IL: Refusal of consent to a parole search is a violation of parole conditions in itself

Under Illinois law, refusal of consent to a parole search is a violation of parole conditions in itself. That did not make the consent invalid. The court was entitled to believe he consented knowing that he had 800 g of cocaine in his car. People v. Collins, 2015 IL App (1st) 131145, 2015 Ill. App. LEXIS 702 (September 16, 2015).

Defendant was leaning back and hunched to the right of the driver’s seat of a parked car in a high crime area, and the officer reasonably believed there may be a motor vehicle theft in progress. That was sufficient to order defendant to show his hands and exit the car. United States v. Bridges, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 16587 (6th Cir. September 14, 2015).*

Defendant doesn’t show that the motion to suppress would have been granted, so defense counsel could not be ineffective. Officers responded to a report of man pointing a gun from a white Volvo, and they found the car. The windows were heavily tinted and they told the driver to show his hands. He moved his hands to his lap and they drew down on him. They approached with flashlights and saw the gun protruding from under the driver’s seat. The stop and search was valid. State v. Thomas, 2015 Del. Super. LEXIS 487 (September 8, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.