Author Archives: Hall

NY3: Fight in one room didn’t justify protective sweep of back rooms

Police responded to a disturbance call and heard a fight going on inside. The door was unlocked and they entered. They separated the combatants, and then the wife of the non-aggressor entered the room and sat down, too. They decided … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep | Comments Off on NY3: Fight in one room didn’t justify protective sweep of back rooms

CA5: Pre-Jardines dog sniff at garage was valid at time under case law; GFE applies

The good faith exception applied to validate dog sniffs based on law at the time saying that a sniff at defendant’s garage wasn’t an invasion of the curtilage back then. The search was 2008 and Jardines was 2013. The deterrent … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA5: Pre-Jardines dog sniff at garage was valid at time under case law; GFE applies

W.D.Mo.: Officers’ own observations corroborated CI’s

There clearly was probable cause drugs, money, and firearms would be found at the place searched. “The affidavit provided the statements of a confidential source who specifically described drug trafficking activities there. These statements included the CS’s very recent eyewitness … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Officers’ own observations corroborated CI’s

W.D.Tenn.: Apt complex private security detained and searched def for trespass, and it was a private search

Defendant was in a friend’s apartment smoking pot when the complex’s security guards came to a noise complaint. Defendant was on a no-trespassing list and he was handcuffed and searched. Defendant had no standing in the pot in the apartment. … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Private search | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Apt complex private security detained and searched def for trespass, and it was a private search

N.D.Ohio: Nexus to house shown by controlled buys

“[T]he affidavit only needs to show a ‘nexus’ between the place to be searched and the evidence sought. [¶] A common-sense reading of the affidavit leads to the conclusion that there is a nexus between the residence and the evidence … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Nexus to house shown by controlled buys

E.D.Cal.: Dashcam video showed officer slow walked the citation to add time for the drug dog; no RS for the delay

It was apparent from the video that the officer slow walked the citation to give more time to the drug dog to get there and do its job. Selective muting of the audio at the time by the officer also … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Dashcam video showed officer slow walked the citation to add time for the drug dog; no RS for the delay

New American: New Illinois Law Nullifies Expansion of Surveillance State

New American: New Illinois Law Nullifies Expansion of Surveillance State by Joe Wolverton, II: A new law in Illinois works to protect citizens of that state from being subjected to electronic surveillance that violates their right to be free from … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site simulators, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on New American: New Illinois Law Nullifies Expansion of Surveillance State

E.D.Tex.: No REP in a cell phone call made in back of patrol car caught on dashcam

Defendant’s stop was valid, and so was the ultimate inventory of the car under Bertine. Defendant was in the back of a police car, and he called his grandfather and the audio was picked up on the dashcam video where … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: No REP in a cell phone call made in back of patrol car caught on dashcam

MO: Where there’s PC to believe evidence is in a vehicle, it may be seized to remove it for search

When there is probable cause to believe a vehicle contains criminal evidence, exigent circumstances can support its seizure pending determination whether to search it under the automobile exception or to remove it to a secure location for search. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on MO: Where there’s PC to believe evidence is in a vehicle, it may be seized to remove it for search

D.Ore.: No territorial limitation for SW to Facebook under § 2703

“The territorial limitation in Rule 41 … does not limit warrants issued pursuant to [18 U.S.C.] § 2703.” A search warrant for Facebook in another jurisdiction was valid. United States v. Bundy, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94476 (D.Ore. July 20, … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Computer and cloud searches, F.R.Crim.P. 41 | Comments Off on D.Ore.: No territorial limitation for SW to Facebook under § 2703

E.D.N.C.: Losing sight of the def for a few minutes didn’t dissipate the RS

The officer had reasonable suspicion on the totality, and it doesn’t dissipate just because the officer lost sight of defendant for a little while. United States v. Williams, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94514 (E.D.N.C. June 2, 2016),* adopted, 2016 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Losing sight of the def for a few minutes didn’t dissipate the RS

E.D.Mich.: Detailed tip about def coupled with seeing bulge of a gun was RS

Aside from the detailed tip the police had about defendant, the officer saw the bulge of a gun, and that was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Bridges, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95367 (E.D.Mich. July 21, 2016).* Defendant’s patdown at the … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Detailed tip about def coupled with seeing bulge of a gun was RS

S.D.Ga.: Motion to suppress wasn’t timely and discovery wasn’t that complicated; but he’d lose on standing or merits anyway

Defendant’s motion to suppress wasn’t timely, and he had plenty of time to get it filed and didn’t give an excuse or even mention it being late. “Large volumes of discovery can indeed constitute good cause for addressing a motion’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Motion to suppress wasn’t timely and discovery wasn’t that complicated; but he’d lose on standing or merits anyway

S.D.Ga.: Search issue mentioned in passing and not fleshed out is waived

“The felony probation-violation arrest warrant alone was all the police needed to arrest James at any time, so his warrantless seizure argument is simply frivolous.” Another argument mentioned in passing is treated as waived for failure to flesh it out. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Search issue mentioned in passing and not fleshed out is waived

Miami Herald: He was arrested for meth, but the crumbs in his car were Krispy Kreme doughnut glaze

Miami Herald: He was arrested for meth, but the crumbs in his car were Krispy Kreme doughnut glaze by Alex Harris: Daniel Rushing was arrested, charged with possession with a weapon, strip-searched and jailed in December. The 64-year-old Orlando man … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Miami Herald: He was arrested for meth, but the crumbs in his car were Krispy Kreme doughnut glaze

New Law Review Article: Protecting the Fourth Amendment in the Information Age: A Response to Robert Litt

New Law Review Article: Protecting the Fourth Amendment in the Information Age: A Response to Robert Litt by Cindy Cohn (short form here without footnotes)

Posted in National security, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on New Law Review Article: Protecting the Fourth Amendment in the Information Age: A Response to Robert Litt

C.D.Cal.: Purging an invalid consent search from the affidavit for SW, the remainder shows no PC, so search suppressed

The testimony of the defendants on consent was consistent, detailed, and credible, but the testimony of the officers was vague. Thus, the consent is found invalid. Since the consent search made it into the affidavit for the search warrant, it … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Purging an invalid consent search from the affidavit for SW, the remainder shows no PC, so search suppressed

M.D.Ala.: Def didn’t show standing but gov’t didn’t raise it, so it’s waived

The court finds on the face of the pleadings that one defendant had no standing to contest the search but goes to the merits because the government failed to assert standing. United States v. Pierce, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93614 … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Def didn’t show standing but gov’t didn’t raise it, so it’s waived

CA8: Car in abandoned car wash bay in high crime area in middle of night occupied by a known criminal was RS

The officer here came upon a car parked in an empty car wash bay in the middle of the night in a high crime area. When he saw and recognized defendant, to him a known criminal, he had reasonable suspicion … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Car in abandoned car wash bay in high crime area in middle of night occupied by a known criminal was RS

CA8: Record supports consent because that’s all district court had

Defendant put a backpack in the shed of Allen, and Allen told the police he didn’t put a lock on the shed and consented to cutting it off and the entry. An officer testified that defendant consented too, and defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on CA8: Record supports consent because that’s all district court had