Daily Archives: July 17, 2024

OH4: Waiting for backup was prudent for delaying dog sniff even though there was no RS

With a late night stop of a person that had a drug history and the officer was outnumbered, it was prudent to call for backup before the dog sniff, and the total elapsed time wasn’t that much. The court of … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH4: Waiting for backup was prudent for delaying dog sniff even though there was no RS

CA3: No per se irreparable injury from 4A violation

The Third Circuit does not find per se irreparable injury from a Fourth Amendment violation, recognizing a conflict in the circuits. Del. State Sportsmen’s Ass’n v. Del. Dep’t of Safety & Homeland Sec., 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 17214 (3d Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA3: No per se irreparable injury from 4A violation

WA: Using software to search a cell phone doesn’t violate particularity

Use of software to search a cell phone did not violate the particularity of the warrant. The Fourth Amendment and the state constitution are intended to prevent a general rummaging, and the use of software facilitates people not looking at … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Informant hearsay, Particularity | Comments Off on WA: Using software to search a cell phone doesn’t violate particularity

UT: Def satisfied “shocking the conscience” standard for recording a telephone call while under a protective order and he couldn’t fully respond

The court finds officers baiting defendant into a recorded phone call where he was under a protective order and could not adequately respond “shocked the conscience” and would be suppressed. State v. Lewis, 2024 UT App 96, 2024 Utah App. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, State constitution | Comments Off on UT: Def satisfied “shocking the conscience” standard for recording a telephone call while under a protective order and he couldn’t fully respond

D.Md.: Asking a person to be frisked what’s on him can’t be used to justify the frisk

Asking a person about whether he has anything on him about sharp objects is reasonable and related to the frisk. Any admission cannot, however, be used to justify the frisk. United States v. Freeman, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123297 (D. … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.Md.: Asking a person to be frisked what’s on him can’t be used to justify the frisk

M.D.La.: Strip searches in investigative stops is enjoined

The Baton Rouge PD’s strip search policy of detainees in an investigative stop on less than probable cause is enjoined. “[T]he Court finds that, for any search beyond a frisk or pat-down of a citizen stopped pursuant to an investigatory … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Issue preclusion, Strip search | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Strip searches in investigative stops is enjoined