D.S.C.: Alleged unauthorized officers executing SW under state law not a 4A violation

Plaintiff’s claim unauthorized officers executed the search warrant under state law isn’t a Fourth Amendment violation. Richard v. Jeffcoat, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1512 (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2026).

Based on the search warrant, “The government may not disclose [at trial] what was being searched for other than weapons, unless Staples opens the door to such items.” United States v. Staples, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1397 (D. Nev. Jan. 5, 2026).*

Officers broke in to defendant’s apartment when no one came to the door. Inside he was briefly handcuffed then unhandcuffed. He was told he was not under arrest and didn’t have to answer any questions. He mentioned “provoking a lawyer.” But, “Defendant’s conduct on the video is compelling evidence that his subsequent waiver was knowing. During this exchange with S.A. Chacon, Defendant pauses for approximately eight seconds and only then begins to talk to the agents about Jane Doe #1 and the case against him.” United States v. McLeod, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 269315 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 12, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Admissibility of evidence, Custody, Reasonableness, Warrant execution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.