Category Archives: State constitution

AR: Investigating pot smell at motel, officers encountered man who reeked of marijuana; stop reasonable

Officers received a call from a motel complaining of the smell of marijuana. Walking up the stairs, they encountered defendant coming down the stairs who reeked of marijuana and stopped him, asked about marijuana, and he produced a bag from … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on AR: Investigating pot smell at motel, officers encountered man who reeked of marijuana; stop reasonable

D.Minn.: Just arrested snitch was corroborated enough to be believable for PC purposes

The CI was recently arrested in this investigation, and, while he had no track record, his tale was sufficiently corroborated by other information that had been developed to make him believable enough for probable cause. United States v. Arballo, 2015 … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Informant hearsay, State constitution | Tagged | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Just arrested snitch was corroborated enough to be believable for PC purposes

DE: SW execution in the community-living situation

Defendant lived in a house that several people shared, but it wasn’t apparent to the police who got the search warrant. There were no “barriers” on the inside, other than doors, that suggested separate living quarters, and the “do not … Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search, State constitution | Comments Off on DE: SW execution in the community-living situation

IN: Search of a pill bottle incident to an arrest for driving without a DL is found to be unreasonable under the Indiana Constitution [reversed]

Search of a pill bottle incident to an arrest for driving without a license is found to be unreasonable under the Indiana Constitution. Garcia v. State, 2015 Ind. App. LEXIS 50 (February 3, 2015), but reversed: Garcia v. State, 2016 … Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search, State constitution | Comments Off on IN: Search of a pill bottle incident to an arrest for driving without a DL is found to be unreasonable under the Indiana Constitution [reversed]

MA: Egregious police conduct can confer target standing, but this case just doesn’t measure up

Egregious police conduct can confer target standing, but this case just doesn’t measure up. Commonwealth v. Santiago, 470 Mass. 574, 24 N.E.3d 560 (2015): We reaffirm the view stated in Scardamaglia, 410 Mass. at 380, that in a case where … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing, State constitution | Comments Off on MA: Egregious police conduct can confer target standing, but this case just doesn’t measure up

E.D.Cal.: Non-residents can’t complain of a dog sniff in the yard of a grow operation at a house

Codefendants who did not live at the premises had no standing to contest the presence of a drug dog in the front yard to sniff. Codefendants’ brief presence at a grow operation, with other things, was still probable cause for … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Dog sniff, Standing, State constitution | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Non-residents can’t complain of a dog sniff in the yard of a grow operation at a house

OR: Officer pulled into gas station behind defendant and made him talk, thereby making it a stop

Defendant pulled into a gas station, gassed up, and bought a drink. When he came out, a police car was parked behind him, and the officer required him to talk about the reason for the “stop.” This became a stop … Continue reading →

Posted in Seizure, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: Officer pulled into gas station behind defendant and made him talk, thereby making it a stop

PA decision that CI’s recording inside a house required a warrant affirmed by equally divided court

In 2013, Pennsylvania Superior Court held that the state constitution prohibits warrantless taping inside a suspect’s home with a video camera planted on an informant. Commonwealth v. Dunnavant, 2013 PA Super 38, 63 A.3d 1252 (2013) (posted here). That decision … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, State constitution | Comments Off on PA decision that CI’s recording inside a house required a warrant affirmed by equally divided court

Bloomberg: In Rare State Move, Wyoming May Add Individual Right to Privacy to Constitution

Bloomberg: In Rare State Move, Wyoming May Add Individual Right to Privacy to Constitution by Tripp Baltz: Dec. 18 — Other states may want to follow Wyoming lawmakers, who in early 2015 will consider a proposed constitutional amendment (15LSO-0066) that … Continue reading →

Posted in State constitution | Comments Off on Bloomberg: In Rare State Move, Wyoming May Add Individual Right to Privacy to Constitution

MA: Arrest on recalled warrant suppressed under state const. where officers violated policy and didn’t recheck

Product of an arrest on a recently recalled warrant suppressed under the state constitution. The police had plenty of time to check the status of the warrant during the hours of surveillance looking for defendant and waiting for him to … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Exclusionary rule, State constitution | Comments Off on MA: Arrest on recalled warrant suppressed under state const. where officers violated policy and didn’t recheck

