Author Archives: Hall

CA9: 4 am knock-and-talk violated implied license of Jardines

Officers came to defendant’s house at 4 am for a knock-and-talk to arrest him. They heard a crashing noise in the backyard and found defendant there. The subsequent search of defendant’s house was presumptively unreasonable and without any lawful justification. … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Knock and talk, Nighttime search | Comments Off on CA9: 4 am knock-and-talk violated implied license of Jardines

AZ: Def’s past drug conviction wasn’t RS to extend stop for a dog sniff

Officers had no reasonable suspicion from defendants’ stop to conduct a dog sniff. The officer asked for consent and was denied. “I know my rights. I don’t have to let you search. I know what my fiancé is going to … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AZ: Def’s past drug conviction wasn’t RS to extend stop for a dog sniff

KY: Use of drug dog during stop unjustified and suppressed

Defendant was stopped for weaving. Before the stop, however, other officers and this officer had discussed defendant being involved with drugs. That played a part in following defendant, but he did, in fact, weave. After defendant passed field sobriety tests … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KY: Use of drug dog during stop unjustified and suppressed

KY: Lack of staleness is determined from the totality of circumstances if time not specifically stated

Defendant was snitched off as a drug dealer by his own son as a citizen informant. The specific time of the possession of drugs wasn’t specifically stated, but here it can be ascertained by the totality of circumstances. Stating when … Continue reading →

Posted in Staleness | Comments Off on KY: Lack of staleness is determined from the totality of circumstances if time not specifically stated

E.D.Ark.: Police received a tip of sex trafficking a minor; talking to the minor on the phone was PC

In a search of a hotel room and arrest for sex trafficking of a minor, officers talked to the minor by telephone and that was sufficient to provide probable cause without much need for corroboration. Here, there was a tip … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Police received a tip of sex trafficking a minor; talking to the minor on the phone was PC

WaPo: Court asks: Do police need a warrant to track your cellphone for months at a time?

WaPo: Court asks: Do police need a warrant to track your cellphone for months at a time? by Ann E. Marimow: Law enforcement officials have long relied on location details gleaned from cellphone towers as a powerful tool for tracing … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information | Comments Off on WaPo: Court asks: Do police need a warrant to track your cellphone for months at a time?

NYTimes: FBI may not need Apple to unlock San Bernardino shooter’s iPhone

NYTimes: FBI may not need Apple to unlock San Bernardino shooter’s iPhone by Ellen Nakashima: RIVERSIDE, Calif.— The FBI may have found a way without Apple’s assistance to unlock the iPhone used by one of the shooters in the San … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYTimes: FBI may not need Apple to unlock San Bernardino shooter’s iPhone

Reason.com: SCOTUS Declines Opportunity to Limit Random Border Patrol Stops

Reason.com: SCOTUS Declines Opportunity to Limit Random Border Patrol Stops by Jacob Sullum: The Court’s decision leaves motorists vulnerable to the whims of armed government agents who can stop them at will.

Posted in Border search | Comments Off on Reason.com: SCOTUS Declines Opportunity to Limit Random Border Patrol Stops

W.D.La.: That defendant was “staying” at a residence satisfies Payton’s “reason to believe” requirement

That defendant was “staying” at a residence satisfies Payton’s “reason to believe” requirement he’s residing there. United States v. Washington, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176979 (W.D.La. Nov. 18, 2015), adopted 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35051 (W.D. La. Mar. 16, 2016):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on W.D.La.: That defendant was “staying” at a residence satisfies Payton’s “reason to believe” requirement

OK: Officer could approach parked motorist on closed business parking lot after hours for welfare check

Defendant was standing next to his motorcycle on a closed business parking lot, across the street from a casino, in the early morning hours. The officer approached him to inquire. Defendant said he was “taking a break.” The officer asked … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Inventory | Comments Off on OK: Officer could approach parked motorist on closed business parking lot after hours for welfare check

CNN: FBI may have found a way into terrorist’s iPhone

CNN: FBI may have found a way into terrorist’s iPhone by Jackie Wattles: On the eve of a court showdown with Apple, the Department of Justice wants to cancel the hearing, saying it may have found a way into the … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on CNN: FBI may have found a way into terrorist’s iPhone

TN: Curtilage doesn’t extend to neighborhood’s gate

Defendant lived in a partially gated community, but that didn’t mean that officers couldn’t enter through a gate that was usually open during the day. In the parking lot was defendant’s car and in plain view was property that obviously … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage | Comments Off on TN: Curtilage doesn’t extend to neighborhood’s gate

NC reverses two for no findings contrary to Grady v. NC on GPS monitoring sex offenders

The trial court failed to follow the dictates of Grady v. North Carolina that satellite based monitoring of sex offenders is a search subject to the reasonableness clause. The summary conclusion it was reasonable is rejected; remanded. State v. Blue, … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on NC reverses two for no findings contrary to Grady v. NC on GPS monitoring sex offenders

Why we’ve been down: too much traffic for space we rented

We’ve been down a few times in the last ten days, usually for a few hours at a time. Then, nearly all day Saturday. Frustrating to be down at all. Apparent reason: heavier traffic than we allowed for and paid … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Why we’ve been down: too much traffic for space we rented

CA3: Entry for arrest was virtual hot pursuit; door opened on knock

An off-duty officer witnessed a robbery at a 7-Eleven at 4:30 am and followed the masked man out on the street where the mask was removed, and he got a look at the robber’s face. He followed to a duplex … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA3: Entry for arrest was virtual hot pursuit; door opened on knock

CA7: The rubric of “consent once removed” needs to be jettisoned as meaningless, but entry still valid by exigency

The rubric of “consent once removed” needs to be jettisoned as meaningless. Here, there was real exigency after the informant’s entry into a potentially dangerous situation with the undercover officers watching, and that was sufficient to justify the entry without … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA7: The rubric of “consent once removed” needs to be jettisoned as meaningless, but entry still valid by exigency

M.D.La.: “Provoked” flight different than “unprovoked” flight; def could ignore officer and run away where no RS

Officers had no reasonable suspicion to stop defendant in a high crime area, even after he fled from them when they told him to stop. This was “provoked” flight, contrary to Wardlow’s “unprovoked” flight. “When a vehicle approaches someone in … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.La.: “Provoked” flight different than “unprovoked” flight; def could ignore officer and run away where no RS

D.Nev.: On Franks challenge, officer credited that the time stamp on digital pictures was just erroneous

The Franks issues did not rise to materiality. The officer was credible that the time stamp on the digital photograph showed the picture taken before the search rather than after was an error on the camera because he didn’t check … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Nev.: On Franks challenge, officer credited that the time stamp on digital pictures was just erroneous

S.D.N.Y.: Amtrak officers are “railroad police” under New York law and subject to § 1983

Amtrak police are “railroad police” under New York law, and they are subject to § 1983. (Fourth Amendment claim dismissed; other claims survive.) Chunn v. Amtrak, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176987 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 6, 2015), adopted 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Amtrak officers are “railroad police” under New York law and subject to § 1983

TX1: Def carries burden of proof on standing; a mere footnote in a motion to suppress wasn’t enough

As a passenger, defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in computers found in the car because he did not attempt to prove they were his. The motion to suppress said they were his but he put on no proof. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Standing | Comments Off on TX1: Def carries burden of proof on standing; a mere footnote in a motion to suppress wasn’t enough