Daily Archives: April 27, 2016

The Intercept: Email Privacy Bill Passes House Unanimously

The Intercept: Email Privacy Bill Passes House Unanimously by Jenna McLaughlin: The House voted unanimously, 419-0, on Wednesday to bring the law that protects the privacy of Americans’ e-mails into the 21st century. The Email Privacy Act would reform the … Continue reading

Posted in ECPA | Comments Off on The Intercept: Email Privacy Bill Passes House Unanimously

Cal.3d: When stopping a car and a second one stops, too, it was reasonable to order occupants out of second car

One vehicle was being stopped in a driveway, but another was between the police car and the target car. The officers could reasonably get the occupants out of the car in between so they could know what they were dealing … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on Cal.3d: When stopping a car and a second one stops, too, it was reasonable to order occupants out of second car

CA11: Luggage dog alerts to on interstate bus is subject to automobile exception

Defendant was apparently a regular passenger on El Expreso bus traveling from Florida to Texas and back. Intel briefings told him that heroin was being concealed in large cans of food. Defendant had a large can of food in his … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on CA11: Luggage dog alerts to on interstate bus is subject to automobile exception

W.D.Okla.: Ping order not subject to exclusionary rule under ECPA

A cell phone ping order allegedly in violation of ECPA was not subject to suppression. The warrantless entry into the house was justified by exigent circumstances. United States v. Banks, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53876 (W.D.Okla. April 22, 2016). The … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, DNA, ECPA, Good faith exception | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: Ping order not subject to exclusionary rule under ECPA

NJ: A rifle case on a felon’s porch seen in a protective sweep qualifies for plain view; its incriminating nature is immediately apparent

Defendant was arrested in his house, and a protective sweep of the porch was valid. In plain view was a rifle case, and defendant was a felon in possession. It was reasonable to seize the rifle. State v. Cope, 2016 … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep | Comments Off on NJ: A rifle case on a felon’s porch seen in a protective sweep qualifies for plain view; its incriminating nature is immediately apparent

OH3: Citizen informant reliable per se; dispatcher doesn’t need to be called at suppression hearing

“Unlike Navarette, this case presents an identified citizen informant, who, according to Weisner, is credited with greater reliability.” It also wasn’t necessary to call the police dispatcher at the suppression hearing. State v. Hancock, 2016-Ohio-2671, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 1544 … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH3: Citizen informant reliable per se; dispatcher doesn’t need to be called at suppression hearing