Monthly Archives: October 2018

D.Haw.: “Intended recipient” of a parcel whose name isn’t on it has no standing.

As an “intended recipient” of a parcel, defendant has no standing. His name isn’t on the package as sender or recipient. United States v. Williams, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177669 (D. Haw. Oct. 16, 2018). Officers could reasonably believe that … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Mail and packages, Standing | Comments Off on D.Haw.: “Intended recipient” of a parcel whose name isn’t on it has no standing.

CA6: Officer spent 90 minutes at plaintiff’s house on the curtilage trying to get him to come out for a probation breath test; that violated 4A but officer gets QI

Plaintiff is a probationer who had a police officer show at his house to get a breath sample per his probation conditions. Despite repeated knocking and use of the police car’s PA system, plaintiff didn’t come to the door and … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Officer spent 90 minutes at plaintiff’s house on the curtilage trying to get him to come out for a probation breath test; that violated 4A but officer gets QI

AL: Def waived REP in cell phone by leaving it at crime scene

Defendant waived any reasonable expectation of privacy in his cell phone by leaving it at the crime scene. Tolbert v. State, 2018 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 65 (Oct. 15, 2018). The child pornography affidavit for search warrant wasn’t a “model … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Probable cause | Comments Off on AL: Def waived REP in cell phone by leaving it at crime scene

CO: Unauthorized taking of juvenile’s DNA requires suppression

Unauthorized collection of DNA from a juvenile offender is subject to suppression and it should be purged from CODIS. Casillas v. People, 2018 CO 78M, 2018 Colo. LEXIS 832 (Oct. 15, 2018). A routine traffic stop outside of a municipal … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, DNA | Comments Off on CO: Unauthorized taking of juvenile’s DNA requires suppression

VA: CSLI obtained before Carpenter was valid

CSLI obtained in 2012 and 2015 was lawful at the time before Carpenter, so the good faith exception applies. (The case was GVR’d because of Carpenter.) “We adopt the analytical framework set forth in Chavez. Appellant’s CSLI was acquired in … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on VA: CSLI obtained before Carpenter was valid

CA5: Unconditional guilty plea waives 4A claims

Even after Class v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 798 (2018), an unconditional guilty plea waives search and seizure claims. “So under Class, Torres may not raise a Fourth Amendment challenge on appeal, given his voluntary unconditional guilty plea. See … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CA5: Unconditional guilty plea waives 4A claims

CA6: Police cannot summarily kill dogs in houses they search

From 1919-2014, it violated Michigan law to have an unlicensed dog over six months old, and state law and city ordinance permitted officials to kill them. In 2014, that changed. Plaintiffs became squatters in an abandoned house in Detroit, and … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: Police cannot summarily kill dogs in houses they search

CA11: Work-related injuries don’t necessarily translate into OSHA violations; records request quashed as overbroad

Existence of work-related injuries or illnesses do not translate directly into reasonable suspicion that an OSHA violation occurred. The district court was correct in quashing the inspection warrant for lack of a proper showing, without prejudice to OSHA establishing the … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on CA11: Work-related injuries don’t necessarily translate into OSHA violations; records request quashed as overbroad

NYTimes: How an Unlikely Family History Website Transformed Cold Case Investigations

NYTimes: How an Unlikely Family History Website Transformed Cold Case Investigations by Heather Murphy: Fifteen murder and sexual assault cases have been solved since April with a single genealogy website. This is how GEDmatch went from a casual side project … Continue reading

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on NYTimes: How an Unlikely Family History Website Transformed Cold Case Investigations

WaPo: Opinion: Little Rock’s dangerous and illegal drug war

WaPo: Opinion: Little Rock’s dangerous and illegal drug war by Radley Balko (with security video of the raid) (and this is a product of Hudson v. Michigan, which we can thank SCOTUS for):

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on WaPo: Opinion: Little Rock’s dangerous and illegal drug war

