WaPo: DEA, IRS reviewed cache of emails amid ongoing criminal probe into Baltimore lawyers

WaPo: DEA, IRS reviewed cache of emails amid ongoing criminal probe into Baltimore lawyers by Tim Prudente:
Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Privileges | Comments Off on WaPo: DEA, IRS reviewed cache of emails amid ongoing criminal probe into Baltimore lawyers

WaPo: California could become the largest state to ban facial recognition in body cameras

WaPo: California could become the largest state to ban facial recognition in body cameras by Reis Thebault:
Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: California could become the largest state to ban facial recognition in body cameras

TX remands blood draw from unconscious motorist under Mitchell v. Wisconsin

“Appellee was charged with felony driving while intoxicated after the State took a blood sample from him without a warrant and while he was unconscious. The trial court granted his motion to suppress his blood test results, and the court of appeals affirmed. The State sought discretionary review to determine whether (1) implied consent to a blood draw from an unconscious driver is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, and (2) exigent circumstances justified the warrantless blood draw. We granted review of the first ground, and we hold that implied consent is not a valid basis for a blood draw in the circumstances presented here. We now grant review of the second ground concerning exigent circumstances, vacate the lower court’s holding on that issue, and remand the case to the court of appeals for reconsideration of it in light of Mitchell v. Wisconsin, 139 S.Ct. 2525, 204 L. Ed. 2d 1040 (2019).” State v. Ruiz, 2019 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 856 (Sept. 11, 2019).

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on TX remands blood draw from unconscious motorist under Mitchell v. Wisconsin

IL: Mere presence in a high crime area isn’t RS; action required, too

Mere presence in a Chicago high crime neighborhood is not reasonable suspicion. Otherwise, every resident of the neighborhood would be stopped. It requires some suspicious action as well. People v. Salgado, 2019 IL App (1st) 171377, 2019 Ill. App. LEXIS 742 (Sept. 9, 2019):
Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Mere presence in a high crime area isn’t RS; action required, too

The Federalist: DOJ Lawsuit Demands Names Of All People Who Use This App For Their Gun

The Federalist: DOJ Lawsuit Demands Names Of All People Who Use This App For Their Gun by Kyle Sammin:
Continue reading →

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on The Federalist: DOJ Lawsuit Demands Names Of All People Who Use This App For Their Gun

CA7: Former police officer stated 4A malicious prosecution claim for false and misleading information in arrest and SW

Plaintiff stated a Fourth Amendment (not called malicious prosecution) for false statements and omissions in support of his arrest and search warrant where the alleged probable cause was thin to begin with. He was tried three times, reversed twice, and acquitted on the third trial. The police exaggerated the alleged forensic evidence from unqualified people. Camm v. Faith, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 27252 (7th Cir. Sept. 10, 2019):
Continue reading →

Posted in Police misconduct | Comments Off on CA7: Former police officer stated 4A malicious prosecution claim for false and misleading information in arrest and SW

Courthouse News Service: Fourth Circuit Takes Up Secretive Raid on Law Firm

Courthouse News Service: Fourth Circuit Takes Up Secretive Raid on Law Firm by Brad Kutner:
Continue reading →

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on Courthouse News Service: Fourth Circuit Takes Up Secretive Raid on Law Firm

D.Nev.: Criminal history didn’t justify extending stop

Officers exceeded the bounds of the traffic stop because they heard defendant’s criminal history and then ordered him out of the car to seek consent to search without any reasonable suspicion. United States v. Coleman, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152832 (D. Nev. Sept. 9, 2019).

Officers had probable cause for defendant’s arrest on a warrant because he resembled the person sought. His efforts to flee the arrest amounted to a crime, and he wasn’t privileged to ignore the officers and attempt to run them down. Miller v. State, 2019 Ga. App. LEXIS 492 (Sept. 9, 2019).*

Defendant’s objection to the R&R’s finding of probable cause wasn’t specific at all, but his own confession and other evidence justified the search warrant for his email account and Facebook to look for evidence of his earlier possession of a firearm. United States v. Bear, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152783 (D. S.D. Sept. 9, 2019).*

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Criminal history didn’t justify extending stop

W.D.Ky.: PC for search and arrest may be the same

The probable cause for the search of defendant’s car also provided probable cause for his arrest. United States v. Bell, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154275 (W.D. Ky. Aug. 2, 2019).*

