Daily Archives: September 9, 2024

LATimes: She endured a traumatic cavity search when visiting a California prison. Now she won a $5.6-million settlement

LATimes: She endured a traumatic cavity search when visiting a California prison. Now she won a $5.6-million settlement by Terry Castleman (“When Christina Cardenas visited her husband in 2019 at the California Correctional Institution in Tehachapi, she was forced to … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on LATimes: She endured a traumatic cavity search when visiting a California prison. Now she won a $5.6-million settlement

AP: Ex-officer’s lies led to couple’s death in Houston drug raid, prosecutor tells jurors

AP: Ex-officer’s lies led to couple’s death in Houston drug raid, prosecutor tells jurors by Juan A. Lozano (“A former Houston police officer is responsible for the 2019 deaths of a couple during a raid of their home because his … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on AP: Ex-officer’s lies led to couple’s death in Houston drug raid, prosecutor tells jurors

TN: Cell phone recently calling deceased and it being at scene of murder was nexus

The state showed nexus to defendant’s iPhone and the crime by known recent calls between the co-conspirators and the victim and the phone being at the scene of the crime. State v. Young, 2024 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 397 (Sep. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on TN: Cell phone recently calling deceased and it being at scene of murder was nexus

W.D.Pa.: Losing suppression motion then pleading nolo was collateral estoppel in later civil case

Plaintiff raised a search issue in her underlying criminal case and lost. Later, she pled nolo and thus could not appeal. That’s final enough for collateral estoppel to apply in her § 1983 case. Harr v. Washington Area Humane Soc’y, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Losing suppression motion then pleading nolo was collateral estoppel in later civil case

MA: Investigative equal protection claim can be enforced by DA’s discovery failure

Defendant raised an equal protection claim about discovery of ShapChat search warrants. Defense counsel stated that an informal survey of defense lawyers handling about 1/4th of the cases in Suffolk County showed that 85% of the warrants were against black … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MA: Investigative equal protection claim can be enforced by DA’s discovery failure