OH2: Motion for return of property after a forfeiture order is final is moot

A motion for return of property after a forfeiture order is final is moot. State v. Housley, 2018-Ohio-4140, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 4467 (2d Dist. Oct. 12, 2018). There was no Franks violation. Officers got permission from a child to … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on OH2: Motion for return of property after a forfeiture order is final is moot

DE: Officer’s training and experience in intoxicated drivers was relevant and significant to the PC showing

The officer’s training and experience in intoxicated drivers was relevant and significant to the probable cause showing in the affidavit for defendant’s BAC. He was not a mere layperson making an observation as defendant says. State v. Law, 2018 Del. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause | Comments Off on DE: Officer’s training and experience in intoxicated drivers was relevant and significant to the PC showing

DE: Motion deadlines are there for a reason; the defense doesn’t show “exceptional circumstances” to overcome the deadline

There are motion deadlines for a reason. Former defense counsel reviewed the file and didn’t see a basis for a motion to suppress. Another defense lawyer came in and did. The excuse for getting around the deadline is late disclosure … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on DE: Motion deadlines are there for a reason; the defense doesn’t show “exceptional circumstances” to overcome the deadline

CA8: Def abandoned a rental car he didn’t rent and didn’t have keys to on another’s back property

Defendant drove a rental car rented by another and parked it in someone’s backyard he didn’t know. He knocked on the door, got no answer, and left the car there. The owner, however, was there and didn’t answer the door. … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment | Comments Off on CA8: Def abandoned a rental car he didn’t rent and didn’t have keys to on another’s back property

D.Kan.: Driver had no standing in car search even though owner was with him in car

A mere possessor/driver of a car has no standing in it, even allegedly with permission of the owner who was sitting in the car with him [and this certainly seems completely contrary to Bryd]. United States v. Gonzalez-Molina, 2018 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Driver had no standing in car search even though owner was with him in car

N.D.Ga.: Court assumes exclusionary rule applies to 404(b) evidence and finds 2003 search valid for trial in 2018; frisk of fannypack valid

Defendant moved to suppress 404(b) evidence of a 2003 stop and search that the government will offer into evidence in his current indictment involving allegations from 2014 going to trial shortly. The stop was on video, and the officer’s testimony … Continue reading

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Court assumes exclusionary rule applies to 404(b) evidence and finds 2003 search valid for trial in 2018; frisk of fannypack valid

E.D.Ky.: Searching def’s underwear for drugs at 1:24 am on a virtually empty street that nobody likely saw was not unreasonable

The officer’s search of defendant’s underwear for drugs at 1:24 am on a dark night and nearly empty street was not a strip search and it was reasonably conducted. Nobody else was close enough to see anything. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Searching def’s underwear for drugs at 1:24 am on a virtually empty street that nobody likely saw was not unreasonable

E.D.Wis.: SW in tax fraud case wasn’t stale despite some information being years old

Defendants were indicted in a tax fraud scheme, and some of the information used to get the warrant was years old. The court finds it not stale on the totality because it is a records case and it is common … Continue reading

Posted in Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: SW in tax fraud case wasn’t stale despite some information being years old

KS: Pushing a button on a cell phone to light up screen was not a plain view; suppression affirmed

Defendant was involved in a fatal car accident, and the officer at the scene allegedly saw the screen of the cell phone in plain view showing texting at the time of the accident. While two U.S. District Court cases support … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on KS: Pushing a button on a cell phone to light up screen was not a plain view; suppression affirmed

TN: Def wasn’t seized when officer parked next to him to talk, but he was when he tried to leave and was told to stop; all reasonable

Stopping next to defendant’s car to talk to him wasn’t a seizure. When defendant moved and attempted to leave, the officer told him to stop, and that was a seizure. The encounter was based on an anonymous caller’s information, and … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on TN: Def wasn’t seized when officer parked next to him to talk, but he was when he tried to leave and was told to stop; all reasonable