Category Archives: Ineffective assistance

E.D.Pa.: Tearing down plaintiff’s building was a seizure under Soldal

Tearing down plaintiff’s building was a seizure under Soldal. The record thus far precludes summary judgment. Dvortsova v. City of Philadelphia, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23868 (E.D.Pa. Feb. 9, 2022). Defendant’s 2255 claim that defense counsel was ineffective for not … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Tearing down plaintiff’s building was a seizure under Soldal

NY2: Def stated IAC claim that defense counsel never looked at SW materials

Defendant stated a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel that defense counsel never obtained the search warrant materials to even investigate. Reversed to have the state produce it. People v. Tindley, 2022 NY Slip Op 00886, 2022 N.Y. App. Div. … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on NY2: Def stated IAC claim that defense counsel never looked at SW materials

NC: Objection to seized evidence without a motion to suppress is waiver

Defendant objected at trial to admission of evidence, but it was not a timely motion to suppress. It is waived. State v. Draughon, 2022-NCCOA-58, 2022 N.C. App. LEXIS 53 (Feb. 1, 2022). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not moving to … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Waiver | Comments Off on NC: Objection to seized evidence without a motion to suppress is waiver

N.D.Ga.: 6 day delay in getting SW for seized cell phones not unreasonable

There was a six day delay between seizure of six cell phones and issuance of a search warrant for them. This was reasonable under CA11 precedent. Moreover, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Norwood, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: 6 day delay in getting SW for seized cell phones not unreasonable

MO: Prosecutor can’t be sued for making a file decision based on the search of ptf’s computer

Plaintiff sued a prosecutor for various things including the “privacy tort ‘of unreasonable intrusion into private facts.’” His computer was searched under a warrant and potential privileged material was obtained. Plaintiff’s own complaint says the prosecutor was given the information … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on MO: Prosecutor can’t be sued for making a file decision based on the search of ptf’s computer

D.Colo.: No REP in the “people’s house” on 1/6 because ptf wasn’t there

Plaintiff is an attorney pro se alleging, inter alia, a Fourth Amendment violation in Colorado against a member of the House of Representatives for the January 6th insurrection. He claims a Fourth Amendment in the “people’s house” when he doesn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Colo.: No REP in the “people’s house” on 1/6 because ptf wasn’t there

CA7: Record supported finding that stop was not unreasonably extended

Whether a traffic stop was unreasonably extended for a drug dog to arrive is reviewed for clear error. The stop here was for overtinting, and the officer processed a warning by entering the information into the patrol car’s computer. He … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, DNA, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA7: Record supported finding that stop was not unreasonably extended

DE: Def counsel not ineffective for not forecasting Jones GPS case

“Because the Court will not find trial counsel ineffective for failing to ‘effectively’ raise an issue of first impression [on GPS placement], and because the Court believes that even if he had done so effectively, the issue would not have … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on DE: Def counsel not ineffective for not forecasting Jones GPS case

CA1: Def preserved Rodriguez argument without citing it

Defendant preserved his Rodriguez argument by stating that the stop was continued without reasonable suspicion but not citing the case. Nevertheless, he loses on the merits. United States v. Reyes, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 1417 (1st Cir. Jan. 19, 2022). … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Exclusionary rule, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA1: Def preserved Rodriguez argument without citing it

Never 4A IAC without a meritorious claim

“Movant is not entitled to relief on Ground One because he fails to show that a motion to suppress on such grounds would have been meritorious because (1) his detention during the search was not unlawful and (2) he fails … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on Never 4A IAC without a meritorious claim

CA4: Conclusory allegations don’t satisfy Franks

“In arguing that he was entitled to a Franks hearing, Landaverde-Giron relies only on his own conclusory allegations to demonstrate intentional falsity or reckless disregard for the truth by the affiant. He points to no evidence supporting his conclusion that … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA4: Conclusory allegations don’t satisfy Franks

CO: Particularity of cell phone SW was harmless error and didn’t even have to be decided

Defendant’s claim that his cell phone search warrant violated the particularity requirement does not have to be decided because, if error, it is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt on this record. Pettigrew v. People, 2022 CO 2, 2022 Colo. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CO: Particularity of cell phone SW was harmless error and didn’t even have to be decided

MT: Lawyer suspended for telling client to refuse to cooperate in execution of a SW

A lawyer telling his girlfriend-client to refuse to cooperate in DUI blood draw by search warrant is suspended for 30 days. Multiple officers were ultimately involved with a restraint chair brought in before she relented. The lawyer was also convicted … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Ineffective assistance, Neutral and detached magistrate, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MT: Lawyer suspended for telling client to refuse to cooperate in execution of a SW

N.D.Ohio: Not IAC to not raise every suppression issue def wants

Defense counsel had the discretion not to make every argument defendant wanted on a suppression motion. “It is well within counsel’s constitutional discretion to make the decision to raise or not raise certain arguments at a suppression hearing. That counsel … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Not IAC to not raise every suppression issue def wants

CA6: Torres v. Madrid not a new constitutional rule for successor habeas

Torres v. Madrid did not announce a new constitutional rule for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim in a successor habeas. In re Foster, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 141 (6th Cir. Jan. 3, 2022). “Considering that reasonable suspicion ‘is not, … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Torres v. Madrid not a new constitutional rule for successor habeas

TN: Even if a viable motion to suppress existed, it was reasonable strategy to work a plea deal considering all the evidence of guilt

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not filing a suppression motion and working a plea deal instead. First, with the mountain of evidence against defendant, it was wise to work out a deal and avoid sentencing after trial for sexual assault … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on TN: Even if a viable motion to suppress existed, it was reasonable strategy to work a plea deal considering all the evidence of guilt

N.D.Ill.: Criminal history questions during traffic stop reasonably related to officer safety

“Officer Nisivaco’s questions about the offense for which Carson was on parole and the recency of his gun offense were permissible, ‘negligibly burdensome precautions’ taken to ensure officer safety. Rodriguez, 575 U.S. at 356.” Asking about whether he was up … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Criminal history questions during traffic stop reasonably related to officer safety

NY4: Evidence tech’s warrantless further search of premises unreasonable

The evidence technician’s testimony at the suppression hearing did not establish that a further search of the premises was necessary as part of an emergency. She knew dead person on the premises had already been pronounced when she got there. … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on NY4: Evidence tech’s warrantless further search of premises unreasonable

MA: Driver’s and passenger’s conduct during traffic stop helped create RS for frisk of passenger in backseat

During a traffic stop, the driver and front seat passenger were argumentative and threatening for a fight. The officers surmised that this was a distraction from the vehicle because it could have a firearm in it. On the totality, there … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MA: Driver’s and passenger’s conduct during traffic stop helped create RS for frisk of passenger in backseat

W.D.La.: In a § 1983 suit over a SW, informer privilege prevents disclosure here

In a § 1983 suit over a search warrant, the defendants plead informer privilege to prevent disclosure of the CI that led to the search. Denied. Informant privilege stronger in civil cases than criminal. There was also significant other information … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on W.D.La.: In a § 1983 suit over a SW, informer privilege prevents disclosure here