Daily Archives: April 4, 2016

WaPo: Applying the Fourth Amendment to cell-site simulators

WaPo: Applying the Fourth Amendment to cell-site simulators by Orin Kerr: The widespread use of cellphones gives the government a way to locate criminal suspects using a device known as a cell-site simulator. The Maryland Court of Special Appeals recently … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information | Comments Off on WaPo: Applying the Fourth Amendment to cell-site simulators

SCOTUS: Strickland’s deference to counsel’s decisions applies to appellate counsel [didn’t we all assume that anyway? Not CA6]

The Strickland “doubly deferential” standard of trial counsel’s failure to challenge a search issue because it would not prevail applies to appellate counsel, too. Woods v. Etherton, 15-723 (U.S. April 4, 2016):

Posted in Ineffective assistance, SCOTUS, Standards of review | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Strickland’s deference to counsel’s decisions applies to appellate counsel [didn’t we all assume that anyway? Not CA6]

CA1: Merely being primary user of computer doesn’t mean wife didn’t have apparent authority to consent; no separate password

Defendant’s wife saw child pornography on his computer and told the police. She consented to a search of the computer. Even though he was the primary user of the computer, he did not leave the computer password protected from her … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on CA1: Merely being primary user of computer doesn’t mean wife didn’t have apparent authority to consent; no separate password

OR: Motion to suppress statement does not include suppression of evidence derived from it; have to be explicit

The motion to suppress the statement here did not include a motion to suppress psychical evidence derived from it. “Here, the particular record of this case demonstrates that defendant did not raise the issue regarding the evidence in the backpack … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on OR: Motion to suppress statement does not include suppression of evidence derived from it; have to be explicit

FL5: Passenger can be detained with car; certifying conflict with FL4

“We affirm, and write to consider whether a police officer may, as a matter of course, detain a passenger who attempts to leave the scene of a lawful traffic stop without violating the passenger’s Fourth Amendment rights. … We hold … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on FL5: Passenger can be detained with car; certifying conflict with FL4

TX14: State const. affords no broader privacy in CSLI than Fourth Amendment

Defendant was an occasional guest in the house of another. Assuming he had standing, it’s clear that the owner had authority to consent and did consent to a search. Randolph doesn’t require seeking out the defendant to get consent from … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, State constitution | Comments Off on TX14: State const. affords no broader privacy in CSLI than Fourth Amendment

W.D.Pa.: Leaving car in street after being taken away by ambulance after being shot justified impoundment and inventory of the car

Defendant called the police because he was shot in the chest while in his car. An ambulance arrived and took defendant to the hospital. His car was left in the middle of the street. Impoundment of the car and inventory … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Private search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Leaving car in street after being taken away by ambulance after being shot justified impoundment and inventory of the car