Author Archives: Hall

EFF: Sen. Feinstein Supports “Backdoor” Warrants, So Why Don’t Reps. Nunes and Schiff?

EFF: Sen. Feinstein Supports “Backdoor” Warrants, So Why Don’t Reps. Nunes and Schiff? by David Ruiz: As the deadline for renewing and reforming key portions of the NSA’s spying apparatus looms less than two months away, two of the most … Continue reading →

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on EFF: Sen. Feinstein Supports “Backdoor” Warrants, So Why Don’t Reps. Nunes and Schiff?

ID: Trial court suppressed forced catheterization of OUI suspect in hospital (not an issue on appeal)

The trial court suppressed a forced catheterization of defendant in her OUI case as exceeding her consent. It wasn’t clear whether it was for law enforcement or medical purposes. This wasn’t an issue on appeal (for good reason because it … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches | Comments Off on ID: Trial court suppressed forced catheterization of OUI suspect in hospital (not an issue on appeal)

OR: Def bystander to a school shooting scene wasn’t subject to a frisk: no RS or other exception applies from refusal to make eye contact with officer

Defendant heard there was a shooting at a high school his sister attended, so he armed himself and went down there. The students coming out were frisked to make sure that any shooter did not escape with the students. Defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: Def bystander to a school shooting scene wasn’t subject to a frisk: no RS or other exception applies from refusal to make eye contact with officer

CA9: Def’s wife was a private actor turning over his hard drive to the police

Defendant’s wife was not acting as an agent of the government when she turned over his hard drive to the police. The search warrant they obtained was clearly issued on probable cause. United States v. Wolff, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Private search | Comments Off on CA9: Def’s wife was a private actor turning over his hard drive to the police

D.S.D.: Was all this a “reasonable” mistake under Heien? Doesn’t matter because there was RS for other reasons

The court goes on at length about the reasonableness of the officers’ interpretation of use of a turn signal and the application of the state “practicable lane” statute under the reasonableness standard of Heien, then concludes there was reasonable suspicion … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Was all this a “reasonable” mistake under Heien? Doesn’t matter because there was RS for other reasons

N.D.Cal.: Suspicionless probation search condition not shown to be on defendant; motion to suppress granted

Defendant did not have a suspicionless search condition on him. “This Court now joins the other courts in this district that have held that an officer must have reasonable suspicion to conduct a search of a probationer, unless the probationer … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Suspicionless probation search condition not shown to be on defendant; motion to suppress granted

HI: Moving to suppress seizure of pill bottle incident to arrest didn’t cover later search of the bottle; issue waived

Defendant’s challenge to removal of a pill bottle from his person did not preserve a challenge to search of the pill bottle at the police station. “In any event, we conclude that Sado’s argument on appeal is without merit. Officer … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on HI: Moving to suppress seizure of pill bottle incident to arrest didn’t cover later search of the bottle; issue waived

E.D.Pa.: Def’s car could have been searched under auto. exception but police got a SW and took 8 days to search; not unreasonable under the circumstances

Defendant’s car was seized with probable cause for involvement in a series of bank robberies, and it could have been searched without a warrant under the automobile exception. The police got a search warrant instead and took eight days to … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Def’s car could have been searched under auto. exception but police got a SW and took 8 days to search; not unreasonable under the circumstances

Techdirt: Oversight Board Report On DC Police Cameras Contradicts Earlier Report’s Claims

Techdirt: Oversight Board Report On DC Police Cameras Contradicts Earlier Report’s Claims by Tim Cushing: Less than a month after a first report was delivered on Washington, DC police body camera use, a second one has arrived. And it seems … Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on Techdirt: Oversight Board Report On DC Police Cameras Contradicts Earlier Report’s Claims

D.Nev.: PC for automobile exception continues into impoundment

Probable cause for a vehicle search under the automobile exception continues into impoundment for later inventory even though the vehicle is immobilized by where it is. Also, permission from the owner gives the driver of a car standing. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Inventory | Comments Off on D.Nev.: PC for automobile exception continues into impoundment

C.D.Ill.: Ins. co. has standing to sue that audit would be 4A violation, and its claim is ripe. Motion to dismiss denied.

