Daily Archives: July 23, 2024

VA: “‘you got nothing in the car, right?’ did not prolong the stop”

“The trial court made a factual finding that Investigator Natiello’s question lasted the same amount of time that it would have taken to simply hand the documents back to Jones. In addition, the question occurred before the investigator addressed Jones’s … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on VA: “‘you got nothing in the car, right?’ did not prolong the stop”

S.D.N.Y.: Cell phone SW was “bare bones” on connection to the crime; no PC, no GFE

In this racketeering case, defendant admitted for purposes of the motion to suppress he was in the gang and that people engaged in violent acts. The government never showed probable cause to believe his cell phone had evidence of a … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Cell phone SW was “bare bones” on connection to the crime; no PC, no GFE

E.D.Mich.: Cell tower dump isn’t CSLI; doesn’t require PC, but just a court order

A cell tower dump isn’t CSLI, so actual probable cause isn’t required. Here, however, there was. In re United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128532 (E.D. Mich. July 18, 2024).* “Finally, the gratuitous physical aggression at the scene cannot be … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Custody, Voluntariness | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Cell tower dump isn’t CSLI; doesn’t require PC, but just a court order

E.D.La.: Fire dept. can compel fingerprinting of its firefighters

A fire department can compel production of fingerprints for timekeeping purposes from its firefighters under threat of termination. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in fingerprints. Perre v. E. Bank Consol. Special Serv. Fire Prot., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Fire dept. can compel fingerprinting of its firefighters

CA5: GFE first (was reliance objectively reasonable), PC second

“Warrants are reviewed under a two-part test. In the first step, we determine whether the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies. Under that exception, ‘evidence obtained from [a] search will not be excluded’ even if ‘probable cause for a … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: GFE first (was reliance objectively reasonable), PC second