Category Archives: Automobile exception

OR: Automobile exception applies to any lawful stop where PC of a crime develops

The automobile exception applies when a vehicle is lawfully stopped for any reason and then probable cause develops. State v. Bliss, 283 Ore. App. 833, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 256 (Feb. 23, 2017). Defendant requested a meeting with the police … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Seizure | Comments Off on OR: Automobile exception applies to any lawful stop where PC of a crime develops

NE: Automobile exception depends upon its mobility, not on def’s ability to move it

The automobile depends only on the mobility of the vehicle and not on whether defendant could be the one moving it. Even if he’s in custody, the vehicle is still movable. State v. Rocha, 295 Neb. 716, 2017 Neb. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on NE: Automobile exception depends upon its mobility, not on def’s ability to move it

IA: CoA declines to obviate the automobile exception; that’s up to state SCt if it ever happens

“On appeal, Wagamon ‘urges that now is the time to determine if the automobile exception is out of date and incompatible with the protections offered by the Iowa Constitution.’” That’s the prerogative only of the state supreme court. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on IA: CoA declines to obviate the automobile exception; that’s up to state SCt if it ever happens

W.D.Pa.: After gun was found in car, search incident and automobile exception didn’t apply, but inventory was inevitable [right result, wrong reasoning]

After defendant’s car was stopped, the officers conducted a Michigan v. Long protective weapons search of the car while gaining control of the defendant, and a gun was located. There was a search incident: “Furthermore, he was standing at the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Inventory, Protective sweep, Search incident | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: After gun was found in car, search incident and automobile exception didn’t apply, but inventory was inevitable [right result, wrong reasoning]

S.D.Cal.: Def, a citizen of Mexico suspected of drug trafficking in his mother’s car, was lawfully arrested when he was lured to a border crossing to talk about her permanent resident status

Defendant’s mother, a citizen of Mexico who crossed regularly at Tecate, was arrested for importation of meth in her car, which she claimed was a gift from her son. Officers were looking for him and finally found him in Mexico … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Border search | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Def, a citizen of Mexico suspected of drug trafficking in his mother’s car, was lawfully arrested when he was lured to a border crossing to talk about her permanent resident status

KS: Getting in car after a drug deal makes its search subject to search incident and automobile exception

Defendant did a drug deal with narcs and had $220 in cash with recorded numbers. He got in his car. On the stop of the car, the search for the $220 was justified by either search incident to arrest or … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Search incident | Comments Off on KS: Getting in car after a drug deal makes its search subject to search incident and automobile exception

E.D.Pa.: Court just doesn’t buy officer’s story about seeing gun; suppressed

The court just doesn’t believe the officer’s testimony that he saw a gun to justify an engine compartment search under the automobile exception. The government’s fallback position that it was valid as a Terry frisk is also rejected for lack … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Burden of proof | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Court just doesn’t buy officer’s story about seeing gun; suppressed

IA: Passenger’s open container seen in parked car didn’t justify search of car console

Defendant’s car was parked about midnight in June with the windows down and the radio loud. He, the driver, was standing outside the car. The passenger was still inside. Officers stopped and approached the car. They saw the passenger had … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Search incident | Comments Off on IA: Passenger’s open container seen in parked car didn’t justify search of car console

ND: Telephone call from ID’d caller about a shooting in a house was exigency for entry

A telephone call from an alleged shooting victim’s brother about the shooting was objectively reasonable for exigency when corroborated with the fact that the victim wasn’t immediately found when officers arrived. State v. Karna, 2016 ND 232, 2016 N.D. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on ND: Telephone call from ID’d caller about a shooting in a house was exigency for entry

D.Nev.: GPS warrant based on transaction from car three weeks earlier wasn’t stale

A GPS tracking warrant wasn’t stale based on a drug deal out of the car three weeks earlier. That led to probable cause to stop and search the vehicle two weeks later. United States v. Cabrera, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Nev.: GPS warrant based on transaction from car three weeks earlier wasn’t stale

NY1: Search of a car doesn’t have to occur at the scene of stop

Defendant was stopped, and the smell of marijuana came from the car when he was stopped. A joint was seen on the console. The car was towed rather than searched at the scene. The search back at the station was … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Inventory | Comments Off on NY1: Search of a car doesn’t have to occur at the scene of stop

OR: State carries burden of proving the reliability of the drug dog in the first instance (under state const.)

