Category Archives: Ineffective assistance

E.D.Mich.: Def provided a cell phone to a minor he was trafficking for sex, and he had no REP in it even though he paid for it

Defendant was accused of sex trafficking a minor and provided her a cell phone. She had apparent authority to consent to search of the phone, and it was voluntarily given. United States v. Gardner, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128480 (E.D.Mich. … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, E-mail, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Def provided a cell phone to a minor he was trafficking for sex, and he had no REP in it even though he paid for it

E.D.Va.: Def claimed on post-conviction defense counsel promised win on motion to suppress; hearing has to be held

Defendant in his 2255 claimed defense counsel promised that he could win a motion to suppress. Defense counsel denied it, saying he reviewed the file and told defendant it was a hopeless motion. A hearing has to be held. United … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Def claimed on post-conviction defense counsel promised win on motion to suppress; hearing has to be held

D.Nev.: SW for def’s trailer for evidence of practicing medicine without a license didn’t support search of a safe

The probable cause was for search of defendant’s trailer for evidence of conducting an illegal medical practice. Nothing in the affidavit supported search of defendant’s safe inside the trailer which was broken open and then a warrant was obtained to … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Nev.: SW for def’s trailer for evidence of practicing medicine without a license didn’t support search of a safe

D.Utah: Use of the drug dog while the ticket is being written is reasonable

Running a drug dog around a car before the ticket is finished being written is reasonable under Cabelles and Rodriguez. United States v. Smith, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124158 (D.Utah Sept. 12, 2016). Defendants raised a Fourth Amendment IAC claim. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Utah: Use of the drug dog while the ticket is being written is reasonable

VA: Mobility for automobile exception doesn’t depend on fact def would be arrested as soon as he got on the motorcycle

The mobility basis for the automobile exception has nothing to do with whether the officer watching would have been able to apprehend defendant if he suddenly appeared and tried to drive the motorcycle off. “Moreover, ‘[a] vehicle’s inherent mobility—not the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on VA: Mobility for automobile exception doesn’t depend on fact def would be arrested as soon as he got on the motorcycle

N.D.Ga.: Statement at arrest car was girlfriend’s didn’t show standing; more required

Defendant’s post-arrest statement to the police that the car was his girlfriend’s wasn’t enough to show standing. He could have testified to standing without being cross-examined about the merits of the car, yet he didn’t. Defendant’s statement before arrest that … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Statement at arrest car was girlfriend’s didn’t show standing; more required

DE: Nervousness alone isn’t RS to extend a stop

Defendant’s motion to suppress is granted. About all the officer could show was that defendant was nervous, and that’s not reasonable suspicion to extend this stop. The questioning of defendant about his travel plans wasn’t any aid to the state … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DE: Nervousness alone isn’t RS to extend a stop

M.D.N.C.: In 4A IAC claim, defendant has to show standing in detail and vague allegations aren’t enough

Defendant’s IAC claim here depends on his having standing. His vague allegations of standing aren’t enough. Organes-Espino v. United States, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113536 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 25, 2016). The officer had reasonable suspicion defendant had been driving under the … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.N.C.: In 4A IAC claim, defendant has to show standing in detail and vague allegations aren’t enough

OH2: Odor of marijuana, air fresheners, and window down when it was 25º is RS

Odor of marijuana, air fresheners, and window down when it was 25º was reasonable suspicion. State v. Hicks, 2016-Ohio-5439, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 3341 (2d Dist. Aug. 19, 2016).* Plaintiff’s Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment tort claims denied in … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH2: Odor of marijuana, air fresheners, and window down when it was 25º is RS

TN: Not IAC to not object to def’s consent to statement and DNA sample

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not moving to suppress defendant’s volunteering to talk to police and give a DNA sample. It was clearly consensual. Jones v. State, 2016 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 595 (Aug. 11, 2016).* The plaintiffs’ family … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on TN: Not IAC to not object to def’s consent to statement and DNA sample

N.D.Ill.: Defense counsel was ineffective for not seeing def’s guest standing in girlfriend’s apartment

Defendant established a failure of performance of defense counsel in his 2255 for not filing a motion to suppress on guest standing. He didn’t file a motion to suppress solely because defendant said he didn’t “live at” his girlfriend’s place, … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Defense counsel was ineffective for not seeing def’s guest standing in girlfriend’s apartment

FL3: Consent to search bedroom was solely for cell phone; search of dresser after phone was found suppressed

Defendant signed a general consent for his bedroom, but the police told him they were only looking for a stolen cell phone. After they found the cell phone, they started searching his dresser drawers and found cocaine. The search exceeded … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Scope of search | Comments Off on FL3: Consent to search bedroom was solely for cell phone; search of dresser after phone was found suppressed

S.D.Ga.: Search issue mentioned in passing and not fleshed out is waived

“The felony probation-violation arrest warrant alone was all the police needed to arrest James at any time, so his warrantless seizure argument is simply frivolous.” Another argument mentioned in passing is treated as waived for failure to flesh it out. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Search issue mentioned in passing and not fleshed out is waived

TN: Not filing motion to suppress was best strategy to disassociate from house searched by not having to show standing

Defense counsel’s refusal to file a motion to suppress the search of the place defendant was found in was reasonable strategy to separate defendant from the drugs found in the house. To seek to suppress the search, defendant would have … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on TN: Not filing motion to suppress was best strategy to disassociate from house searched by not having to show standing

CA11: On habeas, because law was “murky” about transportation on RS for an eyewitness ID, counsel can’t be ineffective for not challenging it

The law was murky at the time, and still is, that a Terry stop includes moving a suspect for a possible victim ID without requiring probable cause. Focusing somewhat on the merits, but mostly on whether the Florida appellate court … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on CA11: On habeas, because law was “murky” about transportation on RS for an eyewitness ID, counsel can’t be ineffective for not challenging it

NY4: Consent shown voluntary; def showed police which key opened the front door

Consent found voluntary by pointing out which key opened the door: “Testimony at the suppression hearing established that, although defendant was in custody at the time he gave consent, he cooperated with the police and assisted them in gaining entry … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on NY4: Consent shown voluntary; def showed police which key opened the front door

OH5: Officer’s hand out for keys was not a request for consent

The officer had no cause to search defendant’s glove compartment as to whether the car was rented or stolen. When the officer came to him with hand outstretched for the keys, that was not consent. State v. Clark, 2016-Ohio-4614, 2016 … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH5: Officer’s hand out for keys was not a request for consent

AK: Protective sweep could precede probation search

The challenged part of the home search here was a protective sweep before a probation search, and it was reasonable. Elisoff v. State, 2016 Alas. App. LEXIS 118 (June 22, 2016) (mem.).* 2255 petitioner’s claim that his defense counsel was … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AK: Protective sweep could precede probation search

TX1: Cell phone was abandoned on roof of abandoned getaway car

The getaway car for a robbery was left outside the scene when the occupants got out of the car to shoot but scattered after gunfire. Defendant’s cell phone was left on the roof of the car. This was an abandonment … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on TX1: Cell phone was abandoned on roof of abandoned getaway car

CA10: State court’s harmlessness determination was binding under Stone v. Powell

Defendant raised the legality of a search in the trial court, but not everything that was seized. The court of criminal appeals considered the remainder and found it harmless error. On habeas, defendant had a full and fair opportunity to … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: State court’s harmlessness determination was binding under Stone v. Powell