Category Archives: Curtilage

NC: Where def’s front door obviously wasn’t used, it was reasonable to go to nearest side door for knock-and-talk; MJ in plain view

Officers came to defendant’s house to do a knock-and-talk based on reports he was growing marijuana. The front door was covered in plastic and appeared to have furniture blocking it, so they went to the nearest door, on the side … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on NC: Where def’s front door obviously wasn’t used, it was reasonable to go to nearest side door for knock-and-talk; MJ in plain view

D.V.I.: “Casing” the premises from the street as a prelude to a knock-and-talk does not violate the curtilage

“Casing” the premises from the street as a prelude to a knock-and-talk does not violate the curtilage. United States v. Lubrin, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9682 (D.V.I. January 28, 2015). The officer had reasonable suspicion to continue the detention on … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.V.I.: “Casing” the premises from the street as a prelude to a knock-and-talk does not violate the curtilage

IL: Officers investigating noise complaint at house could go to back door when nobody answered front door

Officers investigating a noise complaint could go to the back door of the subject residence when nobody answered the front door and there was apparently somebody home. People v. Cannon, 2015 IL App (3d) 130672, 2015 Ill. App. LEXIS 9 … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage | Comments Off on IL: Officers investigating noise complaint at house could go to back door when nobody answered front door

NC: Parking lot of a multi-unit apartment building is not curtilage

The parking lot of a multi-unit apartment building is not curtilage. Police seizure and testing of a discarded cigarette butt tossed there did not require a warrant. State v. Williford, 2015 N.C. App. LEXIS 1 (January 6, 2015). Defendant was … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Standing | Comments Off on NC: Parking lot of a multi-unit apartment building is not curtilage

TN: Officers could go to door of rear apartment for knock-and-talk

Defendant lived in a rear apartment on the property, so the police did not violate curtilage or a no trespassing sign by going to the rear door since it was his entry. After that, his consent to enter and search … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: Officers could go to door of rear apartment for knock-and-talk

TX13: Dog sniff on front porch ten months before Jardines was unreasonable; later consent tainted

On an anonymous and unverified crimestoppers tip, four officers and a drug dog show up at defendant’s house for a dog sniff of his front door, ten months before Jardines was decided. A 2003 Texas case from a different appellate … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Curtilage, Dog sniff | Comments Off on TX13: Dog sniff on front porch ten months before Jardines was unreasonable; later consent tainted

WI: Apartment building’s parking garage was not part of the apartment’s curtilage

An apartment building’s parking garage was not part of the apartment’s curtilage. “Dumstrey appeals from a judgment of conviction for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI), second offense. Dumstrey argues that the off-duty officer who pursued him in traffic … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WI: Apartment building’s parking garage was not part of the apartment’s curtilage

EFF: Federal Court Agrees with EFF, Throws Out Six Weeks of Warrantless Video Surveillance

EFF: Federal Court Agrees with EFF, Throws Out Six Weeks of Warrantless Video Surveillance by Hannui Fokhoury: The public got an early holiday gift today when a federal court agreed with us that six weeks of continually video recording the … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage | Tagged | Comments Off on EFF: Federal Court Agrees with EFF, Throws Out Six Weeks of Warrantless Video Surveillance

NE: No reasonable expectation of privacy in unfenced and unoccupied urban lot

Admitting that it has been less than clear in the past, the Nebraska Supreme Court holds that more than just probable cause is required to enter real property. Here, the entry was based on open fields to observe all the … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Open fields | Comments Off on NE: No reasonable expectation of privacy in unfenced and unoccupied urban lot

TX13 finds an “apartment curtilage” in dog sniff at door of inside apartment

Because defendant’s apartment was only one of two on the floor, and he kept plants outside the door, the court finds a curtilage in his apartment such that a dog sniff at the door invaded the curtilage. This situation is … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff | Comments Off on TX13 finds an “apartment curtilage” in dog sniff at door of inside apartment

