UT: Def satisfied “shocking the conscience” standard for recording a telephone call while under a protective order and he couldn’t fully respond

The court finds officers baiting defendant into a recorded phone call where he was under a protective order and could not adequately respond “shocked the conscience” and would be suppressed. State v. Lewis, 2024 UT App 96, 2024 Utah App. LEXIS 99 (July 11, 2024).

The officer’s tackling plaintiff on a highway overpass was with qualified immunity because plaintiff was resisting and there was a danger of traffic and falling off the bridge. Johnson v. City of Atlanta, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 17161 (11th Cir. July 12, 2024).*

Petitioner’s claim that the search warrant for his property was defective under the state Racial Justice Act fails for no allegations. Washington v. Superior Court, 2024 Cal. LEXIS 3600 (July 10, 2024).*

The officer’s approximation of the weight of drugs isn’t necessarily false or even material for Franks. United States v. Gist-Holden, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 17178 (7th Cir. July 11, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, State constitution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.