Category Archives: Scope of search

E.D.Va.: SW for Manafort’s house is upheld

(1) “In sum, the warrant here (i) identified the items to be seized in relation to specific Subject Offenses, (ii) included an illustrative list of records to limit the discretion of executing agents, and (iii) provided a sufficient description of … Continue reading →

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity, Reasonableness, Scope of search | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: SW for Manafort’s house is upheld

N.D.Cal.: Smell of MJ from passenger compartment is PC only as to that area

The smell of marijuana came from the passenger compartment, and the court finds that the probable cause that it creates is limited to the passenger compartment under the automobile exception. United States v. Chavez, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107695 (N.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Scope of search, Strip search | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Smell of MJ from passenger compartment is PC only as to that area

D.Md.: SW for drug evidence on a computer allowed cursory look at each file, and CP was validly found

Once officers were in defendant’s computer with a search warrant looking for drug evidence, they could cursorily look at each file, and, in the process found child pornography. [This is akin to a plain view.] With that, the search stopped, … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Particularity, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Md.: SW for drug evidence on a computer allowed cursory look at each file, and CP was validly found

WV: Search of def on the premises of a place searched by SW was unreasonable without a showing of his nexus; merely being there isn’t nexus

Search of defendant found on the premises of a search of another person’s property was unreasonable because there was no shown nexus to him and the crime under suspicion. Even the occupants of the property weren’t named in the search … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Scope of search | Comments Off on WV: Search of def on the premises of a place searched by SW was unreasonable without a showing of his nexus; merely being there isn’t nexus

D.Alas.: Consent to search doesn’t include destruction of property in the search

The government got consent to search a package for drugs. That consent did not include cutting a candle in half to find the drugs. Consent to search doesn’t include destruction of property. United States v. Swenton, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Alas.: Consent to search doesn’t include destruction of property in the search

M.D.Tenn.: While def’s search under “all persons” clause of SW was unreasonable, he was still subject to Terry detenion

A search of defendant under an “all persons” clause in a warrant was unreasonable. Still, however, the officers had reasonable suspicion to detain him. His admission then was that he had a gun, and that led to a frisk. “Giving … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: While def’s search under “all persons” clause of SW was unreasonable, he was still subject to Terry detenion

CA8: Parked RV was “vehicle on the premises” even though connected to water and electricity

A parked RV qualified as a “vehicle on the premises” even though it would have taken 30 minutes to make it ready to move. It had a satellite dish on the roof and it was connected to water and electricity. … Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search | Comments Off on CA8: Parked RV was “vehicle on the premises” even though connected to water and electricity

DE: “The scope of the warrant so far outruns that probable cause finding—and is so lacking in particularity relative to that probable cause finding—that it qualifies as plain error.”

A rare outcome: “The scope of the warrant so far outruns that probable cause finding—and is so lacking in particularity relative to that probable cause finding—that it qualifies as plain error.” Buckham v. State, 2018 Del. LEXIS 166 (Apr. 18, … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on DE: “The scope of the warrant so far outruns that probable cause finding—and is so lacking in particularity relative to that probable cause finding—that it qualifies as plain error.”

CA11: Financial fraud SW permits search of def’s wallet on his person

In a search warrant for financial fraud of defendant’s house, finding defendant there allowed a search of his wallet under the warrant. United States v. Shabazz, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 9774 (11th Cir. Apr. 18, 2018):

Posted in Scope of search | Comments Off on CA11: Financial fraud SW permits search of def’s wallet on his person

ABAJ: How will prosecutors handle privileged documents from Michael Cohen raids?

No, the attorney-client privilege isn’t dead, and neither is the crime fraud exception. ABAJ: How will prosecutors handle privileged documents from Michael Cohen raids? by Stephanie Francis Ward:

Posted in Privileges, Scope of search | Comments Off on ABAJ: How will prosecutors handle privileged documents from Michael Cohen raids?

D.Me.: SW didn’t authorize search of visitor’s cars arriving after search started

The search warrant in this case did not authorize a search of a vehicle that arrived at the premises during the search. There was, however, independent probable cause for a search of the vehicle under the automobile exception. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Me.: SW didn’t authorize search of visitor’s cars arriving after search started

D.Minn.: Seizure of emails implicated A-C privilege and are subject to suppression

The defendant raised attorney-client privilege against the seizure of emails to lawyers and then CPAs retained by his tax lawyers. The former was determined to be waived. The latter, however, remained privileged. United States v. Adams, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Privileges, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Seizure of emails implicated A-C privilege and are subject to suppression

AK: SW clause to “search any persons” here didn’t enable search of every person who came to the premises during the search

Defendant came to a Fairbanks house when a search warrant was being executed, and he was searched, too, under the auspices of the “search any persons” present reference in the warrant. Defendant’s search was unreasonable under the circumstances. Innocent persons … Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on AK: SW clause to “search any persons” here didn’t enable search of every person who came to the premises during the search

LA5: Scope of auto exception search is the PC that authorizes it

Defendant’s car was subject to the automobile exception because it was mobile, despite being parked and not running. “The scope of the warrantless search of an automobile is not defined by the nature of the container in which the contraband … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Scope of search | Comments Off on LA5: Scope of auto exception search is the PC that authorizes it

W.D.Pa.: SW for premises for “other evidence of distribution” of drugs permitted search of def’s pockets

The search warrant was for “drugs, drug paraphernalia, owe sheets, cell phones, firearms, stolen merchandise, or other evidence of distribution of a controlled substance.” That permits a search of defendant’s pockets, and the cash found there was subject to potential … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance, Scope of search | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: SW for premises for “other evidence of distribution” of drugs permitted search of def’s pockets

New Republic: Should Cops Be Allowed to Rip Up Your Stuff While Looking for Drugs?

New Republic: Should Cops Be Allowed to Rip Up Your Stuff While Looking for Drugs? by Matt Ford: How the Supreme Court can curtail the destruction of private property during police searches

Posted in Scope of search | Comments Off on New Republic: Should Cops Be Allowed to Rip Up Your Stuff While Looking for Drugs?

MA: Consent to search for firearms and drugs “in the vehicle” wasn’t notice that the officer would search under the hood; no consent for that search

The trial court properly granted defendant’s motion to suppress because his consent to a search for drugs or firearms “in the vehicle” did not authorize an officer to search under the vehicle’s hood and to remove the air filter, since … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Scope of search | Comments Off on MA: Consent to search for firearms and drugs “in the vehicle” wasn’t notice that the officer would search under the hood; no consent for that search

AR: Search of def’s wallet in a frisk was unreasonable

The officer made a drug arrest in the park, and defendant was around and fidgeting with his hands repeatedly going in and out of his pockets. A frisk of defendant for a weapon was reasonable, but a search of his … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Scope of search, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on AR: Search of def’s wallet in a frisk was unreasonable

CA4 doesn’t have to decide circuit conflict of whether smell of MJ justifies search of trunk

The smell of marijuana in the passenger compartment and more about the stop and place of stop provided probable cause for search of the entire car, including the trunk. The court notes a circuit split of whether smell in the … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA4 doesn’t have to decide circuit conflict of whether smell of MJ justifies search of trunk

D.Minn.: A “search and seizure warrant” not only authorized seizure of defendant’s computer but its search

A “search and seizure warrant” not only authorized seizure of defendant’s computer but its search. “Defendant’s argument that the search warrant authorized the seizure—but not the search—of his computer, phone, and computer storage media strains the bounds of logic and … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Protective sweep, Scope of search, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.Minn.: A “search and seizure warrant” not only authorized seizure of defendant’s computer but its search