Category Archives: Good faith exception

N.D.Okla: Pre-McGirt state SW was obtained and executed in good faith

In a 2255, a state search warrant on Indian lands issued and executed 16 years before McGirt v. Oklahoma was not subject to suppression because it was obtained and executed in good faith based on law at the time. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on N.D.Okla: Pre-McGirt state SW was obtained and executed in good faith

Misc.

There was probable cause for the first and second search warrants for child pornography on defendant’s devices (took ~100 pages to say that). No exclusionary rule; good faith exception applies, too. United States v. Pena, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218914 … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Good faith exception, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on Misc.

E.D.Wis.: No hearing required on application of GFE; papers already show it

Defendant does not get a hearing on application of the good faith exception. The papers as a whole establish it for the government. The affidavit for the warrant showed sufficient information from observations for an inference that drugs were being … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: No hearing required on application of GFE; papers already show it

W.D.Pa.: GFE applies to warrantless stop based on reasonable mistake of fact

The good faith exception is here directly applied to a warrantless stop and resulting search because of a “reasonable” mistake of law. United States v. McBroom, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215219 (W.D.Pa. Nov. 8. 2021):

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: GFE applies to warrantless stop based on reasonable mistake of fact

KS: Officer did not have to rely on def’s representation AW was being withdrawn; dispatch confirmed it was still valid before arrest

There was an arrest warrant for defendant, but it was vacated by the issuing court eight hours after defendant’s arrest. Defense counsel was trying to get it vacated at the time. “Here, Rollf testified that under department policy, after dispatch … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on KS: Officer did not have to rely on def’s representation AW was being withdrawn; dispatch confirmed it was still valid before arrest

CA9: “[T]he officer’s acknowledgment that he was looking for a reason to stop Ordaz does not contradict or otherwise undermine his testimony that he found one.”

“[T]he officer’s acknowledgment that he was looking for a reason to stop Ordaz does not contradict or otherwise undermine his testimony that he found one.” United States v. Ordaz, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 32449 (6th Cir. Oct. 29, 2021). Pre-Carpenter … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Pretext | Comments Off on CA9: “[T]he officer’s acknowledgment that he was looking for a reason to stop Ordaz does not contradict or otherwise undermine his testimony that he found one.”

N.D.Ohio: Where there was no nexus and whether GFE should apply was a really close question, govt essentially gets the benefit of the doubt

“For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES Defendant Eben Anderson’s motion to suppress. With respect to Defendant Anthony Anderson, the affidavit supporting the warrant lacks probable cause justifying the search because there is no nexus between the phones and … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Good faith exception | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Where there was no nexus and whether GFE should apply was a really close question, govt essentially gets the benefit of the doubt

Army: Loaning one’s phone to another without express limitations is a waiver of REP

The military judge abused his discretion in concluding that defendant did not essentially waive all his reasonable expectation of privacy in his cell phone by loaning it to another person, including the passcode to open it. “Understandings” aren’t enough; express … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Army: Loaning one’s phone to another without express limitations is a waiver of REP

CA9: Def’s lawful possession of this vehicle gave him standing

Defendant showed standing in the vehicle searched under Byrd because he lawfully possessed it at the time of the search. United States v. Glarner, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 31706 (9th Cir. Oct. 21, 2021). The affidavit for the search warrant … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on CA9: Def’s lawful possession of this vehicle gave him standing

S.D.Tex.: Particularity and GFE are lacking; hearing set on motion to suppress

Neither the affidavit nor search warrant apparently sufficiently limit the search. The court has difficulty applying the good faith exception without a hearing on the motion to suppress. United States v. Mokbel, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191789 (S.D.Tex. Oct. 5, … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Particularity and GFE are lacking; hearing set on motion to suppress

M.D.Pa.: Exigency permitted warrantless CSLI pings

Only the owner of a cell phone has standing to challenge tracking the phone with a Stingray. Warrantless pings to locate the phone were shown by the government to be based on exigent circumstances. United States v. Baker, 2021 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Exigency permitted warrantless CSLI pings

NE: Time limited call and CSLI records were particular

The misstatements in the affidavit for the warrant here was negligence at worst, and that bars suppression. The affidavit for the warrant for defendant’s phone provided at least a “modicum” of information supporting probable cause. So, even assuming a lack … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on NE: Time limited call and CSLI records were particular

FL2: Failure to corroborate or support CI’s story defeats GFE

The complete failure to corroborate the CI’s story was thus a complete lack of probable cause, and the good faith exception did not apply. Chery v. State, 2021 Fla. App. LEXIS 13111 (Fla. 2DCA Sept. 17, 2021):

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on FL2: Failure to corroborate or support CI’s story defeats GFE

CA5: Even a mistaken critical fact to nexus can still be reasonable for GFE

An asserted fact in the search warrant affidavit that was critical to the target of the search and thus the place to be searched proved to be wrong, which the officer revealed when he learned. Still, the search warrant was … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Good faith exception, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA5: Even a mistaken critical fact to nexus can still be reasonable for GFE

NJ: Officer’s randomly looking up LPNs was not unreasonable

The officer’s randomly looking up LPNs for validity was not an unreasonable search. Defendant’s refusal to answer questions at that point only made it all worse because there was a basis for the stop and questioning. State v. Boston, 2021 … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on NJ: Officer’s randomly looking up LPNs was not unreasonable

CA9: Dismissal of indictment for 4A extremely rare remedy; here, district court suppressed

Dismissal of the indictment for violations of the Fourth Amendment are strongly disfavored. Here, the district court suppressed the search, and the government dismissed counts. That’s remedy enough. United States v. Cano, 19-50240 (9th Cir. Aug. 31, 2021). Where the … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on CA9: Dismissal of indictment for 4A extremely rare remedy; here, district court suppressed

OH10: GFE does not apply to warrantless searches

The good faith exception does not apply to warrantless searches. State v. Peeks, 2021-Ohio-3045 (10th Dist. Sept. 2, 2021). The trial court erred in finding the affidavit for search warrant to be bare bones and not entitled to the good … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on OH10: GFE does not apply to warrantless searches

CA11: RS included talking on phone during stop when repeatedly told to hang up

Defendant’s excessive nervousness, denial that some of the contents of the car were even his, and repeatedly talking on the phone with someone the officer suspected was coaching him what to do and say even after being repeatedly told to … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: RS included talking on phone during stop when repeatedly told to hang up

CA7: Consulting ADA about SW affidavit shows GF where PC question somewhat close

“An objectively reasonable officer, having consulted with the State’s Attorney in the preparation of the complaint and affidavit accompanying the application for the warrant, could have relied in good faith on the search warrant that he obtained from a judge. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Consulting ADA about SW affidavit shows GF where PC question somewhat close

CA8: 38 seconds of additional questions of passenger while ticket being written didn’t unreasonably extend stop

The second officer on the scene did not materially extend the stop by 38 seconds of additional questioning of the passenger while the first officer was writing a ticket. United States v. Salkil, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 25511 (8th Cir. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: 38 seconds of additional questions of passenger while ticket being written didn’t unreasonably extend stop