W.D.N.Y.: SW for dumpsters here didn’t violate “business curtilage” nor a REP

A search warrant was issued for dumpsters on a “large commercial property” for evidence of asbestos dumping in violation of EPA law. Accepting that there might be a “business curtilage,” the court finds this search warrant didn’t violate any reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: SW for dumpsters here didn’t violate “business curtilage” nor a REP

IN: “No Trespassing” sign and cable across driveway defined curtilage under state constitution; entry required warrant

“No Trespassing” signs used to be not determinative of curtilage. It’s apparent they are becoming so. Here, the defendant had a cable across the driveway, a “No Trespassing” sign, and a surveillance camera. The police were not in hot pursuit … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, State constitution | Comments Off on IN: “No Trespassing” sign and cable across driveway defined curtilage under state constitution; entry required warrant

NC: When nobody answers door and apparently nobody home, going to back door because of barking dog violated curtilage

When officers doing a knock-and-talk get no answer at the front door and there’s no car in the driveway and no signs anybody’s home, they can’t go to the back door to see if the barking dog they heard belonged … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage | Comments Off on NC: When nobody answers door and apparently nobody home, going to back door because of barking dog violated curtilage

AR: Def’s rear door shown as door where knock always answered, so curtilage not violated

Defendant’s house had a circle drive and a front door and a back door. The back door was found a normal place of entry. At the suppression hearing, the officer testified that he’d been there before on official business and … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Curtilage, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on AR: Def’s rear door shown as door where knock always answered, so curtilage not violated

CA2: Entry into curtilage and shooting family dog in front of child not based on exigency

Officers entered the curtilage without a warrant or exigent circumstances and shot plaintiff’s dog in front of his 12 year old daughter. The verdict for the defendant officers is reversed and remanded for trial because they didn’t show reasons for … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Curtilage, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA2: Entry into curtilage and shooting family dog in front of child not based on exigency

OH9: Flyover gave PC for marijuana grow in backyard, but police needed a warrant to enter

After a marijuana eradication flyover, officers entered defendant’s fenced back yard without a warrant to seize plants. The warrantless entry violated the Fourth Amendment. They had probable cause, but the state was seeking to have defendant disprove exigency when it … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage | Comments Off on OH9: Flyover gave PC for marijuana grow in backyard, but police needed a warrant to enter

OR: The fact that the only way into defendant’s apartment was a backdoor was not implied consent for the police to enter the curtilage

Defendant’s apartment was only accessible by a backdoor on the curtilage. The fact that the only way into defendant’s apartment was a backdoor was not implied consent for the police to enter the curtilage, and it was apparently his curtilage, … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage | Comments Off on OR: The fact that the only way into defendant’s apartment was a backdoor was not implied consent for the police to enter the curtilage

MO: A search warrant for a residence includes buildings and vehicles on the curtilage

A search warrant for a residence includes buildings and vehicles on the curtilage. “The warrant also indicated that the residence has a basement, a two-car detached garage, and a wood-burning fireplace. The record indicates that the detached garage is located … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Curtilage, Inventory | Comments Off on MO: A search warrant for a residence includes buildings and vehicles on the curtilage

N.D.Iowa: Following defendant into his driveway did not violate curtilage

Following defendant into his driveway did not violate curtilage. The officer walked around the truck to see if it matched one in a store surveillance video. United States v. Rojas, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140708 (N.D. Iowa October 3, 2014), … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Following defendant into his driveway did not violate curtilage

WI: Police came to a trailer park the subject of an anonymous complaint and looked in windows; it was an illegal trespass and search

Narcs received an anonymous report of drug activity at 4:40 am in a trailer park, so they went and looked around. Going up to a window and peering in with a flashlight was an invalid trespass and search. This wasn’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Trespass | Comments Off on WI: Police came to a trailer park the subject of an anonymous complaint and looked in windows; it was an illegal trespass and search