Daily Archives: July 12, 2024

S.D.Ohio: Def was entitled to discovery of body camera footage of how a search was conducted

Defendant was entitled to discovery of body camera footage of how a search was conducted. United States v. Moore, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119486 (S.D. Ohio July 2, 2024). The fact a Sixth Circuit judge dissented on a similar issue … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Discovery, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Def was entitled to discovery of body camera footage of how a search was conducted

N.D.Iowa: Dog sniff at apt door from common hallway was reasonable even if hallway was locked to outsiders

A dog sniff at an apartment door from a common hallway was reasonable, even if the hallway also had a locked door. “Following the reasoning in Penaloza-Romero and Peck, and applying the Dunn factors, I find that the area around … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Dog sniff at apt door from common hallway was reasonable even if hallway was locked to outsiders

CA2: Failure to object at sentencing to a suspicionless search condition was waiver

Failure to object at sentencing to a suspicionless search condition was waiver. United States v. Nash, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 16547 (2d Cir. July 8, 2024). Defendant had a hearing on a motion to suppress that went undecided when he … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Waiver | Comments Off on CA2: Failure to object at sentencing to a suspicionless search condition was waiver

KS: Extending stop on a hunch lacked RS

“LaGuardia argues that Officer Opperman lacked reasonable suspicion to extend the stop from a crash report to a DUI investigation. He claims that the officer investigated LaGuardia for DUI only because he abandoned his vehicle after the accident in snowy … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KS: Extending stop on a hunch lacked RS

D.Kan.: Driving another person’s car some other times doesn’t give standing

Merely driving another person’s car some doesn’t give standing. “Defendant (like the defendants in Rakas) has neither a property nor possessory interest in the vehicle and thus lacks standing to challenge the search of it. He did not have a … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Standing | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Driving another person’s car some other times doesn’t give standing