Category Archives: Qualified immunity

CA10: QI isn’t determined by violation of state law; has to be violation of federal law

In a fractured panel decision, the Tenth Circuit holds that federal law governs qualified immunity, not state law. Here, defendant violated clearly established state law, but the district court didn’t decide whether it violated clearly established federal law. Remanded. Stanley … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: QI isn’t determined by violation of state law; has to be violation of federal law

C.D.Cal.: That building inspector’s entry was governed by 4A is clearly established

A municipal building inspector’s entry into plaintiff’s building is governed by the Fourth Amendment and the law is well established. “Red-Tagging” the property for defects facially states a claim for relief and the motion to dismiss is denied. VNT Prop. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: That building inspector’s entry was governed by 4A is clearly established

OR: Telling def to let out dogs so police could search his house was not his consent

The officers showed up to search defendant’s house and told him that he could let his dogs out or they would do it before the search. His letting the dogs out wasn’t consent to the search. “Moreover, under the totality … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on OR: Telling def to let out dogs so police could search his house was not his consent

E.D.Ark.: There is no such thing as a negligent search and seizure claim

There is no such thing as a negligent search and seizure claim. Rudd v. City of Jonesboro, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28682 (E.D.Ark. March 1, 2017). The search of plaintiff’s truck in a garage was reasonable and officers get qualified … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: There is no such thing as a negligent search and seizure claim

WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: 11th Circuit: Cops weren’t given enough notice that police tactics used for decades are unconstitutional

WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: 11th Circuit: Cops weren’t given enough notice that police tactics used for decades are unconstitutional by Radley Balko:

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: 11th Circuit: Cops weren’t given enough notice that police tactics used for decades are unconstitutional

CA10: QI applies to suit by driver and his child in car over police shooting driver

Several officers attempted to stop plaintiff at 3:50 am, and he finally stopped. One officer got in front of the car with a shotgun, and the car moved forward. That officer fired two shots from a shotgun at the driver, … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: QI applies to suit by driver and his child in car over police shooting driver

CA1: No curtilage in def’s apt building yard

Defendant’s curtilage to an apartment building wasn’t violated by police entry through an unlocked back gate to get to the front door. (That apparently was a common way in.) Defendant came to the door and let them in, and then … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA1: No curtilage in def’s apt building yard

CA10: Handcuffing and jailing an inebriated man as “incapacitated” violated the 4A and no QI

Plaintiff showed up at a concert at the Xfinity Center in Boston inebriated, but not so drunk he didn’t know what he was doing. Security separated him from the incoming line into the hands of the defendant, an off-duty officer … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Handcuffing and jailing an inebriated man as “incapacitated” violated the 4A and no QI

CA4: No QI for arrest w/o PC and pft held for 80 days; lack of PC was obvious

Plaintiff was held for 80 days on an arrest utterly without probable cause, and the officer has no qualified immunity. Smith v. Munday, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 1975 (4th Cir. Feb. 3, 2017):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA4: No QI for arrest w/o PC and pft held for 80 days; lack of PC was obvious

CA5: Ptf loses on his civil Franks claim because of a lack of materiality to PC

The affidavit for arrest warrant failed to include information that would undermine the credibility of the police informant, but the court finds that the omission was not material and there was other information that supported probable cause. Therefore, the officer … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Ptf loses on his civil Franks claim because of a lack of materiality to PC

Cert.granted: District of Columbia v. Wesby on qualified immunity

Cert.granted: District of Columbia v. Wesby, 15-1485 (Jan. 19, 2017). Issues: (1) Whether police officers who found late-night partiers inside a vacant home belonging to someone else had probable cause to arrest the partiers for trespassing under the Fourth Amendment, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Cert.granted: District of Columbia v. Wesby on qualified immunity

CA11: Arguable probable cause entitles the officer to qualified immunity, here for a mental health seizure

Arguable probable cause entitles the officer to qualified immunity, here for a mental health seizure. May v. City of Nahunta, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 20501 (11th Cir. Nov. 15, 2016), same result on rehearing, May v. City of Nahunta, 2017 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Arguable probable cause entitles the officer to qualified immunity, here for a mental health seizure

New law review article: Is Qualified Immunity Unlawful?

William Baude, Is Qualified Immunity Unlawful?. Abstract:

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on New law review article: Is Qualified Immunity Unlawful?

CA6: Factual disputes deny appellate jurisdiction for excessive force qualified immunity appeal

There were disputes of fact on plaintiff’s excessive force claim that deprived this court of appellate jurisdiction over it. Harmon v. Hamilton County, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 497 (6th Cir. Jan. 9, 2017)*:

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Factual disputes deny appellate jurisdiction for excessive force qualified immunity appeal

D.Md.: Extended border search from customs at JFK to locked warehouse in Maryland

The extended border search doctrine applied to a package shipped from China through customs at JFK and then to a warehouse in Bowie, Maryland. It was under lock and key, even on the truck, from customs to the warehouse where … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Md.: Extended border search from customs at JFK to locked warehouse in Maryland

CA8: Visitor at apt complex can’t claim standing in parking lot as alleged curtilage

Defendant didn’t have standing to claim that police entry into an apartment building’s parking lot was entry onto the curtilage because he didn’t live there. [It’s not curtilage anyway.] A cousin did, and he was an occasional visitor. Officers shining … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: Visitor at apt complex can’t claim standing in parking lot as alleged curtilage

AK: Reconsideration of finding of no PC granted; def never really put lack of PC in issue

At issue was a seizure and then warranted search of defendant’s cell phone looking for an incriminating text message that was already seen by the police on the recipient’s cell phone. At the hearing, the Superior Court granted a motion … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Cell phones, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on AK: Reconsideration of finding of no PC granted; def never really put lack of PC in issue

CA6: Shooting dogs during drug raid was a seizure, but here it was reasonable

Officers executing a high risk warrant on plaintiff’s house shot and killed two pit bulls, one of which was standing in a corner of the basement not yet attacking. The warrant was considered high risk because the target of the … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: Shooting dogs during drug raid was a seizure, but here it was reasonable

CA7: Arrest for disorderly conduct was clearly without PC, so officers get no qualified immunity

Officers have no qualified immunity for an arrest for disorderly conduct that was obviously without probable cause, and no reasonable officer could have concluded otherwise. Catledge v. City of Chicago, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 22118 (7th Cir. Dec. 13, 2016):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Arrest for disorderly conduct was clearly without PC, so officers get no qualified immunity

CA9 (en banc): Where exigency for CPS worker to take child wasn’t really clear at time, she gets qualified immunity

At the time of this seizure of an infant from the parents in 2008, it was clearly established that child protection workers could not remove children from the parents without a warrant or exigency, but not something like these facts … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9 (en banc): Where exigency for CPS worker to take child wasn’t really clear at time, she gets qualified immunity