Daily Archives: April 24, 2016

D.Mass.: NIT warrant in CP investigation that transmitted information to user’s computers violated USMJ statute and Rule 41 and no GFE

In a child porn investigation, the government took over a server with child porn known as “Website A.” “The government used a “Network Investigative Technique (“NIT”) [warrant] that would allow the government covertly to transmit computer code to Website A … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Surveillance technology, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.Mass.: NIT warrant in CP investigation that transmitted information to user’s computers violated USMJ statute and Rule 41 and no GFE

M.D.Pa.: Checking criminal history doesn’t require probable cause

Checking criminal history doesn’t require probable cause, and defendant doesn’t cite any authority other than the Fourth and Fifth Amendment should be liberally construed. Motion in limine denied in one 711 word sentence. United States v. Green, 2016 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Checking criminal history doesn’t require probable cause

M.D.Ga.: CI’s tip had sufficient detail with sufficient corroboration to be RS

“Although Cartwright does not appear to challenge the CI’s basis of knowledge for the tip, it is a factor that is considered in the reliability analysis. … Even so, that fact, considered alongside the other substantial factors, leads to the … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Ga.: CI’s tip had sufficient detail with sufficient corroboration to be RS

WaPo: Re: Above the Law: Comments are making the internet worse. So we got rid of them.

WaPo: Re: Above the Law: Comments are making the internet worse. So we got rid of them by David Lat: So we decided to get rid of the comments section. * * * In part, our decision was based on … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on WaPo: Re: Above the Law: Comments are making the internet worse. So we got rid of them.

C.D.Ill.: Opening a flip phone to see the screen is a “search” under Hicks

Opening defendant’s flip phone to see the home screen is a search under Hicks. The phone was clearly seized under the Fourth Amendment. The government, however, showed probable cause for a search warrant for the phone, and that was independent … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Search | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Opening a flip phone to see the screen is a “search” under Hicks