D.Minn.: Seizure of emails implicated A-C privilege and are subject to suppression

The defendant raised attorney-client privilege against the seizure of emails to lawyers and then CPAs retained by his tax lawyers. The former was determined to be waived. The latter, however, remained privileged. United States v. Adams, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41165 (D. Minn. Mar. 13, 2018).

Defendant’s claim that defense counsel was ineffective for not moving to suppress was rejected on the merits of the search. The officers did not exceed the scope of the search warrant. Lynn v. State, 2018 Ga. App. LEXIS 194 (Mar. 15, 2018).*

This entry was posted in E-mail, Privileges, Scope of search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.