Defendant consented to a limited search of his computer and that led to probable cause for a search warrant. United States v. Holt, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 27076 (10th Cir. Sept. 9, 2019).*
https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/18/18-9591.pdf

The officer had reasonable suspicion from the time of the night of the stop, defendant’s excessive nervousness, the smell of marijuana, and other things. United States v. Smith, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152555 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 9, 2019).*

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: PC for search and arrest may be the same

Vice: These Cops Are Seizing Cash from People Who Smell Like Weed Before They Fly to California

Vice: These Cops Are Seizing Cash from People Who Smell Like Weed Before They Fly to California (“Smelling like cannabis and buying your ticket right before your flight from this Florida airport are apparently great reasons for cops to take your stuff.”)

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on Vice: These Cops Are Seizing Cash from People Who Smell Like Weed Before They Fly to California

WaPo: A man live-streamed his traffic stop. He recorded police fatally shooting him.

WaPo: A man live-streamed his traffic stop. He recorded police fatally shooting him. By Katie Mettler (“It remains unclear what prompted police to use lethal force.”)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on WaPo: A man live-streamed his traffic stop. He recorded police fatally shooting him.

Reason: The Supreme Court’s Next Big Fourth Amendment Case

Reason: The Supreme Court’s Next Big Fourth Amendment Case by Damon Root (“What’s at stake in Kansas v. Glover.”).

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on Reason: The Supreme Court’s Next Big Fourth Amendment Case

MD: Traffic enforcement saturation for seat belt stops wasn’t a checkpoint

A traffic enforcement saturation to stop people only without seat belts on was founded on reasonable suspicion and wasn’t a checkpoint. Johnson v. State, 2019 Md. App. LEXIS 783 (Sept. 9, 2019).*

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, and he had no insurance and warrants came up. After issuing the citation, the officer said he smelled marijuana, and defendant refused to consent to a search and the officer said he didn’t need it. The stop was valid, as was everything that happened thereafter. State v. ColeState v. ColeState v. Cole, 2019 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 556 (Sept. 9, 2019).*

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MD: Traffic enforcement saturation for seat belt stops wasn’t a checkpoint

OH2: Officer’s sexual assault of motorist criminally violated 4A

Defendant was a part time police officer conviction of state civil rights violations for sexual assault during frisks of women that clearly exceeded the Fourth Amendment. State v. Sanderson, 2019-Ohio-3589, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 3673 (2d Dist. Sept. 6, 2019).*

CBP had reasonable suspicion for an immigration stop at a Walmart parking lot because they observed surreptitiously switching cars without going into the store. While extreme nervousness when talking to the police isn’t indicative of much, extreme nervousness when one doesn’t know he or she is under observation is an indicator of reasonable suspicion. United States v. Santibanez, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151692 (W.D. Tex. Sept. 6, 2019).*

The court finds reasonable suspicion for continuation of the stop from the fact that most of the occupants of the vehicle wouldn’t look at the officer, one wouldn’t look away from a cell phone, and the vehicle “slow rolled” from a safe spot to a darker area. The officer attempted to pull him over in a well lighted area. United States v. Miller, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153254 (N.D. W.Va. Sept. 4, 2019),* adopted in part, 019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153005 (N.D. W.Va. Sept. 9, 2019).*

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OH2: Officer’s sexual assault of motorist criminally violated 4A

N.D.Ala.: Officer doesn’t have to tell a motorist he smells MJ in the car

The officer recognized defendant as having an arrest warrant on him. When the stop occurred, the officer smelled marijuana and that justified a search of the car. The fact the officer didn’t mention to defendant that he smelled marijuana isn’t determinative. “Det. Stewart’s failure to inform Cobb or anyone else that he smelled marijuana prior to performing the search does not undermine his credibility.” United States v. Cobb, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152143 (N.D. Ala. Aug. 19, 2019).

