CA3: Ptf’s § 1983 case implies invalidity of criminal case so it’s barred by Heck

Plaintiff’s fifth amended complaint necessarily implies the invalidity of his conviction and it’s barred by Heck v. Humphrey. Ollie v. Brown, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 8302 (3d Cir. May 2, 2014).

Defendant’s guilty plea waived any claim that the consent search of his bedroom was premised on immunity from the New Orleans Police Department if he consented. United States v. Harris, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60059 (E.D. La. April 29, 2014).*

Defendant claimed that the Fire Marshal illegally handled his boots before the arrest. That couldn’t have happened because defendant was wearing them when he was arrested. The sole print matched up with an arson scene. State v. Rodriguez, 2014 Del. Super. LEXIS 210 (April 14, 2014).*

A Baton Rouge police employee was justifiably terminated for telling a friend by text message when he was pulled over “Do not let them search.” Officers at the scene saw the message on the phone and it was usable in the termination hearing for conduct unbecoming. She was also associating with a known felon in violation of department policy. Moore v. City of Baton Rouge, 2014 La. App. LEXIS 1135 (La.App. 1 Cir. May 2, 2014).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Ineffective assistance, Police misconduct. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.