CA6: No standing in a group chat SW of another person’s account

Defendant had no standing to challenge a group chat obtained by search warrant from a social media provider of another person’s account. (Defendants discussed a kidnapping over group chat.) United States v. Blake, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 3686 (6th Cir. Feb. 5, 2026).

Qualified immunity denied in this excessive force case. Issues remain for trial over whether gratuitous force was used against the plaintiff. Pears v. Franklin, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 3691 (11th Cir. Feb. 5, 2026).*

Plaintiff’s complaint against prosecutors for allegedly disclosing jail calls doesn’t state a claim here, plus there’s likely prosecutorial immunity. Tenace v. Pratt, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23131 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 3, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Prison and jail searches, Social media warrants, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.