Cal.1: Taking DNA from an arrestee violates the California Constitution; Maryland v. King distinguished

California’s Constitution and DNA statute is different than Maryland’s in Maryland v. King so taking DNA from an arrestee is unconstitutional. People v. Buza, 2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 1100 (1st Dist. December 3, 2014):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, DNA, Informational privacy, State constitution | Comments Off on Cal.1: Taking DNA from an arrestee violates the California Constitution; Maryland v. King distinguished

IN: “No Trespassing” sign and cable across driveway defined curtilage under state constitution; entry required warrant

“No Trespassing” signs used to be not determinative of curtilage. It’s apparent they are becoming so. Here, the defendant had a cable across the driveway, a “No Trespassing” sign, and a surveillance camera. The police were not in hot pursuit … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, State constitution | Comments Off on IN: “No Trespassing” sign and cable across driveway defined curtilage under state constitution; entry required warrant

IA: Iowa requires a search warrant for a probation search

Iowa requires a search warrant for a probation search. State v. Sacco, 2014 Iowa App. LEXIS 945 (October 1, 2014): The State asserts the legality of the search at issue here is “controlled by Griffin.” In regard only to Sacco’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, State constitution | Comments Off on IA: Iowa requires a search warrant for a probation search

IN still doesn’t recognize the attenuation doctrine

The attenuation doctrine does not apply to violations of the Indiana Constitution. Admittedly, the search of defendant’s vehicle was unlawful, and a receipt found was followed back to video of the transaction. Indiana hasn’t yet adopted inevitable discovery under the … Continue reading →

Posted in Independent source, State constitution | Comments Off on IN still doesn’t recognize the attenuation doctrine

TN: Arrival of a police squad with arrest warrants was a “seizure” despite defendant’s flight

Several police cars from Knoxville PD pulled up at a house with arrest warrants for people known to hang out there. Defendant saw them and fled and was pursued. The arrival of that many police was a “seizure” under the … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, State constitution | Comments Off on TN: Arrival of a police squad with arrest warrants was a “seizure” despite defendant’s flight

IN: Refuses to find any reasonable expectation of privacy in telephone records under state constitution

Defendant didn’t pursue an interlocutory appeal of his suppression motion on telephone records being seized in violation of the state constitution. Therefore, he waived it by objecting at trial. Nevertheless, the court finds that he would lose on the state … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, State constitution, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IN: Refuses to find any reasonable expectation of privacy in telephone records under state constitution

IA rejects SCOTUS probation and parole search exception on state constitution

On state constitutional grounds, Iowa refuses to follow SCOTUS on probation and parole searches. A search warrant is required without consent. “For the above reasons, we think Cullison remains good law. We decline to overrule it. The United States Supreme … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, State constitution | Comments Off on IA rejects SCOTUS probation and parole search exception on state constitution

VT: Pre-conviction DNA testing of arrestees after arraignment violates the search provision of state constitution

In a comprehensive opinion, the Vermont Supreme Court held Friday that pre-conviction DNA testing of arrestees after arraignment violates the search provision of the Vermont Constitution. It failed every point of analysis. State v. Medina, 2014 VT 69, 2014 Vt. … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, State constitution | Comments Off on VT: Pre-conviction DNA testing of arrestees after arraignment violates the search provision of state constitution

OR: Ordering defendant out of his house for an FST was a “stop” and detention as a show of authority

Ordering defendant out of his house for a FST was a “stop” and detention under the state constitution because it was a show of authority. State v. Charles, 263 Or. App. ___, 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 804 (June 18, 2014). … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Motion to suppress, Particularity, State constitution, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OR: Ordering defendant out of his house for an FST was a “stop” and detention as a show of authority

Cal.2d: State pharmacy controlled substance database doesn’t violate patients’ privacy rights

A patient does not have a substantial enough state constitutional privacy right to overcome the public interest in making prescription controlled substances records inspections at pharmacies. Pharmacies are highly regulated, and there are sufficient other general protections of patient information. … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on Cal.2d: State pharmacy controlled substance database doesn’t violate patients’ privacy rights