Daily Archives: January 19, 2026

UT: State used SW to get defense expert’s computer data; ordered destroyed, but case not dismissed

The state used a search warrant to access the defense expert’s work product in a sex case. The court held hearings and found that the attorney-client work product was not accessed by the state but ordered the data product of … Continue reading

Posted in FISA, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on UT: State used SW to get defense expert’s computer data; ordered destroyed, but case not dismissed

E.D.Mo.: Refusal to promptly ID oneself justified handcuffing during brief investigative detention

Responding to a call, defendant fairly matched the description. When he would not identify himself, it was reasonable to handcuff him for a few minutes while it was sorted out. United States v. Troupe, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9010 (E.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Refusal to promptly ID oneself justified handcuffing during brief investigative detention

OH2: Dog handler’s testimony of dog certification was sufficient to show reliability

The dog handler’s testimony that the dog was certified before this sniff was sufficient to show the dog was reliable. State v. Murphy, 2026-Ohio-143 (2d Dist. Jan. 13, 2026). Search warrants can be based on hearsay. Mendenhall v. City & … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Informant hearsay, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH2: Dog handler’s testimony of dog certification was sufficient to show reliability