Category Archives: Automobile exception

D.Nev.: GPS warrant based on transaction from car three weeks earlier wasn’t stale

A GPS tracking warrant wasn’t stale based on a drug deal out of the car three weeks earlier. That led to probable cause to stop and search the vehicle two weeks later. United States v. Cabrera, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Nev.: GPS warrant based on transaction from car three weeks earlier wasn’t stale

NY1: Search of a car doesn’t have to occur at the scene of stop

Defendant was stopped, and the smell of marijuana came from the car when he was stopped. A joint was seen on the console. The car was towed rather than searched at the scene. The search back at the station was … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Inventory | Comments Off on NY1: Search of a car doesn’t have to occur at the scene of stop

OR: State carries burden of proving the reliability of the drug dog in the first instance (under state const.)

“Here, we easily conclude that the state did not create a sufficient record to support the use of Quincy’s alert as a basis for probable cause to search the car. At the suppression hearing, the state elicited testimony from Raiser … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Dog sniff, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: State carries burden of proving the reliability of the drug dog in the first instance (under state const.)

TN: Blood on def’s sock supported PC for automobile exception

Based on blood on defendant’s sock, on the totality there was probable cause to believe that more possible blood evidence would be found in his car. That was sufficient for the automobile exception to apply. State v. Peden, 2016 Tenn. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: Blood on def’s sock supported PC for automobile exception

NM: Driver’s failure to produce proof of registration and insurance doesn’t permit search of console

Defendant’s failure to produce his registration and proof of insurance during a traffic stop didn’t give the officer justification to search the center console for it himself. Thus, defense counsel was ineffective for not raising this issue. State v. Howl, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on NM: Driver’s failure to produce proof of registration and insurance doesn’t permit search of console

VA: Mobility for automobile exception doesn’t depend on fact def would be arrested as soon as he got on the motorcycle

The mobility basis for the automobile exception has nothing to do with whether the officer watching would have been able to apprehend defendant if he suddenly appeared and tried to drive the motorcycle off. “Moreover, ‘[a] vehicle’s inherent mobility—not the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on VA: Mobility for automobile exception doesn’t depend on fact def would be arrested as soon as he got on the motorcycle

OH5: Def’s wrecked empty car on road to house justified entry onto curtilage to check on potential injury

Defendant’s car was upside down and there was blood on the passenger air bag. Nobody was there. The officer went to the house where the car was registered to find the driver and passenger. “Present in this case was a … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Curtilage, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on OH5: Def’s wrecked empty car on road to house justified entry onto curtilage to check on potential injury

ID: Officer telling defendant to set aside because he was looking for a man with a warrant was not a seizure

When the officer came to defendant’s house, he said he was looking for another person, and asked defendant to move back. A reasonable person in his position would not have felt free to leave. Thus, when defendant was confronted outside … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ID: Officer telling defendant to set aside because he was looking for a man with a warrant was not a seizure

M.D.Fla.: The automobile exception is based on inherent mobility, and the fact the defendant is handcuffed and the police have the keys is “inconsequential”

The automobile exception is based on inherent mobility, and the fact the defendant is handcuffed and the police have the keys is “inconsequential.” United States v. Collins, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101003 (M.D.Fla. May 31, 2016), adopted, 2016 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: The automobile exception is based on inherent mobility, and the fact the defendant is handcuffed and the police have the keys is “inconsequential”

MO: Where there’s PC to believe evidence is in a vehicle, it may be seized to remove it for search

When there is probable cause to believe a vehicle contains criminal evidence, exigent circumstances can support its seizure pending determination whether to search it under the automobile exception or to remove it to a secure location for search. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on MO: Where there’s PC to believe evidence is in a vehicle, it may be seized to remove it for search

D.Ore.: No territorial limitation for SW to Facebook under § 2703

“The territorial limitation in Rule 41 … does not limit warrants issued pursuant to [18 U.S.C.] § 2703.” A search warrant for Facebook in another jurisdiction was valid. United States v. Bundy, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94476 (D.Ore. July 20, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Computer and cloud searches, F.R.Crim.P. 41 | Comments Off on D.Ore.: No territorial limitation for SW to Facebook under § 2703

IA: School officials had RS to search football player’s equipment bag on hearing metal clunk

Defendant was a high school football player injured during a game, and he went to the hospital. He was expressly concerned about the contents of his school-issued equipment bag to the point that school officials nearly had reasonable suspicion. When … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion, School searches | Comments Off on IA: School officials had RS to search football player’s equipment bag on hearing metal clunk

OH7 follows Hudson; failure to knock-and-announce doesn’t warrant suppression

A failure to properly knock-and-announce an entry does not warrant suppression, following Hudson v. Michigan. State v. Bembry, 2015-Ohio-5598, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 5397 (7th Dist. December 30, 2015). [Yes, just now on Lexis.] The motion to suppress is denied … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Knock and announce | Comments Off on OH7 follows Hudson; failure to knock-and-announce doesn’t warrant suppression

W.D.N.Y.: No point in reopening suppression hearing for new evidence that won’t change the outcome

Defendant sought to reopen the suppression hearing, and it’s denied because the new evidence wouldn’t alter the outcome at all on the question of apparent consent. United States v. Archambault, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61783 (W.D.N.Y. May 9, 2016). “The … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Burden of proof | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: No point in reopening suppression hearing for new evidence that won’t change the outcome

OH9: Taking def’s purse from car as she’s going to jail and searching it justified by auto exception or inventory

When defendant was arrested, the officer took her purse out of the car so it could go to jail with her. The search of the purse was valid as inventory or under the automobile exception. Also, Ohio recognizes good faith … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Drug or alcohol testing, Inventory | Comments Off on OH9: Taking def’s purse from car as she’s going to jail and searching it justified by auto exception or inventory

W.D.Mo.: Just because def ran away from the car, it was still “readily mobile” for the automobile exception

“His argument is that because the car was parked and defendant had run away from the car, it was ‘not mobile within the meaning of the Carroll/Chambers exception.’ Not surprisingly, defendant cites no case law to support this argument; and … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Community caretaking function | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Just because def ran away from the car, it was still “readily mobile” for the automobile exception

AL: Controlled buys were PC for car search

A search warrant was issued for defendant’s home, and he was also involved in three controlled buys from his car. His stop miles from the search of his house was based on the probable cause from the buys, not the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AL: Controlled buys were PC for car search

CA11: Luggage dog alerts to on interstate bus is subject to automobile exception

Defendant was apparently a regular passenger on El Expreso bus traveling from Florida to Texas and back. Intel briefings told him that heroin was being concealed in large cans of food. Defendant had a large can of food in his … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on CA11: Luggage dog alerts to on interstate bus is subject to automobile exception

TX1: Frequenting bar known for drug sales, going in and out repeatedly, and furtive gestures when stopped was PC

Officers had probable cause under the automobile exception to search defendant’s truck, or at least the trial court had a basis for finding it. Defendant had entered a bar known for drug sales that the police were surveilling. He’d been … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Standards of review | Comments Off on TX1: Frequenting bar known for drug sales, going in and out repeatedly, and furtive gestures when stopped was PC

RI: Stop was pretextual; court doesn’t believe that officer smelled MJ

Defendant’s car was stopped on the RI turnpike for no seatbelts after being noticed at a toll booth. The stop was valid. The officer saw a pill bottle in a mesh holder on the driver’s door, and then he announced … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on RI: Stop was pretextual; court doesn’t believe that officer smelled MJ