Author Archives: Hall

W.D.Va.: Misstatement of crack v. powder cocaine wasn’t Franks violation

In a 2255 case, it wasn’t ineffective assistance for defense counsel to fail to make a Franks challenge to a misstatement of crack v. powder cocaine in a search warrant application. United States v. Moyer, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79279 … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: Misstatement of crack v. powder cocaine wasn’t Franks violation

S.D.Tex.: Immigration stop was extended with RS

Extending an immigration stop: “The Court finds that Agent Gonzalez’s questions related to Garcia’s citizenship, documents proving citizenship, and his travel plans and thus were within the scope of an immigration stop. Further, the Court finds that the questioning was … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Immigration checkpoints | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Immigration stop was extended with RS

D.P.R.: Parents lacked apparent authority to consent to adult child’s room

The government failed to prove common authority by the consenter, defendant’s mother, for a search of the adult defendant’s separate bedroom. Common authority is far more readily found when the child is a minor, but not when the child is … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Parents lacked apparent authority to consent to adult child’s room

IA: While Iowa doesn’t recognize anticipatory warrants by statute, a federal anticipatory SW that ended up in state court was valid

“The defendant now appeals, arguing among other things that Iowa’s search warrant statutes do not authorize anticipatory warrants. We agree, but hold that where the federal government conducts a search pursuant to a valid federal search warrant for purposes of … Continue reading →

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Conflict of laws | Comments Off on IA: While Iowa doesn’t recognize anticipatory warrants by statute, a federal anticipatory SW that ended up in state court was valid

FISA judge finds five years of illegal surveillance of some U.S. persons, but it wasn’t willful; remedial measures required; still, 4A not violated

McClatchy: Secret court rebukes NSA for 5-year illegal surveillance of U.S. citizens by Tim Johnson: U.S. intelligence agencies conducted illegal surveillance on American citizens over a five-year period, a practice that earned them a sharp rebuke from a secret court … Continue reading →

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on FISA judge finds five years of illegal surveillance of some U.S. persons, but it wasn’t willful; remedial measures required; still, 4A not violated

OH8: Citizen’s warning of sobriety checkpoints in Parma, Ohio was protected speech and not obstruction of governmental business

Defendant’s actions of having a sign and warning people of a sobriety checkpoint did not amount to obstruction of official business, so his arrest was unjustified. Ohio practice requires the police to warn of sobriety checkpoints, too. City of Parma … Continue reading →

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH8: Citizen’s warning of sobriety checkpoints in Parma, Ohio was protected speech and not obstruction of governmental business

FL4: Just being on somebody else’s property is not RS of a crime without more; telling def to “stand by” is a seizure

Defendant’s friends saw a police officer coming and all walked away. Defendant did not. That did not mean that when the encounter started, defendant was free to leave. On this record, he was not, and it was a detention without … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on FL4: Just being on somebody else’s property is not RS of a crime without more; telling def to “stand by” is a seizure

S.D.Iowa: Stepping aside and gesturing for officer to enter house was consent to enter

Defendant consented to police entry by stepping aside and gesturing for police to enter. United States v. Faler, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188840 (S.D. Iowa April 28, 2015).* During a traffic stop, defendant was the passenger, and he was fidgety. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on S.D.Iowa: Stepping aside and gesturing for officer to enter house was consent to enter

E.D.Mich.: Undercover officers entering public areas of a strip club as customers not a search

First undercover officers and then other officers entered plaintiff’s strip club to investigate alleged misdeeds inside. No warrant was needed under Macon because the parts of the club entered by the officers were open to the customers. ABECE Operating v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Undercover officers entering public areas of a strip club as customers not a search

NYTimes: Body Cameras, Long Distrusted, Now Help Show ‘Human Side of the Badge’

NYTimes: Body Cameras, Long Distrusted, Now Help Show ‘Human Side of the Badge’ by Julie Bosman: Law enforcement’s use of body-worn cameras has expanded around the country, largely in response to high-profile civilian deaths at the hands of officers and … Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on NYTimes: Body Cameras, Long Distrusted, Now Help Show ‘Human Side of the Badge’

