Monthly Archives: May 2018

S.D.Fla.: Consent to giving up passwords at border irrelevant since CBP can search anyway

In a border search case, defendant’s consent to produce his passwords doesn’t matter because the government has the authority to conduct a search of incoming electronic equipment. United States v. Vallerius, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85620 (S.D. Fla. May 1, … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Consent to giving up passwords at border irrelevant since CBP can search anyway

OK: Even if protective sweep was pretextual, the case parallels McArthur and there was PC for warrant without it

The trial court held that the protective sweep here was pretextual and suppressed. The court of criminal appeals held that this case was strikingly similar to Illinois v. McArthur. There was valid third party consent to the entry. The information … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Independent source | Comments Off on OK: Even if protective sweep was pretextual, the case parallels McArthur and there was PC for warrant without it

AZ: Trial court didn’t make finding on Strickland IAC prejudice for failure to argue curtilage; remanded

Defense counsel deliberatedly didn’t make a claim officers violated curtilage in their initial entry to defendant’s property. The first search warrant application was rejected by one judge. The affidavit was redrafted with additional facts and presented to a second judge … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on AZ: Trial court didn’t make finding on Strickland IAC prejudice for failure to argue curtilage; remanded

UT: The fact an electronic warrant application is acted on quickly doesn’t mean reviewing court should be “skeptical” of PC finding

This case started with a cell phone stolen from a customer in a grocery store. The police pinged the phone and it came back as being located at defendant’s house. Police went there to talk to defendant, and he had … Continue reading

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on UT: The fact an electronic warrant application is acted on quickly doesn’t mean reviewing court should be “skeptical” of PC finding

Cal: Victim and witness’s public social media pages subject to subpoena by defense (with a history of the SCA)

Murder defendants sought private and public Facebook pages of the victim and state’s witnesses for their defense. The court of appeals quashed, and the court remands. The public pages shall be produced because they are public by consent. There’s a … Continue reading

Posted in Social media warrants | Comments Off on Cal: Victim and witness’s public social media pages subject to subpoena by defense (with a history of the SCA)

PA: 9 month delay between issuance of SW for content of seized cell phone and actual search wasn’t unreasonable where nothing changed

Defendant’s cell phone was seized by consent and a search warrant was obtained for it. It took nine months for the search to occur. Because nothing changed between the seizure, the warrant, and the search, the ultimate search was not … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonableness | Comments Off on PA: 9 month delay between issuance of SW for content of seized cell phone and actual search wasn’t unreasonable where nothing changed

N.D.Ohio: Merely alleging the affiant never appeared before the issuing magistrate to sign it is nothing without proof to support it

Merely alleging the affiant never appeared before the issuing magistrate to sign it is nothing without proof to support it. The warrant says the affiant did. United States v. Oliver, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85865 (N.D. Ohio May 22, 2018). … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Merely alleging the affiant never appeared before the issuing magistrate to sign it is nothing without proof to support it

The Marshall Project: Your Home is Your…Snitch?

The Marshall Project: Your Home is Your…Snitch? by Daniel Zwerdling: When your appliances work as police informants.

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on The Marshall Project: Your Home is Your…Snitch?

M.D.Fla.: No prejudice for IAC where alleged 4A violation produced nothing for trial

One of defendant’s 2255 claims involved a search of a gun safe that had nothing of evidentiary value in it. It didn’t matter at trial, was a “red herring,” and there could be no prejudice. Belitsky v. United States, 2018 … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: No prejudice for IAC where alleged 4A violation produced nothing for trial

LA5: Parole officers were stalking horses for police acting without RS

Defendant’s parole search was without reasonable suspicion. In addition, the parole officers were acting at the request of law enforcement officers acting on an unsubstantiated tip, and that’s unreasonable in this state. State v. Clay, 2018 La. App. LEXIS 1004 … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on LA5: Parole officers were stalking horses for police acting without RS

WA: Where ptf didn’t know he was being pursued, act of force to knock him from motorcycle doesn’t get qualified immunity

Where plaintiff showed he didn’t know he was being pursued by police while on his motorcycle, the officer’s act of opening his car door to knock him off his bike was a question for the jury, and the officer gets … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on WA: Where ptf didn’t know he was being pursued, act of force to knock him from motorcycle doesn’t get qualified immunity

D.Minn.: No right to being stopped at earliest time

There was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop, and it isn’t material that the officer chose to wait a few minutes before making the stop. United States v. Taariq, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85630 (D. Minn. May 22, 2018). Plaintiff inmate’s … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.Minn.: No right to being stopped at earliest time

NYTimes: Calling Your Lawyer’s Cell From Jail? What You Say Can and Will Be Used Against You.

NYTimes: Calling Your Lawyer’s Cell From Jail? What You Say Can and Will Be Used Against You. by Richard A. Oppel Jr.: Most people assume that a conversation with their lawyer will remain confidential. But if the conversation takes place … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on NYTimes: Calling Your Lawyer’s Cell From Jail? What You Say Can and Will Be Used Against You.

OR: Def adequately pled 4A and argued substance to preserve issue for appeal

Defendant preserved her Fourth Amendment claim by citing it in the motion and by arguing at the hearing the stop was impermissibly extended. “Although the question is close, we agree with defendant that her Fourth Amendment argument is adequately preserved … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: Def adequately pled 4A and argued substance to preserve issue for appeal

W.D.Wash.: Motel 6’s own policy of giving ICE & DHS its customer names doesn’t bring it within Patel

Motel 6 in Washington state was providing guest registry information to ICE and DHS, and the state sued them in state court. It was removed to federal court. The case is remanded. Because Motel 6 was providing it voluntarily, Patel … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Motel 6’s own policy of giving ICE & DHS its customer names doesn’t bring it within Patel

KOAT-Albuquerque: Border patrol agent stops two people after they spoke Spanish in Montana

KOAT-Albuquerque: Border patrol agent stops two people after they spoke Spanish in Montana by David Taube:

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on KOAT-Albuquerque: Border patrol agent stops two people after they spoke Spanish in Montana

Wired: A Location-Sharing Disaster Shows How Exposed You Really Are

Wired: A Location-Sharing Disaster Shows How Exposed You Really Are by Brian Barrett:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Wired: A Location-Sharing Disaster Shows How Exposed You Really Are

W.D.Tex.: Stop for jaywalking in high crime area didn’t provide RS to detain to ask about drugs; removing key fob from pocket was 4A violation

Reasonable suspicion for jaywalking didn’t permit questioning about drugs just because defendant was in a high crime area. The use of defendant’s key fob in his pocket violated the Fourth Amendment, following United States v. Craddock, 841 F.3d 756, 760 … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Stop for jaywalking in high crime area didn’t provide RS to detain to ask about drugs; removing key fob from pocket was 4A violation

S.D.N.Y.: Defense counsel’s affidavit of an alleged Franks violation was speculative

Defense counsel’s conclusion that a video at issue was the same one on a cell phone is speculative at best. “The Court concludes that the detective’s statement that the phone in the surveillance footage appears to be the same as … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Defense counsel’s affidavit of an alleged Franks violation was speculative

W.D.Okla.: Facebook warrant for all content not overbroad; didn’t have to limit to communications and messages

The search warrant for defendant’s Facebook was not overbroad, and it didn’t have to be limited to communications and messages. It could be for the entirety of the account for the relevant period. United States v. Varnell, 2018 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Social media warrants | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: Facebook warrant for all content not overbroad; didn’t have to limit to communications and messages