An insurance company subject to government audit has standing to challenge the legal basis for the audit. Its Fourth Amendment claim is ripe: “Fidelity’s Fourth Amendment claim in Count 1 presents a purely legal question, which renders the claim fit … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Ins. co. has standing to sue that audit would be 4A violation, and its claim is ripe. Motion to dismiss denied.

WA: Appeal should have been from dismissal after granted suppression order; appeal dismissed

State couldn’t appeal a suppression order after it moves to dismiss a case. It should have appealed the dismissal order or both. State v. Cruz, 2017 Wash. LEXIS 997 (Nov. 2, 2017). Dropping a coat with a gun in the … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Uncategorized | Comments Off on WA: Appeal should have been from dismissal after granted suppression order; appeal dismissed

CA6: “Pill mill” employee was a snitch who let in undercover DEA agent as a patient; this was consent to enter and assumption of risk

The defendant was suspected of running a “pill mill.” A nurse practitioner worked for the clinic and was feeding information to the DEA as well as engaging in illegal acts, too. The DEA got the nurse to let an undercover … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent | Comments Off on CA6: “Pill mill” employee was a snitch who let in undercover DEA agent as a patient; this was consent to enter and assumption of risk

Fairfaxtimes.com: Is your refrigerator dropping a dime on you?

Fairfaxtimes.com: Is your refrigerator dropping a dime on you? Letter to the editor on the surveillance life of home appliances.

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Fairfaxtimes.com: Is your refrigerator dropping a dime on you?

CA6: No reasonable officer could conclude there was PC for pft’s arrest

“When reviewing the information known to Seidl at the time of Zavatson’s arrest, we conclude that no reasonable officer could have believed, based on anything more than speculation, that Zavatson had committed the purported theft. As an initial matter, there … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: No reasonable officer could conclude there was PC for pft’s arrest

CA6: Ptf’s guilty plea after losing suppression motion wasn’t collateral estoppel to § 1983 and Heck not implicated

Plaintiff sued over his body cavity search that was part of his state case. He litigated and lost in state trial court then pled guilty. His federal action does not implicate his conviction, and it can proceed under Heck v. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA6: Ptf’s guilty plea after losing suppression motion wasn’t collateral estoppel to § 1983 and Heck not implicated

D.Me.: Officer’s comments and actions on body recorder belie any need for protective sweep

Officers went to defendant’s mobile home on a knock-and-talk based on an attempt to buy a gun two weeks earlier that was denied because the address given didn’t match the driver’s license. At the door of the mobile home, the … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.Me.: Officer’s comments and actions on body recorder belie any need for protective sweep

New American: Did Mueller’s Search of Manafort’s Home Violate the Fourth Amendment?

New American: Did Mueller’s Search of Manafort’s Home Violate the Fourth Amendment? by C. Mitchell Shaw:

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on New American: Did Mueller’s Search of Manafort’s Home Violate the Fourth Amendment?

CA5: Witness to police shooting handcuffed and detained for 2 hours stated 4A claim for relief

Plaintiff’s father was acting erratic and was armed, and the police were called. Plaintiff was trying to defuse the situation. The SWAT team showed up, and, after a brief stand-off plaintiff’s father was shot while she was standing next to … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on CA5: Witness to police shooting handcuffed and detained for 2 hours stated 4A claim for relief

CA10: Defs did not violate clearly established 4A law by accessing the Utah Controlled Substance Database on plaintiffs’ prescriptions

Defendants did not violate clearly established Fourth Amendment law by accessing the Utah Controlled Substance Database on plaintiffs’ prescriptions (and the Fourth Amendment claim goes undecided). Pyle v. Woods, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 21713 (10th Cir. Nov. 1, 2017):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Administrative search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Defs did not violate clearly established 4A law by accessing the Utah Controlled Substance Database on plaintiffs’ prescriptions