NC: Where def’s front door obviously wasn’t used, it was reasonable to go to nearest side door for knock-and-talk; MJ in plain view

Officers came to defendant’s house to do a knock-and-talk based on reports he was growing marijuana. The front door was covered in plastic and appeared to have furniture blocking it, so they went to the nearest door, on the side of the house on the driveway. From there, they could see marijuana plants visible in the back yard. The officers did not violate the curtilage. State v. Grice, 367 N.C. 753, 767 S.E.2d 312 (2015), reversing 735 S.E.2d 354 (N.C. App. 2012).

13 minutes does not make a stop overlong, particularly when there is “reasonable suspicion from the outset.” State v. Morris, 2015 S.C. LEXIS 49 (January 28, 2015).*

The officer here responded to a shooting call, and, at the scene, found defendant hiding in the bushes, and it was apparent something was hidden in his pants. He patted defendant down, who objected to a “search,” but the officer said it was a patdown not a search. In his pants, a short barreled modified AK-47 to fire .22 rounds was found. The patdown was on more than a hunch and was valid. United States v. Torres, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181411 (N.D.Iowa December 23, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Curtilage, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.