Daily Archives: July 18, 2024

N.D.Cal.: No standing in ALPR info of car def didn’t drive

Defendant’s motion to suppress automated license plate reader (ALPR) data on the family car that he didn’t drive is denied for lack of standing. Also, the holder of the information was a third-party contractor. United States v. Butler, 2024 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing, Surveillance technology, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: No standing in ALPR info of car def didn’t drive

MT: RS def was too drunk to drive from description, allegedly crawling to car, then officer talking to him

The citizen informant’s defendant was too drunk to drive because he stumbled and crawled to his car was corroborated by observations and smelling him, so there was at least reasonable suspicion. Defendant’s claim that his bar receipt from inside the … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Private search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MT: RS def was too drunk to drive from description, allegedly crawling to car, then officer talking to him

D.Mass.: Passenger putting something under the seat shows no REP

A passenger putting something under the seat when in a car manifests no reasonable expectation of privacy and thus no standing. United States v. Dunnell, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124927 (D. Mass. July 16, 2024). (Apparently one needs to keep … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Passenger putting something under the seat shows no REP

CO: Drunk driving tip line report was not anonymous

A report through a drunk driving tip line was not anonymous. Even if it were, the officer developed reasonable suspicion before the stop. People v. Dacus, 2024 CO 51, 2024 Colo. LEXIS 565 (June 24, 2024).* Defendant’s arrest on a … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CO: Drunk driving tip line report was not anonymous

E.D.Pa.: Exposure to Covid-19 in prison doesn’t state a 4A or 8A claim

Exposure to Covid-19 in prison didn’t state a Fourth or Eighth Amendment claim. Dingle v. Tommage, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124710 (E.D. Pa. July 16, 2024). Defendant was driving with a suspended license, and WVSP protocol dictated impoundment of the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Inventory, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Exposure to Covid-19 in prison doesn’t state a 4A or 8A claim

D.Md.: Review of PC isn’t as skeptical as def requests

“Here, the affidavit easily meets the standard of probable cause. Defendants would require a level of skepticism that is not appropriate to the oversight at this juncture. The scheme to defraud was amply established by the affiant and so was … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on D.Md.: Review of PC isn’t as skeptical as def requests

NM: 19-day delay getting a SW for a computer was reasonable considering the diminished possessory interest in it

“The district court concluded, after weighing Defendant’s diminished possessory interest in the tablet and the legitimate interests of law enforcement, that under the circumstances, the nineteen-day delay between when the tablet was seized and when a search warrant was obtained … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Private search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on NM: 19-day delay getting a SW for a computer was reasonable considering the diminished possessory interest in it

Reason: Internet Preservation and the Fourth Amendment—Case Updates, Part I

Reason, The Volokh Conspiracy: Internet Preservation and the Fourth Amendment—Case Updates, Part I by Orin S. Kerr (“The first of two rulings, and why I find it unpersuasive.”):

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Social media warrants | Comments Off on Reason: Internet Preservation and the Fourth Amendment—Case Updates, Part I