Daily Archives: July 16, 2024

LA4: Being seen in a “drug hot spot” adds nothing to RS

Being seen in NOLA “drug hot spots” doesn’t add anything to reasonable suspicion. Suppression affirmed. State v. Tate, 2024 La. App. LEXIS 1107 (La. App. 4 Cir. July 11, 2024). The complainant’s telling the police of being drugged for sex … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA4: Being seen in a “drug hot spot” adds nothing to RS

CA2: Excessive force claims are new under Bivens and can’t be brought

Excessive force claims are new for Bivens, and rejected. Here, it was his restraint in a courtroom by US Marshals and CSOs. Edwards v. Gizzi, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 17100 (2d Cir. July 12, 2024). Plaintiff was shot in the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA2: Excessive force claims are new under Bivens and can’t be brought

TX10: Even if def’s CSLI was erroneously admitted at trial, it was harmless

Even if defendant’s CSLI was erroneously admitted at trial, it was harmless on this record. State v. Roberts, 2024 Tex. App. LEXIS 4847 (Tex. App. – Waco July 11, 2024). Leave to file a successor 2255 denied. The Fourth Amendment … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX10: Even if def’s CSLI was erroneously admitted at trial, it was harmless

CA11: No co-conspirator standing in two cars

Here there were two vehicles stopped. Defendant was a passenger in one, and he had no standing in either merely being a co-conspirator to a drug operation. United States v. Lewis, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 16803 (11th Cir. July 10, … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: No co-conspirator standing in two cars

E.D.N.C.: Military command authorized search for CP on electronics was valid; listing IP addresses of devices not required

Defendant was in the Marine Corps and a Command Authorized Search and Seizure (CASS) for his electronic devices was executed for child pornography. It was sufficiently particular to satisfy the Fourth Amendment. “In this case, the challenged warrant did not … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Military searches, Particularity, Pretext | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Military command authorized search for CP on electronics was valid; listing IP addresses of devices not required

D.P.R.: A cell phone found with drugs had its incriminating nature immediately apparent for plain view

A cell phone found with drugs had its incriminating nature immediately apparent for plain view. United States v. Fernandez-Santos, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121462 (D.P.R. July 8, 2024). In an illegal entry case, identification evidence allegedly illegally seized is not … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Exclusionary rule, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.P.R.: A cell phone found with drugs had its incriminating nature immediately apparent for plain view

MA: Kicking off shoes when police asked for them showed consent

Kicking off one’s sneakers when police asked for them was consent. Commonwealth v. Rodrigues, 2024 Mass. App. LEXIS 91 (July 11, 2024). This search warrant in a RICO case adequately showed probable cause for defendant’s cell phone. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MA: Kicking off shoes when police asked for them showed consent

NY3: SW for evidence of robbery (stolen property and mask) found def’s cell phone with image of him wearing the mask on its wallpaper

A search warrant in a robbery case looked for stolen property and the mask involved. When police executed the warrant, they found his cell phone with him wearing the mask as the wallpaper image on the phone. “We find without … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on NY3: SW for evidence of robbery (stolen property and mask) found def’s cell phone with image of him wearing the mask on its wallpaper

CA2: Failure to leave SW attachment at scene of search doesn’t void the search

That searching officers didn’t leave behind Attachment B to the warrant after the search didn’t void the search. United States v. Whaley, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 16819 (2d Cir. July 10, 2024). Collective knowledge here fails: “Based on the evidence … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA2: Failure to leave SW attachment at scene of search doesn’t void the search