“Here, we easily conclude that the state did not create a sufficient record to support the use of Quincy’s alert as a basis for probable cause to search the car. At the suppression hearing, the state elicited testimony from Raiser … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Dog sniff, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: State carries burden of proving the reliability of the drug dog in the first instance (under state const.)

TN: Blood on def’s sock supported PC for automobile exception

Based on blood on defendant’s sock, on the totality there was probable cause to believe that more possible blood evidence would be found in his car. That was sufficient for the automobile exception to apply. State v. Peden, 2016 Tenn. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: Blood on def’s sock supported PC for automobile exception

NM: Driver’s failure to produce proof of registration and insurance doesn’t permit search of console

Defendant’s failure to produce his registration and proof of insurance during a traffic stop didn’t give the officer justification to search the center console for it himself. Thus, defense counsel was ineffective for not raising this issue. State v. Howl, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on NM: Driver’s failure to produce proof of registration and insurance doesn’t permit search of console

VA: Mobility for automobile exception doesn’t depend on fact def would be arrested as soon as he got on the motorcycle

The mobility basis for the automobile exception has nothing to do with whether the officer watching would have been able to apprehend defendant if he suddenly appeared and tried to drive the motorcycle off. “Moreover, ‘[a] vehicle’s inherent mobility—not the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on VA: Mobility for automobile exception doesn’t depend on fact def would be arrested as soon as he got on the motorcycle

OH5: Def’s wrecked empty car on road to house justified entry onto curtilage to check on potential injury

Defendant’s car was upside down and there was blood on the passenger air bag. Nobody was there. The officer went to the house where the car was registered to find the driver and passenger. “Present in this case was a … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Curtilage, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on OH5: Def’s wrecked empty car on road to house justified entry onto curtilage to check on potential injury

ID: Officer telling defendant to set aside because he was looking for a man with a warrant was not a seizure

When the officer came to defendant’s house, he said he was looking for another person, and asked defendant to move back. A reasonable person in his position would not have felt free to leave. Thus, when defendant was confronted outside … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ID: Officer telling defendant to set aside because he was looking for a man with a warrant was not a seizure

M.D.Fla.: The automobile exception is based on inherent mobility, and the fact the defendant is handcuffed and the police have the keys is “inconsequential”

The automobile exception is based on inherent mobility, and the fact the defendant is handcuffed and the police have the keys is “inconsequential.” United States v. Collins, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101003 (M.D.Fla. May 31, 2016), adopted, 2016 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: The automobile exception is based on inherent mobility, and the fact the defendant is handcuffed and the police have the keys is “inconsequential”

MO: Where there’s PC to believe evidence is in a vehicle, it may be seized to remove it for search

When there is probable cause to believe a vehicle contains criminal evidence, exigent circumstances can support its seizure pending determination whether to search it under the automobile exception or to remove it to a secure location for search. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on MO: Where there’s PC to believe evidence is in a vehicle, it may be seized to remove it for search

D.Ore.: No territorial limitation for SW to Facebook under § 2703

“The territorial limitation in Rule 41 … does not limit warrants issued pursuant to [18 U.S.C.] § 2703.” A search warrant for Facebook in another jurisdiction was valid. United States v. Bundy, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94476 (D.Ore. July 20, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Computer and cloud searches, F.R.Crim.P. 41 | Comments Off on D.Ore.: No territorial limitation for SW to Facebook under § 2703