D.N.D.: PC shown for SW for drug trafficker’s car’s GPS

The search warrant for defendant’s vehicle’s GPS system used in his indictment for drug trafficking was based on probable cause. It also tracked the language of his cell phone warrant. United States v. Haymon, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24462 (D.N.D. Feb. 5, 2026).

“[P]resuming the truth of all Reeves’s well-pleaded assertions of fact, a reasonable jury could conclude that this was a circumstance where little to no force was warranted to effectuate Reeves’s arrest and that the arresting officers used excessive force when they ‘slammed’ him against a wall, as well as when they continued to cuff Reeves behind his back despite his complaints of pain and his alerting the officers that doing so exacerbated Reeves’s previous injuries. Defendants’ motion to dismiss the federal and state excessive force claims is denied.” Reeves v. City of N.Y., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24375 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 5, 2026).*

Franks challenge fails over omissions. “[T]he Court agrees with [Magistrate] Judge Senechal’s determination that, even if Officer Gossen had included the omitted information in his declaration, the reviewing judge may still have found probable cause for the warrant.” United States v. Griffien, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24464 (D.N.D. Feb. 5, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Excessive force, GPS / Tracking Data. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.