Category Archives: Arrest or entry on arrest

W.D.La.: Parole search waiver applies to the car def borrowed since he had standing in it

Defendant’s parole search condition extended to a car he borrowed. After all, he had sufficient connection to the car to have standing to challenge a search. United States v. Meaux, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189415 (W.D. La. Oct. 27, 2017), … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Parole search waiver applies to the car def borrowed since he had standing in it

TX13: Search incident can occur before formal arrest as long as both are justified

Search incident can occur before formal arrest as long as both are justified. Hill v. State, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 10749 (Tex. App. – Corpus Christi – Edinburg, Nov. 16, 2017) (memorandum).* Appellant’s claims that VA attorneys hacked her computer … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Search incident | Comments Off on TX13: Search incident can occur before formal arrest as long as both are justified

D.N.M.: Officers did not have reason to believe defendant was the person named in his arrest warrant when they detained him; arrest suppressed

The US Marshals did not have a reasonable articulable basis that defendant was the person named in their arrest warrant at the time they detained him on it, and the product of the arrest is suppressed. United States v. Morales, … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Officers did not have reason to believe defendant was the person named in his arrest warrant when they detained him; arrest suppressed

LA: Search incident can occur before formal arrest

The trial court denied the motion to suppress and the court of appeals reversed. When defendant’s name came back as having a warrant, the fact the search occurred before the formal arrest doesn’t matter. State v. Owens, 2017 La. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Search incident | Comments Off on LA: Search incident can occur before formal arrest

Cert. granted: Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, Florida: Whether the existence of probable cause defeats a First Amendment retaliatory-arrest claim as a matter of law.

Cert. granted: Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, Florida (ScotusBlog) Issue: Whether the existence of probable cause defeats a First Amendment retaliatory-arrest claim as a matter of law. See Miami Herald: First the city sunk his houseboat. Now, he’s at … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on Cert. granted: Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, Florida: Whether the existence of probable cause defeats a First Amendment retaliatory-arrest claim as a matter of law.

IA: Dad can’t raise son’s rights when son was arrested and gave dad up as his source of drugs

Defendant’s juvenile son was selling from his dad’s stash. After the son’s arrest, he gave up his source. Defendant can’t raise violations of his son’s Fourth and Fifth Amendment or statutory rights as a juvenile to challenge the probable cause … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Standing | Comments Off on IA: Dad can’t raise son’s rights when son was arrested and gave dad up as his source of drugs

N.D.Fla.: Entry into motel room was valid with arrest warrant when officers reasonably believed he would be there

The U.S. Marshal’s fugitive task force, with arrest warrant in hand, was looking for defendant. They were watching his motel room and saw him outside and gave chase. They lost sight of him and circled back to his hotel room … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on N.D.Fla.: Entry into motel room was valid with arrest warrant when officers reasonably believed he would be there

CA7: Hot pursuit of a purported drug dealer into ptf’s house was valid under Santana

The police approached a young man on the street in an area known for drug trade to talk to him. He “turned on his heels” and fled, with the police in pursuit, right to plaintiffs’ house, past one plaintiff out … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Hot pursuit | Comments Off on CA7: Hot pursuit of a purported drug dealer into ptf’s house was valid under Santana

OR: Def’s motion to suppress that he was subjected to an “unlawful warrantless arrest” sufficiently put the state on notice that it had to show PC

Defendant was walking four blocks from the area of a disturbance talking on a cell phone. When officers confronted him and commanded he stop, he “bladed up” and reached for a back pocket, making the officers fear he was armed. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: Def’s motion to suppress that he was subjected to an “unlawful warrantless arrest” sufficiently put the state on notice that it had to show PC

E.D.Mich.: Seeing def in house of another permitted entry to arrest on an arrest warrant

Seeing defendant in the house of another was justification for entry into the home to arrest him on a warrant under Steagald. United States v. Terrell, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175483 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 24, 2017). Defendant was stopped for … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Seeing def in house of another permitted entry to arrest on an arrest warrant

