Author Archives: Hall

The Hill: Congress must restore 4th Amendment protections for email privacy

The Hill: Congress must restore 4th Amendment protections for email privacy by Brian McNicoll: Additionally, unfettered access to private emails does not seem to comport with the Fourth Amendment protections against search and seizure without a duly sworn warrant. Congress … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail | Comments Off on The Hill: Congress must restore 4th Amendment protections for email privacy

Police One: What cops need to know about TASER use, the Fourth Amendment and excessive use of force

Police One: What cops need to know about TASER use, the Fourth Amendment and excessive use of force by Mike Callahan By analyzing case law, we can glean constitutional guidance concerning when the use of a TASER is lawfully appropriate … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on Police One: What cops need to know about TASER use, the Fourth Amendment and excessive use of force

EFF Asks Massachusetts High Court to Require Clear Limits Before Allowing Searches of Digital Devices and Information

EFF Asks Massachusetts High Court to Require Clear Limits Before Allowing Searches of Digital Devices and Information by Stephanie Lacambra: Along with several other advocacy groups, EFF signed on to an amicus brief this week in the case of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on EFF Asks Massachusetts High Court to Require Clear Limits Before Allowing Searches of Digital Devices and Information

W.D.La.: Deciding against def after remand on suppression motion on different ground didn’t violate mandate

On remand from reversal of denial of defendant’s suppression motion, the court analyzed the evidence anew, albeit from a different perspective, and it denies the motion to suppress on different grounds. This does not violate the Fifth Circuit’s mandate. Defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Deciding against def after remand on suppression motion on different ground didn’t violate mandate

Reason: Majority of States Lack Transparency on Asset Forfeiture

Reason: Majority of States Lack Transparency on Asset Forfeiture by C.J. Ciaramella: Want to know how much stuff police are seizing from people and where all that money goes? Good luck. Asset forfeiture programs in the majority of states across … Continue reading →

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on Reason: Majority of States Lack Transparency on Asset Forfeiture

E.D.Mich.: Mixed motive for otherwise valid inventory doesn’t make it unreasonable

A mixed motive for an inventory search doesn’t make it unreasonable as long as the inventory was reasonable. United States v. Dowl, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7184 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 19, 2017):

Posted in Inventory, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Mixed motive for otherwise valid inventory doesn’t make it unreasonable

OH3: CI invited in could record def in home

It does not violate the Fourth Amendment for a CI invited into defendant’s house for a drug deal to surreptitiously video record it. State v. Valdez, 2017-Ohio-241, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 242 (3d Dist. Jan. 23, 2017). Defendant claims he … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OH3: CI invited in could record def in home

UT: Def counsel failed to provide effective assistance in getting 4A issue before court for resolution

Defense counsel failed to adequately defend the accused on his motion to suppress by not briefing and failing to get it before the court for a hearing, essentially abandoning the client. The issue was left cloudy enough in the record … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on UT: Def counsel failed to provide effective assistance in getting 4A issue before court for resolution

MA: Anonymous tip only corroborated on obvious details not sufficient

The state failed to corroborate at all the basis of knowledge or reliability of the anonymous source. The described car showing up at the appointed time isn’t enough. Commonwealth v. Pinto, 2017 Mass. LEXIS 21 (Jan. 23, 2017):

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on MA: Anonymous tip only corroborated on obvious details not sufficient

MD: Even with MJ decrim, smell of pot in car is PC

Despite decriminalization of less than 10g of marijuana, the officer here had probable cause to search vehicle where he detects odor of marijuana emanating from vehicle, as marijuana in any amount remains contraband, notwithstanding decriminalization of possession of less than … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on MD: Even with MJ decrim, smell of pot in car is PC

IN: Smell of meth was PC, aside from knowledge of purchase of precursors

Officers knew that defendant had bought precursors to make methamphetamine, and that they were likely in his car. There was enough information for probable cause for a search of the car, independent of what the officers smelled. The appellate argument … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on IN: Smell of meth was PC, aside from knowledge of purchase of precursors

OR: Detention at gunpoint wasn’t attenuated from statement

Defendant’s stop and detention was with a show of force, and his statement wasn’t attenuated from his de facto arrest. Suppression order affirmed. State v. Pichardo, 360 Ore. 754 (Jan. 20, 2017), aff’g 275 Ore. App. 49, 364 P.3d 1 … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Attenuation | Comments Off on OR: Detention at gunpoint wasn’t attenuated from statement

Dallas News: The FBI ran a child porn site to catch predators, and now the accused are crying foul

Dallas News: The FBI ran a child porn site to catch predators, and now the accused are crying foul by Kevin Krause: When Daryl Glenn Pawlak logged into a large child pornography website and downloaded images using his work computer, … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on Dallas News: The FBI ran a child porn site to catch predators, and now the accused are crying foul

EFF: When the Law Stands in the Way of Tech Companies Standing Up for Their Users

EFF: When the Law Stands in the Way of Tech Companies Standing Up for Their Users by Andrew Crocker: It’s no secret online service providers hold tons of sensitive data about their customers, which is why EFF calls on companies … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail | Comments Off on EFF: When the Law Stands in the Way of Tech Companies Standing Up for Their Users

Bloomberg: Microsoft Asserts Clients’ Rights in FBI E-Mail Searches Fight

Bloomberg: Microsoft Asserts Clients’ Rights in FBI E-Mail Searches Fight by Kartikay Mehrotra: –First hurdle is convincing judge it can sue on their behalf –Tech industry says future of mobile, cloud computing at stake

Posted in E-mail, Standing | Comments Off on Bloomberg: Microsoft Asserts Clients’ Rights in FBI E-Mail Searches Fight

MN: 5A not violated by order to use fingerprint to open cell phone for search

Defendant’s cell phone was properly seized, and the order compelling him to provide his fingerprint to unlock the phone didn’t violate his privilege against self-incrimination because there was nothing testimonial about it. State v. Diamond, 2017 Minn. App. LEXIS 9 … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on MN: 5A not violated by order to use fingerprint to open cell phone for search

KY: Blood and debris trail to def’s open door and his refusal to talk about who was inside or what happened justified entry

Exigent circumstances justified the officers’ entry into defendant’s home. There was a blood trail that did not go all the way back to his apartment, but there was a debris trail, too, he was badly hurt and bleeding, and he … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on KY: Blood and debris trail to def’s open door and his refusal to talk about who was inside or what happened justified entry

NY2: Search of house for weapon after protective sweep was unreasonable

Defendant was reported to have assaulted people outside his house with a small bat and a brandishing a firearm. Police arrived, and he ran inside. Police kicked the door in, secured him, cleared the house [a protective sweep] putting the … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Protective sweep | Comments Off on NY2: Search of house for weapon after protective sweep was unreasonable

Cert.granted: District of Columbia v. Wesby on qualified immunity

Cert.granted: District of Columbia v. Wesby, 15-1485 (Jan. 19, 2017). Issues: (1) Whether police officers who found late-night partiers inside a vacant home belonging to someone else had probable cause to arrest the partiers for trespassing under the Fourth Amendment, … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Cert.granted: District of Columbia v. Wesby on qualified immunity

CA6: Franks challenges subject to clearly erroneous standard of review; here, materiality not shown

The District Court’s findings under Franks are subject to the clear error standard of review. Here, the officer learned a new fact between the wiretap application and the search warrant application, and there is some surface appeal to apply Franks. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA6: Franks challenges subject to clearly erroneous standard of review; here, materiality not shown