Category Archives: Ineffective assistance

FL1: No standing in disclaimed cell phone seized from own house

Defendant didn’t have standing to contest the seizure of cell phones she expressly disclaimed ownership in just because they were taken out of her house. State v. Fosmire, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5739 (Fla. 1st DCA April 22, 2014).* Defense … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on FL1: No standing in disclaimed cell phone seized from own house

M.D.La.: Smell of marijuana on traffic stop justified its continuation

“Corporal Spelying’s continued detention of the defendant to ask him questions regarding his suspended license and his travel itinerary did not violate the Fourth Amendment” because he could smell marijuana immediately into the stop. United States v. Robertson, 2014 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Smell of marijuana on traffic stop justified its continuation

W.D.Tex.: While Jardines rule violated, there was other PC so no suppression

There was a dog sniff at defendant’s house, and Jardines would apply, except that there was plenty of probable cause here without the dog sniff. Therefore, excluding that fact from the case, there was still probable cause for the search … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: While Jardines rule violated, there was other PC so no suppression

CA11: Pre-Jones GPS valid by good faith exception

Because there was clear precedent that GPS monitoring before Jones was valid, and at least by the Davis good faith exception, the GPS here was valid, too. During the pendency of this appeal, other cases so held. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA11: Pre-Jones GPS valid by good faith exception

D.Md.: Decision to plead rather than pursue suppression was valid strategic choice

2255 petitioner pled guilty rather than pursue the suppression motion. That was a valid strategic choice to get the 3 levels off the offense level for acceptance of responsibility. Nettles v. United States, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50963 (D. Md. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Leave a comment

E.D.Mich.: Just because the facts could be more specific is not a Franks challenge

Just because the facts could be more specific is not a Franks challenge. Here, probable cause was shown. United States v. Adams, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50090 (E.D. Mich. April 11, 2014).* 2255 petitioner’s IAC claim was based in small … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Just because the facts could be more specific is not a Franks challenge