NY: Threshold arrests remain valid in NYS

Defendant’s arrest at his threshold when he answered his door was valid. The court declines to overturn its “longstanding rule.” People v. Garvin, 2017 NY Slip Op 07382, 2017 N.Y. LEXIS 3201 (Oct. 24, 2017). There was reasonable suspicion defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY: Threshold arrests remain valid in NYS

DE: Warrantless entry into def’s home seeking a man for questioning in a week old murder violated 4A

Police had no warrant to enter defendant’s house looking for another person for questioning in a robbery-homicide, not to arrest him. The alleged need for a security sweep violated the Fourth Amendment because the police were searching for a third … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on DE: Warrantless entry into def’s home seeking a man for questioning in a week old murder violated 4A

WaPo: Editorial: A man was wrongly incarcerated for 77 days. D.C. needs to find out why [he never saw a judge]

WaPo: Editorial: A man was wrongly incarcerated for 77 days. D.C. needs to find out why. INSTANCES OF people illegally imprisoned – without legitimate cause and denied the chance to see a judge or lawyer – may be commonplace in … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on WaPo: Editorial: A man was wrongly incarcerated for 77 days. D.C. needs to find out why [he never saw a judge]

KY: Arrest outside a dwelling doesn’t justify a protective sweep inside

An arrest outside an apartment doesn’t justify a protective sweep inside. There was no sufficient emergency to justify an entry into the apartment. Exclusion is the proper remedy. Pace v. Commonwealth, 2017 Ky. LEXIS 389 (March 23, 2017), modified Sept. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Protective sweep | Comments Off on KY: Arrest outside a dwelling doesn’t justify a protective sweep inside

E.D.Mich.: Arrest warrant for another in def’s home didn’t authorize entry without exigency

An arrest warrant for Tyler in defendant’s home didn’t justify entry here because officers didn’t show any exception to the warrant requirement. “The government has provided no authority for the proposition that the arrest warrant for Tyler, Tyler’s status as … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Arrest warrant for another in def’s home didn’t authorize entry without exigency

MA: Trial court suppression of confession on tape was clearly erroneous; with PC to arrest, def’s clothing could be seized and forensically tested

The trial court’s order suppressing defendant’s confession and the subsequent search of his clothing is reversed as clearly erroneous. Defendant’s arrest was with probable cause, and that allowed seizure and forensic testing of his clothing. Commonwealth v. Tremblay, 2017 Mass. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Scope of search, Search incident | Comments Off on MA: Trial court suppression of confession on tape was clearly erroneous; with PC to arrest, def’s clothing could be seized and forensically tested

MI: If the arrest is invalid, the inventory that follows it is invalid

If the arrest is invalid, the inventory that follows it is invalid. People v. Wood, 2017 Mich. App. LEXIS 1482 (Sept. 19, 2017). Defendant’s admission he had open containers in the vehicle justified a search for them, and, after they … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Inventory | Comments Off on MI: If the arrest is invalid, the inventory that follows it is invalid

CA9: Arrest on mistaken identity gets QI, but continuing the arrest after learning mistake doesn’t; Summers doesn’t apply to arrest warrants

Plaintiff’s initial arrest on mistaken identity was not in violation of clearly established law, and, thus, the officers had qualified immunity. After learning, however, that plaintiff was not the person sought, officers did violate the Fourth Amendment by keeping him … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Arrest on mistaken identity gets QI, but continuing the arrest after learning mistake doesn’t; Summers doesn’t apply to arrest warrants

OH: Def has no standing in place of another that he was arrested in, so Steagald provides him no relief

Defendant could not show he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the premises of a third person, although he was the person being looked for. The court discusses Steagald and the Ninth Circuit’s en banc Underwood (1983, Treatise §§ … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Standing | Comments Off on OH: Def has no standing in place of another that he was arrested in, so Steagald provides him no relief

CA1: There was no “doorway arrest” under Santana when ptf was behind a locked door the entire time

Police entered plaintiff’s house without a warrant to arrest him. An hour had passed, and any exigency was long gone. As for whether this could be a “doorway arrest” under Santana, that too is rejected because plaintiff was behind a … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA1: There was no “doorway arrest” under Santana when ptf was behind a locked door the entire time