Category Archives: Reasonable expectation of privacy

OH9: No standing in a package of drugs shipped to house in boyfriend’s name

A package containing cocaine was shipped to defendant’s house in the name of her boyfriend. She had no standing in the package because her name wasn’t on it. State v. Padilla, 2015-Ohio-4220, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 4112 (9th Dist. Oct. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on OH9: No standing in a package of drugs shipped to house in boyfriend’s name

D.Kan.: Burner phone and being from town of Sinaloa Drug Cartel were factors in reasonable suspicion

“Deputy Jimerson is trained in drug interdiction and has previously testified as an expert witness on interdiction. During the stop, he saw the defendants were speaking on Tracfones when he approached the car, which he knows to be commonly used … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Burner phone and being from town of Sinaloa Drug Cartel were factors in reasonable suspicion

E.D.La.: Robert Durst case: One does not lose REP in a hotel room by registering under an alias

Robert Durst was believed to be on the run after the HBO series “The Jinx,” where he allegedly admitted a connection to a 10 year old homicide in Los Angeles. He was found by the FBI in the Marriott in … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Robert Durst case: One does not lose REP in a hotel room by registering under an alias

D.Conn.: Police entry into public bar area clearly within Fourth Amendment; customers have no right to have sex in public

The Fourth Amendment claim that police entered the bar area of the plaintiff’s business because of police calls fails because it was open to the public. The selective enforcement claim fails on the facts. There is no First Amendment right … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Police entry into public bar area clearly within Fourth Amendment; customers have no right to have sex in public

TX11: College student has REP in dorm room

A college student has a reasonable expectation of privacy in her dorm room from an entry by the police. The fact the resident assistant could look in there wasn’t determinative. State v. Rodriguez, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 9972 (Tex. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on TX11: College student has REP in dorm room

N.D.Ill.: No REP in the hallway of a U-Haul storage facility from a dog sniff

Defendant did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the hallway of a U-Haul storage facility. Thus, a dog sniff there was probable cause for a search warrant for the storage unit. United States v. Flores, 2015 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: No REP in the hallway of a U-Haul storage facility from a dog sniff

W.D.Okla.: The detailed nature of how CP file sharing tracking software works isn’t required to show PC

In a child pornography investigation, DHS used investigative software named Torrential Downpour which is used to track file sharing on P2P computers looking for child porn for transfer and monitoring data flow. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: The detailed nature of how CP file sharing tracking software works isn’t required to show PC

NJ: Stashing drugs in another person’s drainpipe shows no REP

Defendant who hid drugs in the drainpipe of a neighbor’s house had no standing to challenge a search of the drainpipe. While evidence at the trial differed, this did not give the defendant the right to reopen the suppression hearing. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on NJ: Stashing drugs in another person’s drainpipe shows no REP

WI: No REP in a text message sent to another cell phone

A person has a reasonable expectation of privacy in text messages in his own phone, but not the text messages in another phone that he sent. Once a text message is released, all control over it is lost. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on WI: No REP in a text message sent to another cell phone

D.Mass.: A paying passenger in a cab has a reasonable expectation of privacy in the passenger compartment

“While the question is close,” the court concludes that a paying passenger in a livery car has a reasonable expectation of privacy in the passenger area of the cab from the police, relying on United States v. Woodrum, 202 F.3d … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on D.Mass.: A paying passenger in a cab has a reasonable expectation of privacy in the passenger compartment

SC: Turning computer over to repair tech when it wouldn’t boot was waiver of REP in the data because the hard drive needed repair

Defendant turned her computer over to a repair technician when it wouldn’t boot. He was copying files from the hard drive to backup the data before attempting to fix it, and he saw a questionable image suggesting child exploitation. Coincidentally, … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Nexus, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on SC: Turning computer over to repair tech when it wouldn’t boot was waiver of REP in the data because the hard drive needed repair

The Marshall Project: A Phone Call From Jail? Better Watch What You Say

The Marshall Project: A Phone Call From Jail? Better Watch What You Say by Ken Armstrong: A confession, a threat—it’s probably taped. And admissible. Although people do things against their own interest all the time, even the police can be … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on The Marshall Project: A Phone Call From Jail? Better Watch What You Say

D.Colo.: Motion for return of property denied until post-conviction process over

Defendants moved for return of their property after conviction and the appeal was affirmed. The government gets to keep it pending conclusion of any collateral review which might be filed. United States v. Banks, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107994 (D.Colo. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Standing | Comments Off on D.Colo.: Motion for return of property denied until post-conviction process over

IA: No REP when in custody on a civil commitment order

Defendant was picked up on an involuntary commitment order for drug addiction, and she was brought to a hospital and locked in a room. She was directed to dress out into a hospital gown to go to the psychiatric floor, … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on IA: No REP when in custody on a civil commitment order

AZ: Dog sniff in hotel hallway and knock-and-talk thereafter not unreasonable

About midnight, officers did a dog sniff in the hallway of defendant’s hotel, and the dog alerted on defendant’s door. There was no reasonable expectation of privacy in the hotel hallway, and hotel management permitted the dog to come in. … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on AZ: Dog sniff in hotel hallway and knock-and-talk thereafter not unreasonable

CA8: No REP in public areas of a store; telephonic warrant relied on in good faith; tribal judge not shown to not be neutral and detached because she had spoken out on def’s store

Defendant’s convenience store was arguably open, and he didn’t show that it was closed, for an officer to come in and observe synthetic marijuana for sale. He thus did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy. The officer obtained a … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA8: No REP in public areas of a store; telephonic warrant relied on in good faith; tribal judge not shown to not be neutral and detached because she had spoken out on def’s store

MD: Once DNA was lawfully seized, it can be compared to other samples at will

Defendant’s DNA was lawfully seized in the first place, and it could be compared thereafter to other samples for a match without it being an unreasonable search. The expectation of privacy ceased with the lawful seizure. Varriale v. State, 2015 … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on MD: Once DNA was lawfully seized, it can be compared to other samples at will

WaPo: Is credit card skimming a Fourth Amendment search?

WaPo: Is credit card skimming a Fourth Amendment search? by Orin Kerr: In United States v. Bah, [posted here] decided July 24th, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit handed down the first circuit ruling on whether skimming … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on WaPo: Is credit card skimming a Fourth Amendment search?

CA6: No REP in magnetic strips on back of credit and gift cards lawfully seized

Defendant was found with over 70 credit and gift cards. The court finds no reasonable expectation of privacy in the magnetic strips on the back. They are intended to be read when used, and they are not a constitutionally protected … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA6: No REP in magnetic strips on back of credit and gift cards lawfully seized

IA: Mistake of law doesn’t support stop (and doesn’t discuss Heien)

Defendant was sitting in a car on a parking lot with an open container, and an officer arrested for that and searched. The court of appeals reversed. The open container law clearly only applies to streets and highways and not … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IA: Mistake of law doesn’t support stop (and doesn’t discuss Heien)