Daily Archives: September 22, 2019

N.D.Okla.: Impoundment and inventory was non-pretextual and reasonable

The impoundment and inventory of defendant’s rented car was reasonable under all the circumstances at the time it happened, and it was factually justified and not pretextual. It would have been left in a high crime area on private property, … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Impoundment and inventory was non-pretextual and reasonable

Cal.1: An electronic device probation search condition is reasonable to aid rehabilitation; but here it needs to be narrower

An electronic search condition for this juvenile involved in car burglaries was reasonable in its inception, but it had to be narrowed. The court finds an electronic search condition reasonable because of the inordinate amount of time he spends on … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.1: An electronic device probation search condition is reasonable to aid rehabilitation; but here it needs to be narrower

D.Neb.: Advance notice def driving into state doesn’t require SW for car under automobile exception

Defendant concedes officers had probable cause. Just because they had advance notice defendant was coming because of the breadth of their investigation, the automobile exception allowed a vehicle search because of the mobility of the car. Advance notice still doesn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Advance notice def driving into state doesn’t require SW for car under automobile exception

N.D.Ga.: Hearsay is admissible in suppression hearings under Rule 104(a)

Hearsay is specifically admissible in suppression hearings [and issuing search warrants] under Rule 104(a). [After all, that’s how informant hearsay and collective knowledge work.] The court credits one officer as to what another told him in the probable cause for … Continue reading

Posted in Suppression hearings, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Hearsay is admissible in suppression hearings under Rule 104(a)

CA9: IRS agent’s need to watch ptf pee during SW was unreasonable; they didn’t do that to her husband when he did

Plaintiff’s claim that an IRS CID investigator had to watch her go to the bathroom just in case she was hiding evidence survived a qualified immunity challenge. The right to bodily privacy was established at the time, and the officer’s … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: IRS agent’s need to watch ptf pee during SW was unreasonable; they didn’t do that to her husband when he did

FL5: Car search was justified by search incident; automobile exception finding not even appealed

Defendant’s traffic stop was justified for stopping in the crosswalk before turning on red. The search of the car was found by the trial court with probable cause and justified by the search incident doctrine and the automobile exception. Defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Search incident, Standards of review | Comments Off on FL5: Car search was justified by search incident; automobile exception finding not even appealed

OH6: Search claim can’t be raised on post-conviction, but def would lose on merits anyway

Defendant in post-conviction raises seizure of a Western Union document from Kroger. First, that’s defaulted. Second, it’s admissible through the third-party doctrine. State v. Young, 2019-Ohio-3819, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 3873 (6th Dist. Sept. 20, 2019).* Defendant’s guilty plea waives … Continue reading

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on OH6: Search claim can’t be raised on post-conviction, but def would lose on merits anyway

CA6: Seizing ptf out of her home for a psych eval without PC stated claim and overcame QI

Plaintiff stated a claim that she was unreasonably seized in her home without probable cause or a warrant for a psych evaluation. Qualified immunity denied. Rudolph v. Atkinson, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 28477 (6th Cir. Sept. 20, 2019)*:

Posted in Community caretaking function, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Seizing ptf out of her home for a psych eval without PC stated claim and overcame QI

CA2: US citizen jailed without PC as an undocumented immigrant states a FTCA claim

A federal tort claims act case was properly stated for an American citizen plaintiff’s four day detention in an immigration facility as lacking probable cause. Hernandez v. United States, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 28081 (2d Cir. Sept. 17, 2019). Defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Immigration arrests, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA2: US citizen jailed without PC as an undocumented immigrant states a FTCA claim

D.Minn.: A car hauler has actual and apparent authority to consent to a car in his possession for transport

The car that was searched was being hauled by a car carrier. By turning over a car to a car hauler, the car hauler has complete possession and actual and apparent authority to consent to a search, and the person … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on D.Minn.: A car hauler has actual and apparent authority to consent to a car in his possession for transport

W.D.Ky.: Questions about def having a firearm were unrelated to the basis of the stop; suppression granted

Defendant’s stop was pretextual, but it was with an objective basis. He was leaving a funeral at night with overtinted windows, and the officer couldn’t see inside. He was repeatedly asked about firearms in the car, something unrelated to the … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Questions about def having a firearm were unrelated to the basis of the stop; suppression granted