CA8: A 1 in 11 chance homeowner had CP on computer was enough for qualified immunity; search turned up nothing and he lost job then home

Child pornography was able to be downloaded from plaintiff’s IP address, so Minot police got a search warrant for plaintiff’s address, which appeared to be a single family dwelling. When they got there, however, they learned that 11 people lived … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Computer and cloud searches, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: A 1 in 11 chance homeowner had CP on computer was enough for qualified immunity; search turned up nothing and he lost job then home

A.F.Ct.Crim.App.: Request for phone password after signed consent to search phone after Miranda warning not interrogation

Defendant had consented to a search of his cell phone in writing. He’d been Mirandized and then was asked for the passcode, which he gave. The request (not an order) for the passcode, was not an interrogation. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on A.F.Ct.Crim.App.: Request for phone password after signed consent to search phone after Miranda warning not interrogation

MA: Transfer of gun on the street was RS

Transfer of a gun on the street which appeared to be prearranged suggested criminal activity, and thus was reasonable suspicion. Commonwealth v. Suriel, 2017 Mass. App. LEXIS 73 (May 26, 2017). (This is Massachusetts. In an open carry state, this … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MA: Transfer of gun on the street was RS

E.D.Wis.: Gov’t didn’t show abandonment of package by sender because of error in address where recipient refused it

The USPS Postal Inspector did not act reasonably in determining that the package with methamphetamine was abandoned. The recipient disclaimed any interest in it, and the investigation into the sender, who would still have an interest in it, was woefully … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Burden of proof | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Gov’t didn’t show abandonment of package by sender because of error in address where recipient refused it

MI: Taking ptf’s photo and prints after a valid arrest did not violate 4A

The taking of plaintiff’s photograph and fingerprints after an apparently valid arrest was not a clearly established violation of the Fourth Amendment where he was innocent of a crime. Plaintiff did not contest his arrest, but he contended that the … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on MI: Taking ptf’s photo and prints after a valid arrest did not violate 4A

CA10: 4A claim not stated for malicious prosecution where no arrest

Plaintiff couldn’t state a Fourth Amendment claim for malicious prosecution where she was not arrested by the officer. He presented his findings to the prosecutor who filed a charge. Fisher v. Koopman, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8940 (10th Cir. May … Continue reading →

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on CA10: 4A claim not stated for malicious prosecution where no arrest

E.D.Va.: There is no higher nexus requirement involving cell phone data and tracking

There is no higher nexus requirement involving cell phones. A ping order of a cell phone may be used to collect “mere evidence,” rejecting United States v. Powell, 943 F. Supp. 2d 759 (E.D. Mich. 2013). United States v. Christian, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, GPS / Tracking Data, Nexus | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: There is no higher nexus requirement involving cell phone data and tracking

LA2: UT blanket probation search condition applied to probationer transferred to LA

Defendant was on probation out of Utah and supervised in Louisiana. His PO received information that he might have child pornography on his cell phone. During a PO visit, he was told to get his cell phone and computer out … Continue reading →

Posted in Conflict of laws, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on LA2: UT blanket probation search condition applied to probationer transferred to LA

OH6: Merely being “associated” with a vehicle doesn’t confer standing

“In his motion to suppress, he asserted only that he was ‘associated’ with the truck. We find an ‘association’ with the vehicle gives no greater rights than a mere passenger. Therefore, we agree with the state that appellant could not … Continue reading →

Posted in Standards of review, Standing | Comments Off on OH6: Merely being “associated” with a vehicle doesn’t confer standing

IN: Stop was reasonably extended because the LPN didn’t match vehicle

A stop was reasonably extended by the officer because the LPN didn’t come back to the vehicle. Browder v. State, 2017 Ind. App. LEXIS 212 (May 22, 2017).* The affidavit for search warrant was not bare bones, and the search … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on IN: Stop was reasonably extended because the LPN didn’t match vehicle