Category Archives: Ineffective assistance

GA: Def counsel wasn’t ineffective for not arguing more strenuously an issue raised and rejected

Defendant’s IAC claim here was that defense counsel didn’t argue more vigorously the motion to suppress such that he would have won it it had been better argued. How to argue is “strategy.” In light of his lack of standing, … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on GA: Def counsel wasn’t ineffective for not arguing more strenuously an issue raised and rejected

NY1: Issue of fact on PC precludes SJ of assault and battery claim

An “issue of fact as to probable cause for [an] arrest precludes summary dismissal of [an] assault and battery claim”. Burgos-Lugo v. City of New York, 2017 NY Slip Op 00534, 2017 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 536 (Jan. 26, 2017).* … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on NY1: Issue of fact on PC precludes SJ of assault and battery claim

E.D.Mich.: Squeezing bag of MJ when taking it off def wasn’t unreasonable; it was apparent what it was

Squeezing a baggie of suspected marijuana to sense its feel was not unreasonable, if that is part of defendant’s argument, which isn’t obvious. It was at arms length when seized, and its appearance was marijuana anyway. United States v. Barnes, … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Squeezing bag of MJ when taking it off def wasn’t unreasonable; it was apparent what it was

UT: Def counsel failed to provide effective assistance in getting 4A issue before court for resolution

Defense counsel failed to adequately defend the accused on his motion to suppress by not briefing and failing to get it before the court for a hearing, essentially abandoning the client. The issue was left cloudy enough in the record … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on UT: Def counsel failed to provide effective assistance in getting 4A issue before court for resolution

E.D.Tenn.: When state officers seize and hold property in federal case, return of property under Rule 41(g) not possible

State officers obtained a search warrant for defendant’s property which they held but was being used in a federal prosecution. Rule 41(g) does not enable the defendant to get return of property held by state officials even though there is … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: When state officers seize and hold property in federal case, return of property under Rule 41(g) not possible

CO: No IAC for not challenging P2P search of computer since no REP

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not challenging the search of defendant’s computer via a P2P connection on Limewire that resulted in his child pornography conviction. By going online via Limewire, defendant essentially opened his computer to the outside world, … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search incident | Comments Off on CO: No IAC for not challenging P2P search of computer since no REP

IAC of a search issue can’t prevail if the search was still valid

Defendant’s 2255 fails for a lack of prejudice because defendant can’t show that he’d prevail on the motion to suppress if it had been filed. (The government also argued that the plea agreement’s waiver provisions barred the 2255 because the … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on IAC of a search issue can’t prevail if the search was still valid

OR: Any exigency of def’s expressed suicidal thoughts had passed by the time officers searched her room

The trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress because the search of defendant’s bedroom did not fall within the emergency aid exception to warrant requirement in the state constitution. First, defendant was sitting outside the house when officers … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OR: Any exigency of def’s expressed suicidal thoughts had passed by the time officers searched her room

FL2: Fireman’s plain view of contraband was valid, but then there was a search that wasn’t

Contraband in plain view seen by firemen in defendant’s garage was lawfully seized. Guns and cash weren’t in plain view, and they were seen after a re-sweep of the house with the police, so they weren’t lawfully seized. Young v. … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on FL2: Fireman’s plain view of contraband was valid, but then there was a search that wasn’t

TN: Def’s children were missing after he was arrested for shooting his wife, so entry into house was based on exigency

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging the warrantless entry into defendant’s home. He was apprehended for shootings including shooting his wife, and their children were unaccounted for. The entry was valid based on exigency. Therefore, no IAC. Jordan v. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, E-mail, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on TN: Def’s children were missing after he was arrested for shooting his wife, so entry into house was based on exigency

E.D.Wash.: Defending on lack of connection to property was best course; no IAC for lack of standing, and if motion made it would have lost on merits, too

Defendant’s counsel wasn’t ineffective: “This Court unequivocally finds that Defendant manifested a deliberate abandonment to any interest in his neighbor’s shed. Counsel was not ineffective by tactically defending the charge by highlighting the absence of positive evidence tying Defendant to … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Wash.: Defending on lack of connection to property was best course; no IAC for lack of standing, and if motion made it would have lost on merits, too

S.D.Cal.: Admission of MJ in the trunk was PC; officer didn’t have to check on MMJ prescription

An admission defendant had marijuana in the trunk didn’t require the officer to check into whether defendant had a prescription for it. United States v. Robbins, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153558 (S.D.Cal. Nov. 3, 2016). Defense counsel did, in fact, … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration checkpoints, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Admission of MJ in the trunk was PC; officer didn’t have to check on MMJ prescription

E.D.Pa.: CSLI warrant upheld

CSLI warrant upheld: “ The cell site data obtained by the government is admissible because the government’s actions did not constitute a ‘search’ falling under the protection of the Fourth Amendment. Even if the government had violated the Fourth Amendment, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Ineffective assistance, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: CSLI warrant upheld

GA: Search incident of def’s backpack six days after arrest was void

Defense counsel at trial provided ineffective assistance when he failed to seek suppression of evidence recovered from defendant’s backpacks, that were searched six days after defendant’s arrest. The search incident to arrest exception was not applicable to the search that … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Search incident, Uncategorized | Comments Off on GA: Search incident of def’s backpack six days after arrest was void

CA10: Def would lose 4A issue in any event, so no IAC

2255 petitioner argued that state appellate counsel was ineffective for not challenging trial counsel’s ineffectiveness in failing to argue a knock-and-talk. The knock-and-talk would be valid in any event, so there can’t be any IAC. Moore v. McCollum, 2016 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Knock and talk, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: Def would lose 4A issue in any event, so no IAC

OR: Def’s SDT for narrow computer files of alleged rape victim was reasonable when it pertained to credibility

Defendant was accused of rape, and the victim told others she had searched Google for information about rape under Oregon law shortly afterward. Defendant sought production of her Google search history to attempt to attack her credibility. The state could … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Ineffective assistance, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on OR: Def’s SDT for narrow computer files of alleged rape victim was reasonable when it pertained to credibility

CA8: Detention of def’s semi for SW on PC was reasonable

Defendant was not in custody in this child pornography investigation when he was interrogated, and he even left the scene. “In light of the background investigation and Zavesky’s statements, law enforcement officers had probable cause to detain Zavesky’s semi-truck after … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on CA8: Detention of def’s semi for SW on PC was reasonable

OH9: With smell of MJ, car doesn’t have to be searched before the dog does its work

The smell of marijuana coming from the car was sufficient to call for a drug dog to sniff the car. The officer wasn’t required to search the passenger compartment before the dog sniff. State v. Ross, 2016-Ohio-7082, 2016 Ohio App. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH9: With smell of MJ, car doesn’t have to be searched before the dog does its work

OH9: Nine air fresheners on mirror and one on each air vent was RS

Defendant had nine air fresheners hanging from the rearview mirror and one over every air vent. That was reasonable suspicion to utilize a drug dog during the computer checks and then another officer running a dog around the car while … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH9: Nine air fresheners on mirror and one on each air vent was RS

M.D.Fla.: Even if def counsel filed and won suppression motion, would outcome of case be different?

On a search and seizure IAC claim, too, only the Strickland prejudice prong needs to be considered. Even if the evidence were suppressed, would the jury have still convicted? If yes, then no prejudice. Pittman v. United States, 2016 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Even if def counsel filed and won suppression motion, would outcome of case be different?