Category Archives: Standards of review

D.Conn.: SW for drugs in house supported plain view of gun under mattress

There was evidence linking defendant’s alleged drug offenses to his home, so the warrant for his home was justified. A drug search is intensive, and the gun found under a mattress was in plain view. United States v. Reyes, 2017 … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Scope of search, Standards of review | Comments Off on D.Conn.: SW for drugs in house supported plain view of gun under mattress

ID: “Right result-wrong theory” will not be applied to relieve the state of defaulting an argument in support of search

“Right result-wrong theory” will not be applied to relieve the state of failing to make an argument to support the search in the trial court. The state defaulted the argument it advances on appeal. State v. Garcia-Rodriguez, 2017 Ida. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Standards of review | Comments Off on ID: “Right result-wrong theory” will not be applied to relieve the state of defaulting an argument in support of search

NH: After reversal on bad search, state free to argue alternative grounds

After the defendant got his conviction reversed on appeal for an unreasonable search, the state was free to make an alternative argument to sustain the search, and here it was independent source and inevitable discovery, which the court finds. Law … Continue reading

Posted in Standards of review | Comments Off on NH: After reversal on bad search, state free to argue alternative grounds

OK: Def counsel not constitutionally required to be notified of DNA SW after prosecution began

A search warrant was obtained for defendant’s DNA after he was represented. The affidavit showed probable cause, and there was no requirement to advise defense counsel of the search warrant before execution. Frederick v. State, 2017 OK CR 12, 2017 … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Standards of review, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OK: Def counsel not constitutionally required to be notified of DNA SW after prosecution began

OH6: Merely being “associated” with a vehicle doesn’t confer standing

“In his motion to suppress, he asserted only that he was ‘associated’ with the truck. We find an ‘association’ with the vehicle gives no greater rights than a mere passenger. Therefore, we agree with the state that appellant could not … Continue reading

Posted in Standards of review, Standing | Comments Off on OH6: Merely being “associated” with a vehicle doesn’t confer standing

WaPo: Is voluntariness of consent to search or seize a question of fact, law or both?

WaPo: Is voluntariness of consent to search or seize a question of fact, law or both? by Orin Kerr:

Posted in Consent, Standards of review | Comments Off on WaPo: Is voluntariness of consent to search or seize a question of fact, law or both?

MD: Issue on appeal more nuanced and different that one presented to the trial court

Defendant’s issue on appeal is more nuanced, yet not the same as the one argued before the trial court, so there is no authority to decide it. So, the court does for the sake of argument, and it finds nexus. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Standards of review | Comments Off on MD: Issue on appeal more nuanced and different that one presented to the trial court

VT: Entry into respondent’s land to investigate open fire was reasonable

Respondent was burning something on his open land without a burn permit. Firefighters were called, and they observed from the road that the color of the smoke indicated something other than natural wood was being burned. From their view, however, … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Standards of review | Comments Off on VT: Entry into respondent’s land to investigate open fire was reasonable

MD: Drug dog’s reliability is not subject to de novo appellate review

Whether a drug dog is reliable is a question committed to the trial court. It is not subject to de novo review on appeal. Grimm v. State, 2017 Md. App. LEXIS 413 (April 26, 2017). In this death case, there … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Standards of review | Comments Off on MD: Drug dog’s reliability is not subject to de novo appellate review

N.D.Iowa: Just because the officer had “unquestioned command of the situation” during a traffic stop doesn’t preclude conducting a frisk for weapons

Just because the officer had “unquestioned command of the situation” during a traffic stop doesn’t preclude the officer from conducting a frisk for weapons. Here, the stop was at night, in a high crime area, there were only streetlights, and … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Just because the officer had “unquestioned command of the situation” during a traffic stop doesn’t preclude conducting a frisk for weapons

TN: State’s failure to challenge trial court’s findings entry to curtilage was unreasonable is waiver

Officers had a levy for unpaid court costs, and it wasn’t uncommon for drug officers to come along for the seizure. The record supported the conclusion that defendant did not affirmatively and expressly disclaim or relinquish his privacy interest in … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Standards of review | Comments Off on TN: State’s failure to challenge trial court’s findings entry to curtilage was unreasonable is waiver

NY4: Testimony at trial can’t be used on appeal of a suppression issue

Even if defendant had standing, the search was justified by consent. “In contending that the resident did not give consent, defendant improperly relies on testimony of the resident of the home at the first trial, which ended in a hung … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on NY4: Testimony at trial can’t be used on appeal of a suppression issue

OH10: Bare bones findings didn’t support finding search was valid; remanded

The trial court’s bare bones findings were insufficient to support the conclusion that the search was valid. Remanded. State v. Edwards, 2016-Ohio-4771, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 5413 (10th Dist. June 30, 2016). Not challenging the Playpen warrant in this case … Continue reading

Posted in Standards of review | Comments Off on OH10: Bare bones findings didn’t support finding search was valid; remanded

KY: SW moots consent argument

Officers entered defendant’s home to secure a firearm and then returned with a search warrant. Defendant’s consent argument is moot. Lundy v. Commonwealth, 2017 Ky. App. LEXIS 22 (Jan. 27, 2017). The court properly overruled defendant’s motion to suppress a … Continue reading

Posted in Search incident, Standards of review, Standing | Comments Off on KY: SW moots consent argument

CA6: Without record references to where the facts are, the court finds the 4A argument waived; counsel blames word limits on briefs

Defendant had waived his challenge to the denial of motions to suppress where he failed to point to any findings in the record demonstrating how the district court erred or why a wiretap application lacked probable cause. Even if defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA6: Without record references to where the facts are, the court finds the 4A argument waived; counsel blames word limits on briefs

CA6: Franks challenges subject to clearly erroneous standard of review; here, materiality not shown

The District Court’s findings under Franks are subject to the clear error standard of review. Here, the officer learned a new fact between the wiretap application and the search warrant application, and there is some surface appeal to apply Franks. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA6: Franks challenges subject to clearly erroneous standard of review; here, materiality not shown

NC: Def waived issue of RS for appeal by arguing PC instead; on merits, there was RS anyway

Defendant abandons his argument that there was no reasonable suspicion for his stop by providing no argument on reasonable suspicion and instead focusing on probable cause. Going to the record, however, the court finds reasonable suspicion for the stop because … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on NC: Def waived issue of RS for appeal by arguing PC instead; on merits, there was RS anyway

AZ: Computer search warrants get greater scrutiny; this one lacked all particularity and no GFE applies

Computer search warrants get greater scrutiny. The search warrant for defendant’s computer lacked any particularity, and it could not be saved by the good faith exception. State v. Dean, 2017 Ariz. App. LEXIS 12 (Jan. 12, 2017):

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception, Standards of review | Comments Off on AZ: Computer search warrants get greater scrutiny; this one lacked all particularity and no GFE applies

OH11: Hot pursuit into a house after a misdemeanant reasonable

A man and a woman were walking in the middle of the road, and the woman was having difficulty standing up. This was a potential violation of statute, plus the officer had some possible concerns with the medical condition of … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Standards of review | Comments Off on OH11: Hot pursuit into a house after a misdemeanant reasonable

MN: Search was valid as a protective frisk even though it was raised for first time on appeal

The court of appeals adopts an alternative ground for a search raised for the first time on appeal finding the record sufficient to make a determination. Defendant was awakened on a couch, handcuffed, and frisked for a weapon. The state … Continue reading

Posted in Standards of review | Comments Off on MN: Search was valid as a protective frisk even though it was raised for first time on appeal