Defendant had a minor traffic violation, and that justified the stop. The court credits the rest of the officer’s testimony that there was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Stewart, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152279 (D. Minn. July 15, 2019).*

The stop was valid under one of two Kansas statutes. Defendant’s challenge to one basis doesn’t answer the other. United States v. Rios-Hernandez, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152014 (D. Kan. Sept. 6, 2019).*

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: Officer doesn’t have to tell a motorist he smells MJ in the car

E.D.Mo.: Older information in SW application substantiated by CI information from day before; not stale

Parts of the information were old, but the search warrant was not stale because a critical part of the affidavit showed that there was credible reason to believe drugs would be found there because of the CI’s observation the day before. United States v. Guthrie, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153062 (E.D. Mo. Sept. 9, 2019).*

The totality of circumstances provided reasonable suspicion to stop defendant’s car. First, the windows were obviously overtinted, which was evident from photographs. Second, there were repeated apparent hand to hand drug sales from a particular house where the same person came out to cars for a minute and then went back inside, and defendant participated in one. United States v. Maclin, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153012 (E.D. Wis. Sept. 9, 2019).*

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress when there was nothing from the search used in the trial or a “motion to substantiate,” whatever that is. Crawford v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152956 (M.D. N.C. Sept. 9, 2019).*

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Older information in SW application substantiated by CI information from day before; not stale

D.Me.: No withdrawal of plea for alleged 4A IAC where search was valid

Defendant doesn’t get to withdraw his plea to claim ineffective assistance of counsel to his search under a supervised release condition. The search appears lawful. United States v. Goguen, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152148 (D. Me. Sept. 6, 2019):*
Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Me.: No withdrawal of plea for alleged 4A IAC where search was valid

C.D.Cal.: Evidence at trial came from a prior unrelated search; the parties should stipulate that it happened to avoid unnecessary confusion

This is on the government’s motion in limine concerning how evidence at trial should come in. The government had a search warrant for theft, and that was the way into his house. To avoid problematic questions, the court suggests a stipulation that avoids reference to the alleged theft because it’s not relevant, and the parties just stipulate that the search was lawful and leave it at that. States v. Andujo, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150713 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 5, 2019).

Defendant’s motion to reconsider is denied as untimely and on the merits. It rehashes what’s already been said and offers none of the reasons given under Local Rule 6.3 for it. “Defendant does not point to any clear error in law, change in controlling law, or newly discovered facts, and thus has provided no basis for this Court to reconsider its prior decisions ….” United States v. Okparaeke, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152347 (S.D. N.Y. Sept. 6, 2019).*

Posted in Burden of pleading | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Evidence at trial came from a prior unrelated search; the parties should stipulate that it happened to avoid unnecessary confusion

OH8: Misstating the owner of a cell phone in warrant application was not material when it was seized as part of a burglary conspiracy

A burglar alarm in an industrial area at 1 am brought the police who saw men scattering, and one vehicle leaving. There was reasonable suspicion for stopping the vehicle. The search warrant for a cell phone was proper because it was based on probable cause although it misstated which of the conspirators owned it. That also was negligence at worst and doesn’t justify suppression. State v. Newton, 2019-Ohio-3566, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 3651 (8th Dist. Sept. 5, 2019).*

Defendant doesn’t have standing to challenge the search of another person’s car from which cash in the conspiracy was seized. United States v. Ugarte, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150656 (W.D. Tex. Sept. 4, 2019).*

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on OH8: Misstating the owner of a cell phone in warrant application was not material when it was seized as part of a burglary conspiracy

IL: Disorderly conduct can justify a Terry stop

Police received a 911 call about a man with a blue hoodie on a bicycle shouting profanities. Because the call was to 911 and recorded and logged with caller ID, it was more reliable. On seeing the man, the officer attempted a stop, but defendant eluded him until finally stopping. The officer was entitled to make a Terry stop for disorderly conduct. People v. Eyler, 2019 IL App (4th) 170064, 2019 Ill. App. LEXIS 737 (Sept. 6, 2019).

Police responded to a call about an imminent fight where guns were present. Ultimately, plaintiff’s decedent was shot and killed. “Each of the three relevant factors weigh heavily in favor of the conclusion Tanner’s ‘split-second judgment[]’ to use deadly force in a situation that was “tense, uncertain, and rapidly evolving’ was reasonable. Plumhoff, 572 U.S. at 775. Accordingly, the district court correctly ruled that Tanner did not violate Crittenden’s Fourth Amendment right to be free from excessive force.” Crittenden v. City of Tahlequah, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 26919 (10th Cir. Sept. 6, 2019).*

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IL: Disorderly conduct can justify a Terry stop