Daily Archives: April 17, 2016

S.D.Cal.: A cursory search of a cell phone of a person arrested for importation of drugs was permissible under the border search exception

A cursory search of a cell phone of a person arrested for importation of drugs was permissible under the border search exception. This was no deep forensic evaluation. Defendant also showed standing in the cell phone in his possession. “Specifically, … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: A cursory search of a cell phone of a person arrested for importation of drugs was permissible under the border search exception

CA8: Entry was justified by the community caretaking function because of possibility person inside was in danger

The police entry was here was justified because of the possibility that the person inside was unable to communicate and potentially held against her will or otherwise in danger. United States v. Smith, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 6749 (8th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function | Comments Off on CA8: Entry was justified by the community caretaking function because of possibility person inside was in danger

CA11: Where the SW was drafted the day before the alleged illegal entry, the independent source doctrine clearly applied

The independent source doctrine was sufficient to show that the search was valid, no matter what. The affidavit for the search warrant was drafted the day before the alleged illegal entry for arrest and protective sweep, which the court can … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Independent source | Comments Off on CA11: Where the SW was drafted the day before the alleged illegal entry, the independent source doctrine clearly applied

D.Conn.: Def’s failure to testify at the suppression hearing doesn’t make process inadequate

“There is no evidence to suggest that the State of Connecticut did not afford the petitioner a full and fair opportunity to litigate his Fourth Amendment claims. The fact that the petitioner chose not to testify at the hearings before … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Def’s failure to testify at the suppression hearing doesn’t make process inadequate

TN: Not deficient performance for IAC where Fourth Amendment argument hadn’t yet been recognized

It was not deficient performance on the part of trial counsel to fail to argue that text messages should have been suppressed, a legal theory which, at the time, lacked statutory or precedential support. Vaughn v. State, 2016 Tenn. Crim. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Curtilage, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on TN: Not deficient performance for IAC where Fourth Amendment argument hadn’t yet been recognized