Category Archives: Admissibility of evidence

D.Nev.: In a § 242 prosecution, defense expert can’t testify to PC

In a § 242 prosecution for violating civil rights, the defense proposed expert is barred from opinion on whether probable cause existed for the arrest. “Whether a given set of facts constitutes probable cause to arrest or charge for a … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Issue preclusion, Pretext, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Nev.: In a § 242 prosecution, defense expert can’t testify to PC

MA: Three SWs building on each other to ultimate PC

Here there were three search warrants. The second built on the first, and the third on the second, leading to a computer search that was founded on defendant disposing of a body. “When considering the foregoing details together, there was … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Body cameras, Custody, Probable cause | Comments Off on MA: Three SWs building on each other to ultimate PC

D.D.C.: Seizure of def’s car keys from his friend was without PC

“The seizure of the keys from Williams’s friend was unlawful because the officers did not have probable cause to believe that the keys were evidence of a crime and the plain view doctrine did not apply.” Motion to suppress granted … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Independent source, Probation / Parole search, Waiver | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Seizure of def’s car keys from his friend was without PC

OR: Backpack’s inventory on admission to treatment facility was reasonable

Police could inventory defendant’s backpack when he was picked up and transported to a treatment facility. Inventory was provided for by local ordinance. The same policies apply to inventory even if defendant isn’t in jail. State v. Wilcox, 335 Or … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Burden of proof, Curtilage, Inventory, Knock and talk, Probable cause | Comments Off on OR: Backpack’s inventory on admission to treatment facility was reasonable

N.D.Iowa: There was PC before the dog stuck his nose through the window

The dog sticking his nose through the window was a search, but the officers already had probable cause by then. Therefore, no exclusionary. United States v. Newberry, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 195271 (N.D. Iowa Oct. 28, 2024). On the government’s … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: There was PC before the dog stuck his nose through the window

W.D.Ky.: In a criminal trial against a police office for excessive force during a raid, is 404(b) evidence of other bad searches admissible?

Defendant is a police officer charged with deprivation of rights from firing a gun into a window with blinds drawn during execution of a search warrant. This is about his mistaken belief that an AR-15 was firing from inside, and … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: In a criminal trial against a police office for excessive force during a raid, is 404(b) evidence of other bad searches admissible?

TN: Def opened door to admit suppressed cell phone evidence by asking the one question too many

Defendant successfully kept out cell phone tracking records for lack of probable cause. “However, during trial, based on defense counsel’s question of whether there was any ‘physical evidence’ connecting Defendant to the case, the trial court ruled that Defendant opened … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Cell phones, Custody, Probable cause | Comments Off on TN: Def opened door to admit suppressed cell phone evidence by asking the one question too many

W.D.N.Y.: When police are told their arrestee isn’t in the house, they don’t have to believe it

When the police arrive for an arrest and the occupants say the guy they’re looking for isn’t there, police don’t have to credit that and just leave. Green-Page v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134563 (W.D.N.Y. July 30, 2024)* … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: When police are told their arrestee isn’t in the house, they don’t have to believe it

D.Mont.: FBI 302s not discoverable to aid in PC and particularity challenge

Defendant cannot get discovery of FBI 302s just to see if the search warrant was based on whatever information that would disclose. United States v. Purkey, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104824 (D. Mont. June 11, 2024). After all, the four … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Cell site location information, Motion to suppress, Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.Mont.: FBI 302s not discoverable to aid in PC and particularity challenge

MN: Jail call to delete Facebook pages because of incriminating information was PC for SW

Defendant told a person he called from jail to delete his Facebook accounts because of potentially incriminating evidence on it. The state showed probable cause and particularity for the Facebook warrant. State v. Sardina-Padilla, 2024 Minn. LEXIS 307 (June 12, … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Cell site location information, Probable cause, Social media warrants, Waiver | Comments Off on MN: Jail call to delete Facebook pages because of incriminating information was PC for SW

