Category Archives: Emergency / exigency

Cal.2d: Emergency aid search of wrong house was still objectively reasonable

Based on a police dispatch of a screaming woman who was also moaning in distress, the police went to the address (2314) given and entered. They did not find the woman and kept looking upstairs and in closets and found … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonableness | Comments Off on Cal.2d: Emergency aid search of wrong house was still objectively reasonable

W.D.Ky.: Police responding to a panic alarm developed PC for a SW from MJ smell

Police responded to a panic alarm at defendant’s home. He was defensive and really didn’t want them around. They could smell burnt marijuana coming from the house. A sweep was conducted, and then the police obtained a search warrant. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Police responding to a panic alarm developed PC for a SW from MJ smell

W.D.Ky.: A safe can’t be seized under plain view during an emergency entry after a shooting; its contents are unknown

“Here, police were investigating a serious crime involving gunfire and could not account for a victim. Based on the totality of evidence that the officers were aware of at the time they decided to make entry into the residence, it … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: A safe can’t be seized under plain view during an emergency entry after a shooting; its contents are unknown

M.D.Pa.: Knocking and getting no answer is not exigency

The entry into defendant’s house on probable cause but without an arrest warrant was unreasonable. The officers claimed exigency from the fact they announced and nobody answered. After the entry, the police went to defendant’s wife and told her of … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Knocking and getting no answer is not exigency

E.D.Tex.: Suicide by cop as exigency requires actual engagement with law enforcement

The government’s claim of exigency from an alleged fear of “suicide by cop” is rejected here. “The Government invokes the inherent danger of suicide and, in particular, suicide by cop, but suicide by cop requires engagement with law enforcement. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Suicide by cop as exigency requires actual engagement with law enforcement

CA9: Hearing apparent domestic abuse inside from choking and threatening to use a gun justified police entry

“The district court properly concluded that probable cause and exigent circumstances justified the police officers’ warrantless entry into the apartment. The officers heard Harris and Leanna Devad fighting; witnesses reported hearing choking sounds and hearing Devad say that Harris had … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA9: Hearing apparent domestic abuse inside from choking and threatening to use a gun justified police entry

OH7: House door wide open, no cars in driveway, skittish dog and a lot of dog feces justified entry on exigency

The emergency aid exception justified entry into defendant’s house where the officer reasonably feared the owner or occupant of the house was in some sort of danger based upon the front door being wide open in the middle of winter, … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on OH7: House door wide open, no cars in driveway, skittish dog and a lot of dog feces justified entry on exigency

OH5: Statute makes meth lab exigency per se; entry to freeze premises for SW reasonable

Ohio statute states that a methamphetamine lab is per se an exigency, and the officer’s seizure without a search warrant to get a search warrant was reasonable. State v. Umstead, 2017-Ohio-698, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 691 (5th Dist. Feb. 24, … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH5: Statute makes meth lab exigency per se; entry to freeze premises for SW reasonable

CA4: Pre-Rodriguez stop was valid under law at time

Rodriguez was decided after the stop, and the circuit recognized de minimus delays in the stop. Moreover, the stop is not calculated merely by time: “Under Digiovanni and other pre-Rodriguez cases, that Deputy McMurray may have been able to end … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA4: Pre-Rodriguez stop was valid under law at time

D.Ore.: Def stopped at roadblock from Malheur National Wildlife Refuge could be searched again after he went back to talk others into leaving

Defendant arrived at the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in January 2016. After arrests and the killing of one, he decided to leave and encountered a roadblock where he was briefly searched. Officers asked if he would go back to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep, Roadblocks | Comments Off on D.Ore.: Def stopped at roadblock from Malheur National Wildlife Refuge could be searched again after he went back to talk others into leaving

D.Conn.: Shots fired call is not per se exigency; totality standard must apply

A shots fired call is not carte blanche exigency–the totality of circumstances must still be examined. Here, the court finds no exigency for the warrantless entry or protective sweep and that the exclusionary rule should be applied. The costs aren’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Exclusionary rule, Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Shots fired call is not per se exigency; totality standard must apply

D.Nev.: No actual or apparent authority to consent shown; presence of gun in motel room not exigency per se

Actual authority to consent and apparent authority in a motel room are two different things. Here, the government can’t show either on this record. The possibility of a gun in the room is not an exigent circumstance. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Emergency / exigency, Inventory | Comments Off on D.Nev.: No actual or apparent authority to consent shown; presence of gun in motel room not exigency per se

NY Co.Ct.: Need for an emergency entry doesn’t need to rise to PC

Uncorroborated hearsay statement defendant was suicidal was still enough for an emergency entry. The need for an emergency entry doesn’t even necessarily have to rise to the level of probable cause. People v. Ormanian, 2016 NY Slip Op 26456, 2016 … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on NY Co.Ct.: Need for an emergency entry doesn’t need to rise to PC

M.D.La.: Officer’s claim of a burglary in progress and that a protective sweep was justified was completely unjustified

It should have been apparent to the officers that the defendant was a friend of the homeowner and was a guest in the premises, and their entry was unjustified under a claim of a burglary in progress or that a … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Officer’s claim of a burglary in progress and that a protective sweep was justified was completely unjustified

NM: No proof of common authority for consent by an occasional visitor; state doesn’t recognize apparent authority

The evidence did not show the consenter had common authority, and New Mexico does not recognize apparent authority. The exception for protective sweep and the community caretaking function also didn’t apply because there was no bona fide need for either. … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on NM: No proof of common authority for consent by an occasional visitor; state doesn’t recognize apparent authority

S.D.Ind.: Spending money is not an exigent circumstance justifying a warrantless search to recover the money

Defendant spending money is not an exigent circumstance justifying a warrantless search to recover the money. United States v. Jett, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13544 (S.D. Ind. Feb. 1, 2017):

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: Spending money is not an exigent circumstance justifying a warrantless search to recover the money

AZ: Implied consent to treatment must be shown for obtaining blood sample from medical care provider for DUI

When a DUI suspect is unconscious, the state must still prove at least implied consent to medical treatment to get a blood draw from the medical care provider. State v. Nissley, 2017 Ariz. LEXIS 24 (Feb. 1, 2017), vacating 238 … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on AZ: Implied consent to treatment must be shown for obtaining blood sample from medical care provider for DUI

ID: Driving on a suspended DL supports a search incident of the person

The officer knew defendant had a suspended DL, and seeing him drive to a convenience store justified his detention and arrest. A frisk incident to the arrest produced drug paraphernalia which was validly found. State v. Lee, 2017 Ida. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Search incident | Comments Off on ID: Driving on a suspended DL supports a search incident of the person

LA1: DNA testing for paternity testing is governed by the 4A

Court ordered DNA testing for paternity is a search under the Fourth Amendment, but it is reasonable. L.J.D. v. M.V.S, 2017 La. App. LEXIS 107 n.8 (La.App. 1 Cir. Jan. 25, 2017). The police knew three weeks ahead of time … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on LA1: DNA testing for paternity testing is governed by the 4A

KY: Blood and debris trail to def’s open door and his refusal to talk about who was inside or what happened justified entry

Exigent circumstances justified the officers’ entry into defendant’s home. There was a blood trail that did not go all the way back to his apartment, but there was a debris trail, too, he was badly hurt and bleeding, and he … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on KY: Blood and debris trail to def’s open door and his refusal to talk about who was inside or what happened justified entry