, decided one month after the appeal, and defendant can raise it on appeal now because it was preserved, and it controls. … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on IN: Pre-Jardines dog sniff of front door suppressed

CA2: Successive stops in two states within minutes are individually evaluated; performance records of dog discoverable

Defendant was a regular drug courier between NYC and Burlington VT. He was stopped first in Massachusetts and detained for 22 minutes because the paperwork on the rental car was suspect. The rental car company said there was no problem … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA2: Successive stops in two states within minutes are individually evaluated; performance records of dog discoverable

WI: Pre-Jardines dog sniff of house saved by GFE and “unsettled law”; is the Fourth Amendment always subservient to good faith?

A pre-Jardines dog sniff of defendant’s door that led to a search warrant would not be suppressed because of “unsettled law” at the time of this search. [There were only a couple of reported cases.] The warrant application was vetted … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Good faith exception | Comments Off on WI: Pre-Jardines dog sniff of house saved by GFE and “unsettled law”; is the Fourth Amendment always subservient to good faith?

S.D.W.Va.: There was reasonable suspicion for a slight delay of an Express Mail package

“In what has become a large line of cases, a number of federal circuits have found that a combination of similar factors created reasonable suspicion to seize a package. The Court has no problem finding reasonable suspicion based solely on … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: There was reasonable suspicion for a slight delay of an Express Mail package

IL: Pre-Jardines dog sniff at apartment door at 3:20 am violated curtilage

The police used a drug dog to sniff defendant’s apartment door at 3:20 am. That led to a search warrant and a search of the apartment. Then Jardines was decided, and defendant moved to suppress which was granted. The court … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff | Comments Off on IL: Pre-Jardines dog sniff at apartment door at 3:20 am violated curtilage