CA4: Alleged dirty cop involved in SW but not at trial wasn’t enough for new trial

An alleged dirty cop who didn’t testify at trial and was part of obtaining the search warrant was not enough to get a new trial. United States v. Banks, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 14273 (4th Cir. June 12, 2024). The … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Probable cause, Social media warrants | Comments Off on CA4: Alleged dirty cop involved in SW but not at trial wasn’t enough for new trial

TN: Redacted SW affidavit came in at trial by agreement; not plain error

The affidavit for a search warrant was redacted and admitted as evidence at trial by agreement. The issue was waived and is subject to plain error review, and it’s not plain error. Even if it was, it was harmless error … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Inventory, Waiver | Comments Off on TN: Redacted SW affidavit came in at trial by agreement; not plain error

CA4: Court instructing that the legality of searches were questions for the court wasn’t error

Defense counsel asked a question about something being in plain view which led to discussion of whether those words were an effort to challenge the search before the jury. The court instructed the jury that the legality of searches was … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA4: Court instructing that the legality of searches were questions for the court wasn’t error

MO: Collective knowledge for RS doesn’t require that every witness be called at the suppression hearing

Collective knowledge for reasonable suspicion doesn’t require that every witness be called at the suppression hearing. “While Appellant seemingly takes issue with the fact that the officer who took Victim’s report did not also testify, the Hensley test only requires … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Collective knowledge, Foreign searches, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MO: Collective knowledge for RS doesn’t require that every witness be called at the suppression hearing

UT: Emergency aid exception permitted entry for apparent homicide victim who was missing

The emergency aid exception permitted entry into this murder scene. The victim was the grandmother of a child who punctually picked the child up every day at school. When she didn’t show for hours, the school notified police. They went … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Emergency / exigency, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on UT: Emergency aid exception permitted entry for apparent homicide victim who was missing

N.D.W.Va.: “[T]he purpose of a motion to suppress is not to challenge the sufficiency or admissibility of evidence.” That’s for a motion in limine

“[T]he purpose of a motion to suppress is not to challenge the sufficiency or admissibility of evidence. See U.S. v. Musgrave, 726 F. Supp. 1027 (W.D.N.C. 1989) (‘As the Government contends … evidentiary issues are better addressed at trial through … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: “[T]he purpose of a motion to suppress is not to challenge the sufficiency or admissibility of evidence.” That’s for a motion in limine

S.D.Cal.: Challenge to PC for revo warrant has to be made in the district where the warrant comes from

Challenge to the probable cause for a revocation warrant has to be made in the district issuing it, not this one where defendant currently resides. United States v. Carranza-Cruz, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31590 (S.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2024).* The … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Issue preclusion, Waiver | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Challenge to PC for revo warrant has to be made in the district where the warrant comes from

OH10: Taking GSR at scene of shooting was with exigent circumstances

Taking GSR samples from defendant at the scene of a potential murder was with exigent circumstances and wasn’t intrusive. “As in Jarrell, the GSR evidence was highly evanescent evidence that was susceptible to destruction from simple activities like wiping one’s … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Consent, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on OH10: Taking GSR at scene of shooting was with exigent circumstances

VA: SW affidavit not admissible in a civil dispute where it contained multiple levels of hearsay

In a civil dispute over a condo, one party sought to use a search warrant affidavit as evidence, and they filed a motion in limine. The trial judge first denied it, then sua sponte granted it as the trial started. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence | Comments Off on VA: SW affidavit not admissible in a civil dispute where it contained multiple levels of hearsay

Cal.4: No REP from images caught by streetlight camera

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy from images taken on a street light camera where he parked his vehicle. Carpenter just doesn’t apply. Moreover, a store surveillance camera had him there, too. People v. Cartwright, 2024 Cal. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Pole cameras, Staleness | Comments Off on Cal.4: No REP from images caught by streetlight camera